Institutional feedback and support for the welfare state: The case of national health care

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 862-885

  Jordan, Jason ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health care; Institutional feedback; Public opinion; Welfare

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953162953     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414010361342     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Altenstetter, C. (1999). From solidarity to market competition? Values, structure, and strategy in German health policy, 1883-1997. In F. D. Powell & A. F. Wessen (Eds.), Health care systems in transition: An international perspective (pp. 47-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Andreβ, H.-J., & Heien, T. (2001). Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17, 337-356.
3. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44, 283-299.
4. Bambra, C. (2005). Cash versus services: Worlds of welfare and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services. Journal of Social Policy, 34(2), 195-213.
5. Bean, C., & Papadakis, E. (1998). A comparison of mass attitudes towards the welfare state in different institutional regimes, 1985-1990. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(3), 211-236.
6. Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19, 415-427.
7. Brambor, T., Clark, W.R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63-82.
8. Daykin, A.R., & Moffatt, P.G. (2002). Analyzing ordered responses: A review of the ordered probit model. Understanding Statistics, 1(3), 157-166.
9. Edlund, J. (1999). Trust in government and welfare regimes: Attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway. European Journal of Political Research, 35, 341-370.
10. Edlund, J. (2007). Class conflicts and institutional feedback effects in liberal and social democratic welfare regimes: Attitudes toward state redistribution and welfare policy in six western countries. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), The political sociology of the welfare state: Institutions, social cleavages, and orientations (pp. 30-79). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J.H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Franzese, R.J.J. (2005). Empirical strategies for various manifestations of multilevel data. Political Analysis, 13, 430-446.
14. Freeman, R. (1999). Institutions, states, and cultures, health policy and politics in Europe. In J. Clasen (Ed.), Comparative social policy: Concepts, theories, and methods (pp. 80-94). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15. Hacker, J.S. (2004). Dismantling the health care state? Political institutions, public policies and the comparative politics of health reform. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 693-724.
16. Jæger, M.M. (2006). Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review, 22, 157-170.
17. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 341-355.
18. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in western countries. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661-687.
19. Larsen, C.A. (2008). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies, 41(2), 145-168.
20. McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Norton, E.C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. STATA Journal, 4(2), 154-167.
22. Oorschot, W.V. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Politics & Policy, 28, 33-48.
23. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143-179.
25. Rose, D., & Harrison, E. (2007). The European socio-economic classification: A new social class schema for comparative European research. European Societies, 9(3), 459-490.
26. Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rothstein, B. (2002). The universal welfare state as social dilemma. In B. Rothstein & S. Steinmo (Eds.), Restructuring the welfare state: Political institutions and policy change (pp. 206-222). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Steenbergen, M.R., & Jones, B.S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218-237.
29. Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review, 13, 283-304.
30. Svallfors, S. (2004). Class, attitudes and the welfare state: Sweden in comparative perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2), 119-138.
31. Svallfors, S. (2007). The political sociology of the welfare state: Institutions, social cleavages, and orientations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32. Wessen, A.F. (1999). The comparative study of health care reform. In F. D. Powell & A. F. Wessen (Eds.), Health care systems in transition: An international perspective (pp. 3-24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.