Information systems appraisal and coping: The role of user perceptions

Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 107-126

  Fadel, Kelly J ^a   Brown, Susan A ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Appraisal; Coping; Information systems adoption; Post adoptive behavior; Technology acceptance; Use

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; INFORMATION USE;

APPRAISAL; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; COMPLEX INFORMATION SYSTEMS; COPING; FACILITATING CONDITIONS; INDIVIDUAL LEVELS; POST-ADOPTIVE BEHAVIOR; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 77953112413     PISSN: 15293181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.02606     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad (1997) The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies, Decision Sciences (28)3, pp. 557-582.
2. Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad (1998a) The Antecedents and Consequents of User Perceptions in Information Technology Adoption, Decision Support Systems (22)1, pp. 15-29.
3. Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad (1998b) A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology, Information Systems Research (9)2, pp. 204-215.
4. Ahmad, M.M. (2004) Psychometric Evaluation of the Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale with Patients with Prostate Cancer, Journal of Advanced Nursing (49)1, pp. 78-86.
5. Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50)2, pp. 179-211.
6. Arnetz, B.B. (1997) Technical Stress: Psychophysiological Aspects of Working with Modern Information Technology, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health (23)3, pp. 97-103.
7. Barclay, D., R. Thompson, and C. Higgins (1995) The Partial Least Squares (Pls) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration, Technology Studies (2)2, pp. 285-309.
8. Beaudry, A., and A. Pinsonneault (2005) Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation, MIS Quarterly (29)3, pp. 493-524.6p
9. Benbasat, I., and H. Barki (2007) Quo Vadis, Tam? Journal of the Association for Information Systems (8)4, pp. 212-218.
10. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation- Confirmation Model, MIS Quarterly (25)3, pp. 351-370.
11. Bhattacherjee, A., J. Perols, and C. Sanford (2008) Information Technology Continuance: A Theoretic Extension and Empirical Test, Journal of Computer Information Systems (49)1, pp. 17-26.
12. Boudreau, M.-C., and L. Seligman (2005) Quality of Use of a Complex Technology: A Learning-Based Model, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (17)4, pp. 1-22.6p
13. Brown, S.A., et al. (2002) Do I Really Have To? User Acceptance of Mandated Technology, European Journal of Information Systems (11)4, pp. 283-295.
14. Campbell, D.T., and D.W. Fiske (1959) Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix, Psych. Bulletin (56)2, pp. 81-105.
15. Chin, W., and P. Newsted (1999) Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares, in R. Hoyle (ed.) Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 307-341.
16. Chin, W.W. (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, in G.A. Marcoulides (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, London, pp. 295-336.
17. Chin, W.W., and B.L. Marcolin (2001) The Future of Diffusion Research, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems (32)3, pp. 8-12.
18. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Compeau, D.R., and C.A. Higgins (1995) Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test, MIS Quarterly (19)2, pp. 189-211.
20. Coyne, J.D., C. Aldwin, and R.S. Lazarus (1981) Depression and Coping in Stressful Episodes, Journal of Abnormal Psychology (90)5, pp. 439-477.
21. Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly (13)3, pp. 319-340.
22. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw (1989) User Acceptance of Computer-Technology-A Comparison of Two Theoretical-Models, Management Science (35)8, pp. 982-1003.
23. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw (1992) Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology (22)14, pp. 1111-1132.
24. De Sousa, R.M.D. (2005) Complex Information Technology Usage: Toward Higher Levels Through Exploratory Use-The Erp Systems Case, Atlanta: The University of Georgia.
25. Dishaw, M.T., and D.M. Strong (1999) Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs, Information & Management (36)1, pp. 9-21.
26. Folkman, S., and R.S. Lazarus (1985) If It Changes It Must Be a Process: Study of Emotion and Coping During Three Stages of a College Examination, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (48)1, pp. 150-170.
27. Folkman, S., et al. (1986a) Dynamics of a Stressful Encounter: Cognitive Appraisal, Coping, and Encounter Outcomes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (50)5, pp. 992-1003.
28. Folkman, S., et al. (1986b) Appraisal, Coping, Health Status, and Psychological Symptoms, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (50)3, pp. 571-579.
29. Fornell, C., and D. Larcker (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research (18)2, pp. 39-50.
30. Gallivan, M.J., V.K. Spitler, and M. Koufaris (2005) Does Information Technology Training Really Matter? A Social Information Processing Analysis of Coworkers' Influence on It Usage in the Workplace, Journal of Management Information Systems (22)1, pp. 153-192.6p
31. Gefen, D., and D. Straub (2005) A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using Pls-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems (16)5, pp. 91-109.
32. Gefen, D., D. Straub, and M. Boudreau (2000) Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice, Communications of AIS (7)7, pp. 1-78.6p
33. Goodhue, D.I., and R.L. Thompson (1995) Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly (19)2, pp. 213-236.
34. th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.6p
35. Hartwick, J., and H. Barki (1994) Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use, Management Science (40)4, pp. 440-465.
36. Jasperson, J., P.E. Carter, and R.W. Zmud (2005) A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems, MIS Quarterly (29)3, pp. 525-558.
37. Kahn, H., and C.L. Cooper (1986) Computing Stress, Current Psychological Research & Reviews (5)2, pp. 148-162.
38. Karahanna, E., D.W. Straub, and N.L. Chervany (1999) Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs, MIS Quarterly (23)2, pp. 183-213.
39. Karasek, R.A. (1979) Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign,Administrative Science Quarterly (24)2, pp. 285-308.
40. Karasek, R.A., and T. Theorell (1990) Health Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
41. Kelman, H.C. (1958) Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change, Journal of Conflict Resolution (2)1, pp. 51-60.
42. Kessler, T.A. (1998) The Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation, Research in Nursing & Health (21)1, pp. 73-82.
43. Kimberly, J.R. (1987) Organizational and Contextual Influences on the Diffusion of Technological Innovation, in New Technology as Organizational Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
44. Korunka, C., and O. Vitouch (1999) Effects of Implementation of Information Technology on Employees' Strain and Job Satisfaction: A Context-Dependent Approach, Work & Stress (13)4, pp. 341-363.
45. Korunka, C., S. Zauchner, and A. Weiss (1997) New Information Technologies, Job Profiles, and External Workload as Predictors of Subjectively Experienced Stress and Dissatisfaction at Work, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (9)4, pp. 407-424.
46. Lapointe, L., and S. Rivard (2007) A Triple Take on Information System Implementation, Organization Science (18)1, pp. 89-107.
47. Lazarus, R.S., and S. Folkman (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
48. Lee, Y., and K.R. Larsen (2009) Threat or Coping Appraisal: Determinants of SMB Executives' Decision to Adopt Anti-Malware Software, European Journal of Information Systems (18)2, pp. 177-187.
49. Lewis, W., R. Agarwal, and V. Sambamurthy (2003) Sources of Influence on Beliefs About Information Technology Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers, MIS Quarterly (27)4, pp. 657-678.
50. Liang, H., and Y. Xue (2009) Avoidance of Information Technology Threats: A Theoretical Perspective, MIS Quarterly (33)1, pp. 71-90.
51. Lindell, M.K., and D.J. Whitney (2001) Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs, Journal of Applied Psychology (86)1, pp. 114-121.
52. Loch, K.D., D.W. Straub, and S. Kamel (2003) Diffusing the Internet in the Arab World: The Role of Social Norms and Technological Culturation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (50)1, pp. 45-63.
53. Lowry, P.B., et al. (2009) The Cmc Interactivity Model: How Interactivity Enhances Communication Quality and Process Satisfaction in Lean-Media Groups, Journal of Management Information Systems (26)1, pp. 155-195.
54. Mabert, V.A., A. Soni, and M.A. Venkataramanan (2001) Enterprise Resource Planning: Common Myths Versus Evolving Reality, Business Horizons (44)3, pp. 69-76.
55. Majchrzak, A., R.E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King, et al. (2000) Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team, MIS Quarterly (24)4, pp. 569-600.
56. Malhotra, N.K., S.S. Kim, and A. Patil (2006) Common Method Variance in Is Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research, Management Science (52)12, pp. 1865-1883.
57. Marakas, G.M., R.D. Johnson, and P.F. Clay (2007) The Evolving Nature of the Computer Self-Efficacy Construct: An Empirical Investigation of Measurement Construction, Validity, Reliability, and Stability over Time, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (8)1, pp. 16-46.
58. Markus, M.L., (1983) Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation, Communications of the ACM (26), pp. 430-444.
59. McRae, R.R. (1984) Situation Determinants of Coping Responses: Loss, Threat, and Challenge, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (46)4, pp. 919-928.
60. Moore, G.C., and I. Benbasat, Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research (September 1991), pp. 192-223.
61. Nambisan, S., R. Agarwal, and M. Tanniru (1999) Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology, MIS Quarterly (23)3, pp. 365-396.
62. Newman, M., and R. Sabherwal (1996) Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation, MIS Quarterly (20)1, pp. 23-54.
63. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. Parkes, K.R. (1984) Locus of Control, Cognitive Appraisal, and Coping in Stressful Episodes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (46)3, pp. 655-668.
65. Petter, S., D.W. Straub, and A. Rai (2007) Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly (31)4, pp. 623-656.
66. Raykov, T., and D.A. Grayson (2003) A Test for Change of Composite Reliability in Scale Development, Multivariate Behavioral Research (38)2, pp. 143-159.
67. Robey, D., J.W. Ross, and M.-C. Boudreau (2002) Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change, Journal of Management Information Systems (19)1, pp. 17-46.
68. Salanova, M., and W.B. Schaufeli (2000) Exposure to Information Technology and Its Relation to Burnout, Behaviour & Information Technology (19)5, pp. 385-392.
69. Shen, Y., and M. Gallivan, An Empirical Test of the Job Demand/control Model among IT Users, ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Tucson, AZ, 2004, pp. 39-47.
70. Taylor, S., and P. Todd, (1995a) Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience, MIS Quarterly 19:4, pp. 561-570.
71. Taylor, S., and P.A. Todd, (1995b) Understanding Information Technology Uusage-A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research 6:2, pp. 144-176.
72. Thompson, R.L., C.A. Higgins, and J.M. Howell (1991) Personal Computing: Toward Utilization: a Conceptual Model of, MIS Quarterly (15)1, pp. 125-142.
73. Thompson, R.L., C.A. Higgins, and J.M. Howell (1994) Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model, Journal of Management Information Systems (11)1, pp. 167-187.
74. Triandis, H.C., Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values, Lincoln, NE, 1979, pp. 195-259.
75. Van der Doef, M. and S. Maes (1999) The Job-Demand-Control-Support Model of Psychological Well-Being: A Review of 20 Years of Empirical Research, Work & Stress (13)2, pp. 87-114.
76. Venkatesh, V. (1999) Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation, MIS Quarterly (23)2, pp. 239-260.
77. Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala (2008) Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, Decision Sciences (39)2, pp. 273-315.
78. Venkatesh, V., and F.D. Davis (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science (46)2, pp. 186-204.
79. Venkatesh, V., et al. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly (27)3, pp. 425-478.
80. Wei, W., et al. (2008) Innovate with Complex Information Technologies: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Examination, Journal of Computer Information Systems (49)1, pp. 27-36.
81. Werts, C.E., R.L. Linn, and K.G. Joreskog (1974) Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions, Educational Psychology Measurement (34)1, pp. 25-33.
82. Zuboff, S. (1988) In the Age of Smart Machines: Basic Books.