Population structure of Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the United States

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1037-1042

  Medina, R F ^a   Rondon, S I ^b   Reyna, S M ^a   Dickey, A M ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms; Phylogeography; Potato; Potato tubermoth

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEM; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CROP PEST; MOTH; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION STRUCTURE; POTATO;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MOTH; PARASITOLOGY; POTATO; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MOTHS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

GELECHIIDAE; LEPIDOPTERA; PHTHORIMAEA OPERCULELLA; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 77953152700     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/EN09286     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Althoff, D. M., and O. Pellmyr. 2002. Examining genetic structure in a bogus yucca moth: a sequential approach to phylogeography. Evolution 56: 1632-1643.
2. Anonymous. 2006. Integrated pest management for potatoes in the western United States. University of California, Davis, CA.
3. Briese, D. T. 1986. Geographic variability in demographic performance of the potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella Zeller in Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 76: 719-726.
4. Chittenden, F. H. 1913. The potato tubermoth. U.S. Dept. Agric. FarmerÕs Bull. 557: 1-7.
5. Dogramaci, M., S. I. Rondon, and G. H. DeBano. 2008. The effect of soil depth and exposure to winter conditions on survival of the potato tuberworm Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera:Gelechiidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 129: 332-339.
6. Evanno, G., S. Regnaut, and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molec. Ecol. 14: 2611-2620.
7. Falush, D., M. Stephens, and J. K. Pritchard. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Molec. Ecol. Notes 7: 574-578.
8. Fuentes-Contreras, E., J. L. Espinoza, B. Lavandero, and C. C. Ramirez. 2008. Population genetic structure of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from apple orchards in central Chile. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 190-198.
9. Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
10. Jensen, A., P. Hamm, A. Schreiber, and S. DeBano. 2005. Prepare for tuber moth in 2005. Potato Progress. 5: 1-4.
11. Landolt, P. J., and A. Jensen. 2006. Potato tuberworm pheromone trapping. Potato Progres. 6: 1-2.
12. Medina, R. F., P. Barbosa, M. Christman, and A. Battisti. 2006. Number of individuals and molecular markers to use in genetic differentiation studies. Molec. Ecol. Notes 6: 1010-1013.
13. Mynhardt, G., M. K. Harris, and A. I. Cognato. 2007. Population genetics of the pecan weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) inferred from mitochondrial nucleotide data. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 100: 582-590.
14. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
15. Pritchard, J. K., X. Wen, and D. Falush. 2007. Documentation for STRUCTURE software: version 2.2. (http:// pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu).
16. Qiagen. 2002. Dneasy tissue handbook. Qiagen, Valencia, CA.
17. Radcliffe, E. B. 1982. Insect pest of potato. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27: 173-204.
18. Roderick, G. K. 1996. Geographic structure insect populations: gene ßow, phylogeography, and their uses. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 325-352.
19. Rondon, S. I. 2010. The potato tuberworm: a literature review of its biology, ecology, and control. Am. J. Potato Res. 87: 149-166.
20. Rondon, S. I., G. H. DeBano, P. B. Clough, A. Hamm, A. Jensen, J. M. Schreiber, M. Alvarez, J. Thornton, J. D. Barbour, and M. Dogramaci. 2007. Biology and management of the potato tuberworm in the Pacific Northwest. PNW 594: 1-8.
21. Vekemans, X., T. Beauwens, M. Lemaire, and I. Roldan-Ruiz. 2002. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Molec. Ecol. 11: 139-151.
22. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Vandelee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA-fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
23. Wright, S. E. 1921. Systems of mating. II. The effects of inbreeding on the genetic composition of a population. Genetics 6: 144-161.
24. Zhivotovsky, L. A. 1999. Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Molec. Ecol. 8: 907-913.