Study-specific EPI template improves group analysis in functional MRI of young and older adults

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 257-266

  Huang, Chih Mao ^a,b,d   Lee, Shwu Hua ^b,f   Hsiao, Ing Tsung ^a   Kuan, Wan Chun ^c   Wai, Yau Yau ^a,b   Ko, Han Jung ^b   Wan, Yung Liang ^a,b   Hsu, Yuan Yu ^d,e   Liu, Ho Ling ^a,b  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d BUDDHIST TZU CHI GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e TZU CHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^f CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

FMRI; Group analysis; Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template; Spatial normalization; Study specific template (SST)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MONTREAL NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE TEMPLATE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STUDY SPECIFIC TEMPLATE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; AGING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; EVALUATION STUDY; HAND; LANGUAGE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DATABASES AS TOPIC; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953134473     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Argall B.D., Saad Z.S., Beauchamp M.S. Simplified intersubject averaging on the cortical surface using SUMA. Hum Brain Mapp 2006, 27:14-27.
2. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp 1999, 7:254-266.
3. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. NeuroImage 2000, 11:805-821.
4. Bennett C.M., Baird A.A. Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: a voxel-based morphometry study. Hum Brain Mapp 2006, 27:766-777.
5. Brett M., Johnsrude I.S., Owen A.M. The problem of functional localization in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:243-249.
6. Colebatch J.G., Deiber M.P., Passingham R.E., Friston K.J., Frackowiak R.S. Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. J Neurophysiol 1991, 65:1392-1401.
7. Collins D.L., Neelin P., Peters T.M., Evans A.C. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994, 18:192-205.
8. Constable R.T. Functional MR imaging using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging in the presence of large static field inhomogeneities. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995, 5:746-752.
9. Crivello F., Schormann T., Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Roland P.E., Zilles K., Mazoyer B.M. Comparison of spatial normalization procedures and their impact on functional maps. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 16:228-250.
10. Deichmann R., Gottfried J.A., Hutton C., Turner R. Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex. NeuroImage 2003, 19:430-441.
11. Dennis N., Cabeza R.C. Neuroimaging of healthy cognitive aging. The handbook of aging and cognition 2008, 1-54. Psychology Press, New York. F.I. Craik, T.A. Salthouse (Eds.).
12. Dubb A., Gur R., Avants B., Gee J. Characterization of sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. NeuroImage 2003, 20:512-519.
13. Fox P.T. Spatial normalization origins: objectives, applications, and alternatives. Hum Brain Mapp 1995, 3:161-164.
14. Fox P.T., Laird A.R., Lancaster J.L. Coordinate-based voxel-wise meta-analysis: dividends of spatial normalization. Report of a virtual workshop. Hum Brain Mapp 2005, 25:1-5.
15. Fox P.T., Perlmutter J.S., Raichle M.E. A stereotactic method of anatomical localization for positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985, 9:141-153.
16. Frahm J., Merboldt K.D., Hanicke W. Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation. Magn Reson Med 1988, 6:474-480.
17. Friston K.J., Ashburner J., Frith C.D., Poline J.B., Heather J.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 1995, 3:165-189.
18. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Price C.J., Buchel C., Worsley K.J. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. NeuroImage 1999, 10:385-396.
19. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J., Poline J.P., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1994, 2:189-210.
20. Glover G.H. 3D z-shim method for reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI. Magn Reson Med 1999, 42:290-299.
21. Good C.D., Johnsrude I., Ashburner J., Henson R.N., Friston K.J., Frackowiak R.S. Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. NeuroImage 2001, 14:685-700.
22. Good C.D., Johnsrude I.S., Ashburner J., Henson R.N., Friston K.J., Frackowiak R.S. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. NeuroImage 2001, 14:21-36.
23. Grachev I.D., Berdichevsky D., Rauch S.L., Heckers S., Kennedy D.N., Caviness V.S., et al. A method for assessing the accuracy of intersubject registration of the human brain using anatomic landmarks. NeuroImage 1999, 9:250-268.
24. Hammers A., Allom R., Koepp M.J., Free S.L., Myers R., Lemieux L., et al. Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Hum Brain Mapp 2003, 19:224-247.
25. Hammers A., Koepp M.J., Free S.L., Brett M., Richardson M.P., Labbe C., et al. Implementation and application of a brain template for multiple volumes of interest. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 15:165-174.
26. Hoeksma M.R., Kenemans J.L., Kemner C., van Engeland H. Variability in spatial normalization of pediatric and adult brain images. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:1188-1194.
27. Hsu Y.Y., Huang C.M., Kuan W.C., Chen H.M., Wai Y.Y., Wan Y.L., et al. Spatial normalization of fMRI results using study-based EPI and T1-weighted brain templates. Proceedings of the ISMRM 15th annual meeting 2007, 1860.
28. Hulshoff Pol H.E., Schnack H.G., Mandl R.C., Brans R.G., van Haren N.E., Baare W.F., et al. Gray and white matter density changes in monozygotic and same-sex dizygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia using voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage 2006, 31:482-488.
29. Hutton C., Bork A., Josephs O., Deichmann R., Ashburner J., Turner R. Image distortion correction in fMRI: a quantitative evaluation. NeuroImage 2002, 16:217-240.
30. Jang S.H., Ahn S.H., Yang D.S., Lee D.K., Kim D.K., Son S.M. Cortical reorganization of hand motor function to primary sensory cortex in hemiparetic patients with a primary motor cortex infarct. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:1706-1708.
31. Job D.E., Whalley H.C., Johnstone E.C., Lawrie S.M. Grey matter changes over time in high risk subjects developing schizophrenia. NeuroImage 2005, 25:1023-1030.
32. Job D.E., Whalley H.C., McConnell S., Glabus M., Johnstone E.C., Lawrie S.M. Structural gray matter differences between first-episode schizophrenics and normal controls using voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage 2002, 17:880-889.
33. Karas G.B., Burton E.J., Rombouts S.A., van Schijndel R.A., O'Brien J.T., Scheltens P., et al. A comprehensive study of gray matter loss in patients with Alzheimer's disease using optimized voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage 2003, 18:895-907.
34. Kochunov P., Hasnain M., Lancaster J., Grabowski T., Fox P. Improvement in variability of the horizontal meridian of the primary visual area following high-resolution spatial normalization. Hum Brain Mapp 2003, 18:123-134.
35. Kubota T., Ushijima Y., Okuyama C., Nishimura T. A region-of-interest template for three-dimensional stereotactic surface projection images: initial application to the analysis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Nucl Med Commun 2006, 27:37-44.
36. Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Chesler D.A., Goldberg I.E., Weisskoff R.M., Poncelet B.P., et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:5675-5679.
37. Lancaster J.L., Fox P.T., Downs H., Nickerson D.S., Hander T.A., El Mallah M., et al. Global spatial normalization of human brain using convex hulls. J Nucl Med 1999, 40:942-955.
38. Lancaster J.L., Glass T.G., Lankipalli B.R., Downs H., Mayberg H., Fox P.T. A modality-independent approach to spatial normalization of tomographic images of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 1995, 3:209-223.
39. Lee J.S., Ahn S.H., Lee D.S., Oh S.H., Kim C.S., Jeong J.M., et al. Voxel-based statistical analysis of cerebral glucose metabolism in the rat cortical deafness model by 3D reconstruction of brain from autoradiographic images. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005, 32:696-701.
40. Lee J.S., Lee D.S., Kim J., Kim Y.K., Kang E., Kang H., et al. Development of Korean standard brain templates. J Korean Med Sci 2005, 20:483-488.
41. Liu G., Ogawa S. EPI image reconstruction with correction of distortion and signal losses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24:683-689.
42. Naidich T.P., Blum J.T., Firestone M.I. The parasagittal line: an anatomic landmark for axial imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22:885-895.
43. Nair D.G., Fuchs A., Burkart S., Steinberg F.L., Kelso J.A. Assessing recovery in middle cerebral artery stroke using functional MRI. Brain Inj 2005, 19:1165-1176.
44. Ogawa S., Tank D.W., Menon R., Ellermann J.M., Kim S.G., Merkle H., et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:5951-5955.
45. Owen A.M., McMillan K.M., Laird A.R., Bullmore E. N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 2005, 25:46-59.
46. Park D.C., Reuter-Lorenz P. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol 2009, 60:173-196.
47. Park H.J., Levitt J., Shenton M.E., Salisbury D.F., Kubicki M., Kikinis R., et al. An MRI study of spatial probability brain map differences between first-episode schizophrenia and normal controls. NeuroImage 2004, 22:1231-1246.
48. Peterson E., Schmidt G.L., Tregellas J.R., Winterrowd E., Kopelioff L., Hepburn S., et al. A voxel-based morphometry study of gray matter in parents of children with autism. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1289-1292.
49. Rademacher J., Caviness V.S., Steinmetz H., Galaburda A.M. Topographical variation of the human primary cortices: implications for neuroimaging, brain mapping, and neurobiology. Cereb Cortex 1993, 3:313-329.
50. Raz N. The aging brain observed in vivo: differential changes and their modifiers. Cognitive neuroscience of aging 2005, 19-57. Oxford University Press, New York. R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, D. Park (Eds.).
51. Remy F., Frankenstein U.N., Mincic A., Tomanek B., Stroman P.W. Pain modulates cerebral activity during cognitive performance. NeuroImage 2003, 19:655-664.
52. Roland P.E., Graufelds C.J., Wahlin J., Ingelman L., Andersson M., Ledberg A., et al. Human brain atlas: for high-resolution functional and anatomical mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 1993, 1:173-184.
53. Schmahmann J.D., Doyon J., McDonald D., Holmes C., Lavoie K., Hurwitz A.S., et al. Three-dimensional MRI atlas of the human cerebellum in proportional stereotaxic space. NeuroImage 1999, 10:233-260.
54. Senjem M.L., Gunter J.L., Shiung M.M., Petersen R.C., Jack C.R. Comparison of different methodological implementations of voxel-based morphometry in neurodegenerative disease. NeuroImage 2005, 26:600-608.
55. Tan L.H., Spinks J.A., Gao J.H., Liu H.L., Perfetti C.A., Xiong J., et al. Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2000, 10:16-27.
56. Thompson P.M., MacDonald D., Mega M.S., Holmes C.J., Evans A.C., Toga A.W. Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997, 21:567-581.
57. Thompson P.M., Mega M.S., Woods R.P., Zoumalan C.I., Lindshield C.J., Blanton R.E., et al. Cortical change in Alzheimer's disease detected with a disease-specific population-based brain atlas. Cereb Cortex 2001, 11:1-16.
58. Toga A.W., Thompson P.M. Maps of the brain. Anat Rec 2001, 265:37-53.
59. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N., et al. Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain. NeuroImage 2002, 15:273-289.
60. Waiter G.D., Williams J.H., Murray A.D., Gilchrist A., Perrett D.I., Whiten A. A voxel-based investigation of brain structure in male adolescents with autistic spectrum disorder. NeuroImage 2004, 22:619-625.
61. Weiskopf N., Hutton C., Josephs O., Deichmann R. Optimal EPI parameters for reduction of susceptibility-induced BOLD sensitivity losses: a whole-brain analysis at 3T and 1.5T. NeuroImage 2006, 33:493-504.
62. Wilke M., Schmithorst V.J., Holland S.K. Assessment of spatial normalization of whole-brain magnetic resonance images in children. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 17:48-60.
63. Zilles K., Kawashima R., Dabringhaus A., Fukuda H., Schormann T. Hemispheric shape of European and Japanese brains: 3-D MRI analysis of intersubject variability, ethnical, and gender differences. NeuroImage 2001, 13:262-271.
64. Zilles K., Schleicher A., Langemann C., Amunts K., Morosan P., Palomero-Gallagher N., et al. Quantitative analysis of sulci in the human cerebral cortex: development, regional heterogeneity, gender difference, asymmetry, intersubject variability and cortical architecture. Hum Brain Mapp 1997, 5:218-221.