Dental education as a social science: Some implications for research

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 65-68

  Bullock, Alison ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH;

EDUCATION, DENTAL; HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH;

EID: 77953161085     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00626.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (25)

1. Bligh J, Brice J. What is the value of good medical education research? Med Educ 2008, 42:652-653.
2. Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ 2009, 43:196-198.
3. Gill D, Griffin AE. Reframing medical education research: let's make the publishable meaningful and the meaningful publishable. Med Educ 2009, 43:933-935.
4. Tan TPY, Stokes T, Shaw EJ. Use of qualitative research as evidence in the clinical guideline program of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2009, 7:169-172.
5. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education 2000, London, RoutledgeFalmer
6. Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol 1992, 83:97-111.
7. Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge 1999, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
8. Shifferdecker KE, Reed VA. Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 2009, 43:637-644.
9. Albert M. Understanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological perspective. Acad Med 2004, 79:948-953. 10
10. Hammersley M. Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. Evidence-based practice in education 2004, 133-149. Thomas GPring R. In, eds, Maidenhead, Open University Press
11. Hutchinson L. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ 1999, 318:1267-1269.
12. ten Cate O. Why the ethics of medical education research differs from that of medical research. Med Educ 2009, 43:608-610.
13. Shea JA, Arnold L, Mann KV. A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Acad Med 2004, 79:931-938.
14. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research 1967, New York, Aldine
15. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000, 320:114-116.
16. McMillan W. Finding a method to analyze qualitative data: using a study of conceptual learning. J Dent Educ 2009, 73:53-64.
17. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995, 311:109-112.
18. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research 1994, 105-117. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. In, eds, London, Sage
19. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry 1985, Beverly Hills, Sage
20. Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000, 320:50-52.
21. Ambert AM, Adler PA, Adler P, Detzner DF. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. J Marriage Fam 1995, 57:879-893.
22. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BJ. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med 2008, 6:331-339.
23. Stige B, Malterud K, Midtgarden T. Towards an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2009, 19:1504-1516.
24. Cassell C, Buehring A, Symon G, Johnson P, Bishop V. Qualitative management research: a thematic analysis of interviews with stakeholders in the field. 2005, http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/e-space/handle/2173/5015, Final Research Report, (accessed 2 February 2010)
25. Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66:2520-2531.