Contradictory influence of context on predominance during Binocular rivalry

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 153-162

  Carter, Olivia L ^a   Campbell, Thomas G ^a   Liu, Guang B ^a   Wallis, Guy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Context; Dominance; Suppression

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

DOMINANCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 3843064653     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb03168.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Walker P. Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Percept Psychophys 1975;18:467-473.
2. Wheatstone C. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 1838;128:371-394.
3. Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry. Nature 1996;380:621-624.
4. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 1998;280:1930-1934.
5. Pettigrew JD. Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations. Brain and Mind 2001;2:85-118.
6. Tong F. Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. Brain and Mind 2001;2:55-83.
7. Diaz-Caneja E. Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Ann D'Oculistique 1928, 1928: 721-723.
8. Lee SH, Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res 1999;39:1447-1454.
9. Ngo TT, Miller SM, Liu GB, Pettigrew JD. Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence. Curr Biol 2000; 10: R134-136.
10. Spillmann L. Colour in a larger perspective: the rebirth of Gestalt psychology. Perception 1997;26:1341-1352.
11. Treisman A. The binding problem. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1996;6:171-178.
12. Alais D, Blake R. Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Res 1998;38:637-644.
13. Sobel KV, Blake R. How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry. Perception 2002;31:813-824.
14. Blake R, Logothetis NK. Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:13-21.
15. Levelt WJ. On Binocular Rivalry. Institute for Perception RVO-TNO. Soesterberg: The Netherlands, 1965.
16. Breese BB. Binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev 1909;16:410-415.
17. Mueller TJ, Blake R. A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biol Cybern 1989;61:223-232.
18. Fahle M. Binocular rivalry: suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Res 1982;22:787-800.
19. Alais D, Blake R. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Res 1999;39:4341-4353.
20. Ichihara S, Goryo K. The effects of relative orientation of surrounding gratings on binocular rivalry and apparent brightness of central gratings. Jpn Psychol Res 1978, 20: 159-166.
21. Mapperson B, Lovegrove W. Orientation and spatial-frequency-specific surround effects on binocular rivalry. Bull Psychonomic Soc 1991, 29: 95-97.
22. Fukuda H, Blake R. Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992;18:362-370.
23. van Lier R, Wagemans J. Perceptual grouping measured by color assimilation: regularity versus proximity. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1997;97:37-70.
24. Wade NJ. Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours. Perception 1975;4:85-95.
25. Breese BB. On inhibition. Physiol Monogr 1899;3:1-65.
26. Kovacs I, Papathomas TV, Yang M, Feher A. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:15508-15511.
27. Gillam B, Blackburn S, Nakayama K. Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vision Res 1999;39:493-502.
28. Forte J, Peirce JW, Lennie P. Binocular integration of partially occluded surfaces. Vision Res 2002;42:1225-1235.
29. Howard I P, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
30. Ono H, Mapp AP, Howard IP. The cyclopean eye in vision: the new and old data continue to hit you right between the eyes. Vision Res 2002;42:1307-1324.
31. Nakayama K, Shimojo S. da Vinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Res 1990;30:1811-1825.
32. Shimojo S, Nakayama K. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Res 1990;30:69-80.
33. Blakemore C, Tobin EA. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 1972;15:439-440.
34. Knierim JJ , van Essen DC. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 1992;67:961-980.
35. Nelson JI, Frost BJ. Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field. Brain Res 1978;139:359-365.
36. Li W, Thier P, Wehrhahn C. Contextual influence on orientation discrimination of humans and responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:941-954.
37. Mareschal I, Sceniak MP, Shapley RM. Contextual influences on orientation discrimination: binding local and global cues. Vision Res 2001;41:1915-1930.
38. Snowden RJ, Hammett ST. The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination. Vision Res 1998;38:1935-1945.
39. Cannon MW, Fullenkamp SC. Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Res 1991;31:1985-1998.
40. Solomon JA, Sperling G, Chubb C. The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation. Vision Res 1993;33:2671-2683.
41. Rossi AF, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex of macaques. J Neurosci 2001;21:1698-1709.
42. Donis FJ, Heinemann EG, Chase S. Context effects in visual pattern recognition by pigeons. Percept Psychophys 1994;55:676-688.
43. Herzog MH, Fahle M. Effects of grouping in contextual modulation. Nature 2002;415:433-436.