Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 122-131

  Tannast, Moritz ^a,b   Kubiak Langer, Monika ^b   Langlotz, Frank ^b   Puls, Marc ^b   Murphy, Stephen B ^a   Siebenrock, Klaus A ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Femoroacetabular impingement; Range of motion; Simulation; Three dimensional computer tomography

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FEMOROAETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HIP; HIP ARTHROSCOPY; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; LIMB DISEASE; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33846098141     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20309     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. 2003. Femoroacetabular Impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:1-9.
2. Murphy SB, Tannast M, Kim YJ, et al. 2004. Debridement of the adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:178-181.
3. Tanzer M, Noiseux N. 2004. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:170-177.
4. Reynolds D, Lucac J, Klaue K. 1999. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg 81B: 281-288.
5. Siebenrock KA, Schöniger R, Ganz R. 2003. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion and its treatment by periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 85A:278-286.
6. Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, et al. 2001. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: A MRI based quantitative study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:171-176.
7. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. 2001. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip. A technique with full access to femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:1119-1124.
8. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. 2004. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Part I: Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:61-66.
9. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, et al. 1998. The Otto Aufranc Award: Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:8-22.
10. Tannast M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA, et al. 2005. Anatomical referencing of prosthetic cup orientation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:144-150.
11. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, et al. 1987. Femoral Anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:1169-1176.
12. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D. 2000. Computer-Assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Oper Techn Orthop 10:25-39.
13. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stöcklin CH, et al. 2002. The contour of the femoral head-neck-junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:556-560.
14. Montgomery AA, Graham A, Evans PH, et al. 2002. Interrater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference. BMC Health Serv Res 26:1-8.
15. Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, et al. 2005. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 23:1286-1292.
16. Wilson DC, Maedler B, Duncan CP, et al. 2006. Assessing cartilage health with three-dimensional dGEMRIC in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. 52nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, March 19-22, Chicago, IL.
17. Richolt JA, Teschner M, Everett PC, et al. 1999. Impingement simulation of the hip in SCFE using 3D models. Comput Aided Surg 4:144-151.
18. Sugano N, Yamanashi W, Sasama T, et al. 2003. Ranges of motion in anatomically normal hips using computer collision detection. 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, February 2-5, New Orleans, LA.
19. Ito K, Abdel-Hafiz E, Leunig M, et al. 1998. A computational model for the assessment of hip joint range of motion based on MRI. 11th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics, July 9-11, Toulouse.
20. Kang M, Sadri H, Moccozet L, et al. 2002. Accurate simulation of hip joint range of motion. Proc IEEE Comput Animation 215-219.
21. Wiberg G. 1939. The anatomy and roentgenographic appearance of a normal hip joint. Acta Chir Scand 83 Suppl:7-38.
22. Tönnis D. 1987. General radiography of the hip joint. In: Tönnis D, editor. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; p. 100-142.
23. Tönnis D, Heinecke A. 1999. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 81A:1747-1770.
24. Idelberger K, Frank A. 1952. Über eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Pfannendachwinkels bei Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 82:571-577. [In German]
25. Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, et al. 2004. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Part II: Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:67-73.
26. Murphy SB, Ganz R, Müller ME. 1995. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:985-989.
27. Pitt MJ, Graham AR, Shipman JH, et al. 1982, Hernitation pit of the femoral neck. Am J Roentgenol 138:1115-1121.
28. Goodman DA, Feighan JE, Smith AD, et al. 1997. Subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Relationship to osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 79A:1489-1497.
29. Tönnis D. 1987. Clinical and radiographic schemes for evaluating therapeutic results. In: Tönnis D, editor. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; p 165-171.
30. Tönnis D. 1994. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of x-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:581-584.
31. Brückl L. 1992. Angeborene Deformitäten im Bereich der Hüftgelenke. In: Jäger M, Wirth CJ, editors. Praxis der Orthopädie. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; p 854-887. [In German]
32. Fitzgerald RH. 1995. Acetabular labral tears. Clin Orthop 311:60-68.
33. Greene WB. 1994. The hip. In: Greene WB, Heckman JD, editors. The clinical measurement of joint motion. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; p 99-114.
34. Adler R, Hemmeler W. 1992. Untersuchung der Beine. In: Adler R, Hemmeler W, editors. Anamnese und Körperuntersuchung. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; p 119-130. [In German]
35. Booher JM, Thibodeau GA. 2000. Thigh and hip injuries. In: Booher JM, Thibodeau GA, editors. Athletic injury assessment. Boston: McGraw Hill; p 363-388.
36. Dahmer J. 2002. Extremitäten und Wirbelsäule. In: Dahmer J, editor. Anamnese und Befund. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; p 318-343. [In German]
37. Debrunner AM. 2002. Orthopädische Diagnosetechnik. In: Debrunner AM, editor. Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; p 183-202. [In German]
38. Füessl HS. 2002. Untersuchung der unteren Extremität. In: Füessl HS, Middeke M, editors. Anamnese und Klinische Untersuchung. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; p 356-366. [In German]
39. Garvin KL, McKillip T. 1998. History and physical examination. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, editors. The adult hip. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; p 315-332.
40. Ahlberg A, Moussa M, Al Nahdi M. 1988. On geographical variations in the normal range of joint motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 234:229-231.
41. Boone DC, Azen SP. 1979. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 61A:756-759.
42. Roaas A, Andersson GB. 1982. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand 53:205-208.