Peripheral influences on motion integration in foveal vision are modulated by central local ambiguity and center-surround congruence

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 980-988

  Kozak, Lajos R ^a,b,c   Castelo Branco, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^c SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SYSTEM;

FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 59449095235     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2094     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Campos SH, Forjaz V, Kozak LR, Silva E, Castelo-Branco M. Quantitative phenotyping of chromatic dysfunction in Best macular dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:944-949.
2. Maia-Lopes S, Silva ED, Silva MF, Reis A, Faria P, Castelo-Branco M. Evidence of widespread retinal dysfunction in patients with Stargardt disease and morphologically unaffected carrier relatives. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1191-1199.
3. Castelo-Branco M, Mendes M, Silva MF, et al. Specific retinotopically based magnocellular impairment in a patient with medial visual dorsal stream damage. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:238-253.
4. Silva MF, Faria P, Regateiro FS, et al. Independent patterns of damage within magno-, parvo- and koniocellular pathways in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2005;128:2260-2271.
5. Castelo-Branco M, Mendes M, Sebastiao AR, et al. Visual phenotype in Williams-Beuren syndrome challenges magnocellular theories explaining human neurodevelopmental visual cortical disorders. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3720-3729.
6. Albright TD, Stoner GR. Contextual influences on visual processing. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2002;25:339-379.
7. Ben-Av MB, Shiffrar M. Disambiguating velocity estimates across image space. Vision Res. 1995;35:2889-2895.
8. Bonneh Y, Sagi D. Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection. Vision Res. 1998;38:3541-3553.
9. Lorenceau J, Giersch A, Series P. Dynamic competition between contour integration and contour segmentation probed with moving stimuli. Vision Res. 2005;45:103-116.
10. Westheimer G, Ley EJ. Spatial and temporal integration of signals in foveal line orientation. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:2677-2684.
11. Clifford CW, Harris JA. Contextual modulation outside of awareness. Curr Biol. 2005;15:574-578.
12. Kapadia MK, Ito M, Gilbert CD, Westheimer G. Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys. Neuron. 1995;15: 843-856.
13. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1985;8:407-430.
14. Levitt JB, Lund JS. Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature. 1997;387:73-76.
15. Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H, Yukie M, Fukada Y, Iwai E. Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1986;6:134-144.
16. Born RT, Tootell RB. Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature. 1992;357: 497-499.
17. Loffler G, Orbach HS. Modeling the integration of motion signals across space. J Opt Soc Am. 2003;20:1472-1489.
18. Li W, Gilbert CD. Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:2846-2856.
19. Stettler DD, Das A, Bennett J, Gilbert CD. Lateral connectivity and contextual interactions in macaque primary visual cortex. Neuron. 2002;36:739-750.
20. Betts LR, Taylor CP, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ. Aging reduces center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Neuron. 2005; 45:361-366.
21. Paffen CL, Tadin D, te Pas SF, Blake R, Verstraten FA. Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 2006;46:599-604.
22. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Gilroy LA, Blake R. Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature. 2003;424:312-315.
23. Adelson EH, Movshon JA. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature. 1982;300:523-525.
24. Stoner GR, Albright TD, Ramachandran VS. Transparency and coherence in human motion perception. Nature. 1990;344:153-155.
25. Castelo-Branco M, Formisano E, Backes W, et al. Activity patterns in human motion-sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13914-13919.
26. Leopold DA, Wilke M, Maier A, Logothetis NK. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:605-609.
27. Alais D, van der Smagt MJ, Verstraten FA, van de Grind WA. The perceived direction of textured gratings and their motion aftereffects. Perception. 1995;24:1383-1396.
28. Hupe JM, Rubin N. The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res. 2003;43: 531-548.
29. Alais D, Wenderoth P, Burke D. The size and number of plaid blobs mediate the misperception of type-II plaid direction. Vision Res. 1997;37:143-150.
30. Silva MF, Maia-Lopes S, Mateus C, et al. Retinal and cortical patterns of spatial anisotropy in contrast sensitivity tasks. Vision Res. 2008;48:127-135.
31. Noest AJ, van den Berg AV. The role of early mechanisms in motion transparency and coherence. Spat Vision. 1993;7:125-147.
32. Bayerl P, Neumann H. Disambiguating visual motion through contextual feedback modulation. Neur Comput. 2004;16:2041-2066.
33. Castelo-Branco M, Goebel R, Neuenschwander S, Singer W. Neural synchrony correlates with surface segregation rules. Nature. 2000; 405:685-689.
34. Gizzi MS, Katz E, Schumer RA, Movshon JA. Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1990;63: 1529-1543.
35. Movshon JA, Adelson EH, Gizzi MS, Newsome WT. The analysis of moving visual patterns. In: Chagas C, Gattass R, Gross C, eds. Pattern Recognition Mechanisms. Rome: Vatican Press; 1985: 117-151.
36. Guo K, Benson PJ, Blakemore C. Pattern motion is present in V1 of awake but not anaesthetized monkeys. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19: 1055-1066.
37. Schmidt KE, Castelo-Branco M, Goebel R, Payne BR, Lomber SG, Galuske RA. Pattern motion selectivity in population responses of area 18. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:2363-2374.
38. Smith AT, Snowden RJ, Milne AB. Is global motion really based on spatial integration of local motion signals? Vision Res. 1994;34: 2425-2430.
39. Pack CC, Gartland AJ, Born RT. Integration of contour and terminator signals in visual area MT of alert macaque. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3268-3280.
40. Alais D, Blake R. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 1999;39:4341-4353.
41. Blake R, Logothetis NK. Visual competition. Nat Rev. 2002;3:13-21.
42. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev. 1989; 96:145-167.
43. Laing CR, Chow CC. A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J Comput Neurosci. 2002;12:39 -53.
44. Bakin JS, Nakayama K, Gilbert CD. Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations. J Neurosci. 2000;20:8188-8198.