The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors;Szacowanie prawdopodobieństwa złośliwości guza na postawie kombinacji testów we wstępnej diagnostyce różnicowej guzów jajnika

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 254-261

  Agata, Smoleń ^a   Norbert, Stachowicz ^a   Artur, Czekierowski ^a   Jan, Kotarski ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LUBLIN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Angiogenesis; Logistic regression; Ovarian carcinoma; Sonography

Indexed keywords

CA 125 ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CANCER STAGING; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVARY CYST; OVARY DISEASE; OVARY TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; POLAND; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; CA-125 ANTIGEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; OVARIAN CYSTS; OVARIAN DISEASES; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; POLAND; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, PULSED; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 77953114211     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Anic T, [et al.]. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Gynecol Oncol. 2000, 76, 28-32.
2. Bordes K, Bory A, Benchaib M, [et al.]. Reproducibility of transvaginal three-dimensional endometrial volume measurements with virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) during ovarian stimulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 19, 76-80.
3. Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, [et al.]. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990, 97, 922-929.
4. Tingulstad S, Hagen B, Skjeldestad F, [et al.]. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA-125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre-operative diagnosis of pelvic masses. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 103, 826-831.
5. Jaeschke R, Cook D, Guyatt G. Ocena artykułów na temat testów diagnostycznych. Cz. II - metody określania przydatności testu. Medycyna Praktyczna. 1998, 11, 184-191.
6. Hanley J, McNeil B. The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982, 143, 29-36.
7. Hanley J, McNeil B. A method of comparing of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983, 148, 839-843.
8. Zweig M, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993, 39, 561-577.
9. Panzer R, Black E, Griner P. Diagnostic strategies for common medical problems. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians. 1991.
10. Sackett D, Rennie D. The science and art of the clinical examination. JAMA. 1992, 267, 2650-2652.
11. Stanisz A. Przyste{ogonek}pny kurs statystyki z zastosowaniem STATISTICA PL na przykladach z medycyny. Tom II. Modele liniowe i nieliniowe. Kraków: Wyd. StatSoft. 2007.
12. Lubsen J, Pool J, van der Does E. A practical device for the application of diagnostic or prognostic function. Methods Inf Med. 1978, 17, 127-129.
13. Spaczynski M. Onkologia ginekologiczna. Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Medyczne Urban & Partner. 1997, 156.
14. Morgante G, la Marca A, Ditto A, [et al.]. Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999, 106, 524-527.
15. Asiam N, Tailor A, Lawton F, [et al.]. Prospective evaluation of three different models of pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000, 107, 1347-1353.
16. Ulusoy S, Akbayir O, Numanoglu C, [et al.]. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007, 96, 186-191.
17. Mol B, Boll D, DeKanter M, [et al.]. Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: an external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol. 2001, 80, 162-167.
18. Geomini P, Bremer G, Kruitwagen R, [et al.]. Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2005, 96, 1-9.
19. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne T, [et al.]. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 10, 41-47.
20. Timmerman D, Bourne T, Tailor A, [et al.]. A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: The development of a new logistic regression model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 181, 57-65.
21. Smoleń A, Czekierdowski A, Daniłoś J, [i wsp.]. Sonoangiografa i zastosowanie logistycznej analizy regresji w przedoperacyjnej charakterystyce guzów jajnika. Ginekol Pol. 2002, 73, 1053-1060.
22. Smoleń A, Szpurek D, Czekierdowski A, [i wsp.]. Ultrasonografia z kolorowym Dopplerem w charakterystyce guzów jajnika-porównanie modeli predykcyjnych z dwóch ośrodków. Ginekol Pol. 2003, 74, 863-871.
23. Szpurek D, Moszynski R, Smoleń A, [et al.]. Using logistic regression analysis in preliminary differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005, 15, 817-823.
24. Timmmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne T, [et al.]. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 16, 500-505.
25. Timmerman D, Tesat A, Bourne T, [et al.]. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before the surgery: a multicenter study by the international ovarian tumor analysis group, J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23, 8794-8801.
26. Czekierdowski A. Zastosowanie ultrasonografii trójwymiarowej w róznicowaniu nowotworów jajnika. W: Ultrasonografia dopplerowska w położnictwie i ginekologii. Red. Bra{ogonek}zert J. Poznań: OWN. 2004, 185.
27. Czekierdowski A, Stachowicz N, Smoleń A, [i wsp.]. Zastosowanie ultrasonografii dopplerowskiej i sonoangiografi trójwymiarowej w badaniu unaczynienia i przepływu krwi w guzach przydatków macicy u kobiet. Ginekol Pol. 2006, 77, 296-306.
28. Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, Torashima M, [et al.]. Characterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol. 1997, 38, 572-577.
29. Alcázar J, Jurado M. Using logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology and color Doppler findings. Gynecol Oncol. 1998, 69, 146-150.
30. Czekierdowski A. Badania nad angiogeneza{ogonek} w łagodnych i złośliwych guzach jajnika przy zastosowaniu ultrasonografii z kolorowym Dopplerem oraz oceny ste{ogonek}żeń śródblonkowego czynnika wzrostu i wybranych markerów nowotworowych CA 125, CA72.4 i CA19.9. Rozprawa habilitacyjna. Lublin. Folium. 2000
31. Alcázar J, Errasti T, Laparte C, [et al.]. Assessment of a new logistic model in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2001, 20, 841-848.
32. Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Valentin L, [et al.]. External Validation of Mathematical Models to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Tumors: A Multicenter Study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 4440-4447.