Extrinsic factors in the perception of bistable motion stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 1257-1265

  Baker, Daniel H ^a   Graf, Erich W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bistable motion; Contextual modulation; Motion integration; Saccades

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYELID REFLEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLINKING; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES;

EID: 77953131179     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adelson E.H. Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness. Science 1993, 262:2042-2044.
2. Alais D., Blake R. Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Research 1998, 38:637-644.
3. Amano K., Edwards M., Badcock D.R., Nishida S. Adaptive pooling of visual motion signals by the human visual system revealed with a novel multi-element stimulus. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(3):4.
4. Anderson B.L., Winawer J. Image segmentation and lightness perception. Nature 2005, 434:79-83.
5. Baker D.H., Graf E.W. Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(4):26.
6. Baker D.H., Graf E.W. Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:5436-5441.
7. Baker D.H., Graf E.W. Contextual effects in speed perception may occur at an early stage of processing. Vision Research 2010, 50:193-201.
8. Blakemore C., Tobin E.A. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1972, 15:439-440.
9. Born R.T., Tootell R.B. Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature 1992, 357:497-499.
10. Braddick O. Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing. Trends in Neurosciences 1993, 16:263-268.
11. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
12. Cannon M.W., Fullenkamp S.C. Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Research 1991, 31:1985-1998.
13. Carter O.L., Campbell T.G., Liu G.B., Wallis G. Contradictory influence of context on predominance during binocular rivalry. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 2004, 87:153-162.
14. Cornelissen F.W., Peters E.M., Palmer J. The EyeLink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 2002, 34:613-617.
15. Einhäuser W., Stout J., Koch C., Carter O. Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:1704-1709.
16. Georgeson M.A. Spatial frequency selectivity of a visual tilt illusion. Nature 1973, 245:43-45.
17. Graf E.W., Adams W.J. Surface organization influences bistable vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:502-508.
18. Huang X., Albright T.D., Stoner G.R. Adaptive surround modulation in cortical area MT. Neuron 2007, 53:761-770.
19. Hupé J.M., Rubin N. The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: A fresh look at plaids. Vision Research 2003, 43:531-548.
20. Hupé J.M., Rubin N. The oblique plaid effect. Vision Research 2004, 44:489-500.
21. Ichihara S., Goryo K. The effects of relative orientation of surrounding gratings on binocular rivalry and apparent brightness of central gratings. Japanese Psychological Research 1978, 20:159-166.
22. Kozák L.R., Castelo-Branco M. Peripheral influences on motion integration in foveal vision are modulated by central local ambiguity and center-surround congruence. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2009, 50:980-988.
23. Laubrock J., Engbert R., Kliegl R. Fixational eye movements predict the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(14):13.
24. Levelt W.J.M. The alternation process in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology 1966, 57:225-238.
25. Loomis J.M., Nakayama K. A velocity analogue of brightness contrast. Perception 1973, 2:425-427.
26. Meese T.S., Challinor K.L., Summers R.J., Baker D.H. Suppression pathways saturate with contrast for parallel surrounds but not superimposed cross-oriented masks. Vision Research 2009, 49:2927-2935.
27. Norman H.P., Norman J.F., Todd J.T., Lindsey D.T. Spatial interactions in perceived speed. Perception 1996, 25:815-830.
28. Ooi T.L., He Z.J. Binocular rivalry and surface-boundary processing. Perception 2006, 35:581-603.
29. Paffen C.L.E., Tadin D., te Pas S.F., Blake R., Verstraten F.A.J. Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 2006, 46:599-604.
30. Paffen C.L.E., te Pas S.F., Kanai R., van der Smagt M.J., Verstraten F.A.J. Center-surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 2004, 44:1635-1639.
31. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
32. Petrov Y., Carandini M., McKee S.P. Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:8704-8707.
33. Polat U., Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research 1993, 33:993-999.
34. Tadin D., Lappin J.S., Gilroy L.A., Blake R. Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature 2003, 424:312-315.
35. Tynan P., Sekuler R. Simultaneous motion contrast: Velocity, sensitivity and depth response. Vision Research 1975, 15:1231-1238.
36. van Dam L.C.J., van Ee R. The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vision Research 2005, 45:2417-2435.
37. van Dam L.C.J., van Ee R. The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 2006, 46:787-799.
38. von Grunau M., Dube S. Ambiguous plaids: Switching between coherence and transparency. Spatial Vision 1993, 7:199-211.
39. Webb B.S., Dhruv N.T., Solomon S.G., Tailby C., Lennie P. Early and late mechanisms of surround suppression in striate cortex of macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:11666-11675.
40. Webb B.S., Ledgeway T., McGraw P.V. Cortical pooling algorithms for judging global motion direction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:3532-3537.
41. Wertheim A.H., Paffen C.L.E. Centre-surround relative motion and the freezing rotation illusion. Perception 2009, 38:1610-1620.