An exploratory study of engagement in a technology-supported substance abuse intervention

Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  VanDeMark, Nancy R ^a   Burrell, Nicole R ^b   LaMendola, Walter F ^a   Hoich, Catherine A ^c   Berg, Nicole P ^b   Medina, Eugene ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b Colorado Social Research Associates ^*  (United States)

^c Arapahoe House Colorado   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77953125489     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1747597X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-10     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. , http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k8nsduh/2k8Results.cfm#7.3
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change 2002, New York: The Guilford Press, 2.
3. U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Abuse Treatment 1999, Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration;, U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services.
4. Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technology: Using computers to change what we think and do 2003, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Alemi F, Haack MR, Nemes S, Aughburns R, Sinkule J, Neuhauser D. Therapeutic emails. Substance Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2007, 2.
6. Alemi F, Stephens RC, Javalghi RG, Dyches H, Butts J, Ghadiri A. A randomized trial of telecommunications network for pregnant women who use cocaine. Med Care 1996, 34:OS10-OS20.
7. Ruggiero KJ, Resnick HS, Acierno R, Coffey SF, Carpenter MJ, Ruscio AM, Stephens RS, Kilpatrick DG, Stasiewicz PR, Roffman RA, et al. Internet-based intervention for mental health and substance use problems in the aftermath of mass violence and disasters: a pilot feasibility study. Behav Ther 2006, 37:190-205. 10.1016/j.beth.2005.12.001, 16942971.
8. Hester RK, Miller JH. Computer-based tools for diagnosis and treatment of alcohol problems. Alcohol Res Health 2006, 29:36-40.
9. Lieberman DZ, Huang SW. A technological approach to reaching a hidden population of problem drinkers. Psychiatr Serv 2008, 59:297-303. 10.1176/appi.ps.59.3.297, 18308911.
10. Bischof G, Grothues JM, Reinhardt S, Meyer C, Ulrich J, Rumpf H-J. Evaluation of a telephone-based stepped care intervention for alcohol-related disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008, 93:244-251. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.003, 18054443.
11. Riper H, Kramer J, Smit F, Conijin B, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial. Addiction 2008, 103:218-227. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02063.x, 18199300.
12. Copeland J, Martin G. Web-based interventions for substance use disorders: a qualitative review. Subst Abuse Treat 2004, 26:109-116.
13. Griffiths M. Online therapy for addictive behaviors. CyberPsychol Behav 2005, 8:555-561. 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.555, 16332166.
14. Carroll K, Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio TA, Rounsaville BJ. Enduring effects of a computer-assisted training program for cognitive behavioral therapy: a 6-month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009, 100:178-181. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015, 2742309, 19041197.
15. Postel MG, De Jong CAJ, De Haan HA. Does e-therapy for problem drinking reach hidden populations?. Am J Psychiatry 2005, 162:2393. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2393, 16330613.
16. King V, Stoller KB, Kidorf M, Kindbom K, Hursch S, Brady T, Brooner RK. Assessing the effectiveness of an internet-based videoconferencing platform for delivering intensified substance abuse counseling. Subst Abuse Treat 2009, 36:331-338.
17. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003, 27:S227-232.
18. Rimer B, Kreuter MW. Advancing tailored health communication: a persuasion and message effects perspective. J Commun 2006, 56:S184-201.
19. Dijkstra A, De Vries H. The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Educ Couns 1999, 36:193-203. 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00135-9, 10223023.
20. Lustria MA, Cortese J, Noar SM, Gleuckauf RL. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 74:156-173. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.023, 18947966.
21. Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Prev Med 2008, 47:3-16. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.014, 2572996, 18403003.
22. Wantland DJ, Potillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2004, 6:e40. 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40, 1550624, 15631964.
23. Ondersma SJ, Chase SK, Svikis DS, Schuster CR. Computer-based brief motivational intervention for perinatal drug use. Subst Abuse Treat 2005, 28:305-312.
24. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to the addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992, 47:1102-1114,. 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102, 1329589.
25. DiClemente CC, Velasquez MM. Motivational interviewing and stages of change. Motivational Interviewing 2002, 201-216. New York: Guilford Press, Miller WR, Rollnick S, 2.
26. Carroll K, Ball SA, Niche C, Martino S, Frankforter TL, Farentinos C, Kunkel LE. Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: a multisite effectiveness study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006, 81:301-312. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.002, 2386852, 16169159.
27. Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Dunn C. The efficacy of motivational interviewing. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing people for change 2002, 217-250. New York: Guilford Press, Miller WR, Rollnick S, 2.
28. Dunn C, Derro L, Rivara FP. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review. Addiction 2001, 96:1725-1742. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961217253.x, 11784466.
29. Zweben A, Zuckoff A. Motivational interviewing and treatment adherence. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change 2002, 299-319. New York: Guilford Press, Miller WR, Rollnick S.
30. Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005, 1:91-111. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143833, 17716083.
31. Ijsselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Midden C, Eggen B, van den Hoven E. Persuasive Technology: First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being, PERSUASIVE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series 3962; Eindhoven, The Netherlands 2006, Springer.
32. Ley BL. live Les roses!: the architecture of commitment in an online pregnancy and mothering group. Computer-Mediated Commun 2007, 12:1388-1408.
33. Short J, Williams W, Christie B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications 1976, London: Wiley & Sons;.
34. Biocco F, Harms C, Burgoon JK. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence 2003, 12:456-480.
35. Gunawardena CN, Zittle FJ. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am J Distance Educ 1997, 11:8-26.
36. Richardson JC, Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. J Asynchonous Learn Netw 2003, 7:68-88.
37. Grolleman J, van Dijk EMAG, Nijholt A, van Emst A. Break the habit! Designing an e-therapy intervention using a virtual coach in aid of smoking cessation. First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being, PERSUASIVE 2006; 18-19 May Eindover, The Netherlands 2006, Springer, IJssselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Eggen B, Van den Hoven E.
38. Walters S, Hester RK, Chiauzzi EM, Miller E. Demon rum: High tech solutions to an age-old problem. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005, 29:270-277. 10.1097/01.ALC.0000153543.03339.81, 15714050.
39. DiClemente CC, Hughes SO. Stages of change profiles in alcoholism treatment. Subst Abuse Treat 1990, 2:217-235.
40. CSAT GPRA Government Performance and Results Act. , https://www.samhsa-gpra.samhsa.gov/
41. Ryan RM, Plant RW, O'Malley SS. Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: Relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement and dropout. Addic Behav 1995, 20:279-297.
42. Ferron JC. Psychological Mechanisms to Treatment Adherence among People with Severe Mental illness: Validating Treatment Motivation and Working Alliance Measures. 2007, University of North Carolina School of Social Work.
43. Garnick DW, Lee MT, Horgan CM, Acevedo A. Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems. Subst Abuse Treat 2009, 36:265-277.
44. Fox S. Health Information Online 2005, Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
45. Finkelstein N. Using the relational model as a context for treating pregnant and parenting chemically dependent women. Chemical Dependency: Women at Risk 1996, 23-44. New York: Hayworth Press, Underhill BL, Finnegan DG.