Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study

Biological Psychology

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 318-324

  Tacikowski, Pawel ^a   Nowicka, Anna ^a  

^a NENCKI INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Motivational attention; P300; Self recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELF CONCEPT; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NAMES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SELF CONCEPT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953028879     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Armony J.L., Dolan R.J. Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli: an event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:817-826.
2. Arnell K.A., Shapiro K.L., Sorenses R.E. Reduced repetition blindness for one's own name: evidence for conceptual representations. Visual Cognition 1999, 6:609-635.
3. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation 1995, 7:1129-1159.
4. Berlad I., Pratt H. P300 in response to subject's own name. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1995, 96:472-474.
5. Brédart S., Delchambre M., Laureys S. One's own face is hard to ignore. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:46-52.
6. Briggs K.E., Martin F.H. Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: arousal and valence effects in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2009, 72:299-306.
7. Bundesen C., Kyllinsbaek S., Houmann K.J., Jensen R.M. Is visual attention automatically attracted to one's own name?. Perception and Psychophysics 1997, 59:714-720.
8. Cherry E.C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1953, 25:975-979.
9. Cuthbert B.N., Schupp H.T., Bradley M.M., Birbaumer N., Lang P.J. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology 2000, 52:95-111.
10. Dietrich D.E., Waller C., Johannes S., Wieringa B.M., Emrich H.M., Muente T.F. Differential effects of emotional content on event-related potentials in word recognition memory. Neuropsychobiology 2001, 43:96-101.
11. Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychological Reviews 1963, 70:80-90.
12. Devue C., Brédart S. Attention to self referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face?. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128:290-297.
13. Devue C., Van der Stigchel S., Brédart S., Theeuwes J. You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer. Cognition 2009, 111:114-122.
14. Dolan R.J. Emotion, cognition, behavior. Science 2002, 298:1191-1194.
15. Eimer M. Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology 2000, 111:694-705.
16. Fischer C., Dailler F., Morlet D. Novelty P3 elicited by the subject's own name in comatose patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119:2224-2230.
17. Folmer R.L., Yingling C.D. P300 in response to name stimuli. Brain and Language 1997, 56:306-311.
18. Foti D., Hajcak G., Dien J. Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:521-530.
19. Gevins A., Cutillo B., Smith M.E. Regional modulation of high resolution evoked potentials during verbal and non-verbal matching tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1995, 94:129-147.
20. Gevins A., Smith M.E., Le J., Leong H., Bennet J., Martin N., McEvoy L., Du R., Whitfield S. High resolution evoked potential imaging of the cortical dynamics of human working memory. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996, 98:327-348.
21. Gray H.M., Ambady N., Lowenthal W.T., Deldin P. P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2004, 40:216-224.
22. Gronau N., Cohen A., Ben-Shakhar G. Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distracters inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 132(4):512-529.
23. Harris C.R., Pashler H. Attention and the processing of emotional words and names: not so special after all. Psychological Science 2004, 15:171-178.
24. Holeckova I., Fischer C., Giard M.H., Delpuech C., Morlet D. Brain responses to subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Research 2006, 1082:142-152.
25. Isreal J.B., Chesney G.L., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence from multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology 1980, 17:259-273.
26. Johnson R. The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: review and synthesis. Advances in Physiology 1988, 3:69-137.
27. Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:90-97.
28. Johnston V.S., Miller D.R., Burleson M.H. Multiple P300s to emotional stimuli and their theoretical significance. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:684-694.
29. Johnston V.S., Oliver-Rodriguez J.C. Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. Journal of Sex Research 1997, 20:165-173.
30. Jung T., Makeig S., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Courchesne E., Sejnowski T. Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Human Brain Mapping 2001, 14:166-185.
31. Kawahara J., Yamada Y. Does one's own name attract visual attention?. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:997-1017.
32. Kanwisher N., Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized in the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2006, 361:2109-2128.
33. Keil A., Bradley M.H., Hauk O., Rockstroh B., Elbert T.R., Lang P.J. Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture viewing. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:641-649.
34. Kramer A.F., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. Processing of stimulus properties: evidence from dual-task integrality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:393-408.
35. Laarni J., Koljonen M., Kuistio A.M., Kyröläinen S., Lempiäinen J., Lepistö T. Images of a familiar face do not capture attention under conditions of inattention. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2000, 90:1216-1218.
36. Lang P.J., Bradley M.M., Cuthbert B.N. Motivated attention: affect, activation, and action. Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes 1997, 97-135. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Manhwah, New Jersey. P.J. Lang, R.F. Simons, M.T. Balaban (Eds.).
37. Mogg K., Bradley B.P., de Bono J., Painter M. Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1997, 35:297-303.
38. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959, 11:56-60.
39. Müller H.M., Kutas M. What's in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns and proper names and one's own name. NeuroReport 1996, 8:221-225.
40. Öhman A., Flykt A., Esteves F. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 2001, 130:466-478.
41. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-114.
42. Perrin F., García-Larrea L., Mauguiere F., Bastuji H. A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110:2153-2164.
43. Perrin F., Maquet P., Peigneux P., Ruby P., Degueldre C., Balteau E., Del Fiore G., Moonen G., Luxen A., Laureys S. Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: a combined ERPs and PET study. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:12-19.
44. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2128-2148.
45. Schupp H.T., Junghöfer M., Weike A.I., Hamm A.O. The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis. Psychophysiology 2003, 41:441-449.
46. Scott L.S., Luciana M., Wewerka S., Nelson C.A. Electrophysiological correlates of facial self-recognition in adults and children. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament (Romanian Journal-Translation: Cognition, Brain, Behavior) 2005, 9:211-238.
47. Shapiro K.L., Caldwell J., Sorensen R.E. Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual cocktail party effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Humans Perception and Performance 1997, 23:504-514.
48. Sui J., Zhu Y., Han S. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study. NeuroReport 2006, 17(4):423-427.
49. Tong F., Nakayama K. Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Humans Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1016-1035.
50. Webb S.J., Dawson G., Bernier R., Panagiotides H. ERP evidence of atypical face processing in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2006, 36:881-890.
51. Wickens C., Kramer A., Vanasse L., Donchin E. Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources. Science 1983, 221:1080-1082.
52. Wolford G., Morrison F. Processing of unattended visual information. Memory and Cognition 1980, 8:521-527.
53. Wood N., Cowan N. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are the attention shifts to one's own name in an irrelevant auditory channel. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory and Cognition 1995, 21:255-260.