Is visual attention automatically attracted by one's own name?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 714-720

  Bundesen, Claus ^a   Kyllingsbæk, Søren ^a   Houmann, Kristján Jul ^a   Jensen, Rune MØller ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOMENCLATURE; PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMES; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031178410     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206017     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ALLPORT, D. A. (1977). On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 505-534). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BROADBENT, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
3. BUNDESEN, C. (1987). Visual attention: Race models for selection from multielement displays. Psychological Research, 49, 113-121.
4. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
5. BUNDESEN, C. (1993). The relationship between independent race models and Luce's choice axiom. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 446-471.
6. BUNDESEN, C., PEDERSEN, L. F., & LARSEN, A. (1984). Measuring efficiency of selection from briefly exposed visual displays: A model for partial report. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 329-339.
7. BUNDESEN, C., SHIBUYA, H., & LARSEN, A. (1985). Visual selection from multielement displays: A model for partial report. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 631-649). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. CHRISTIE, J., & KLEIN, R. (1995). Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? Memory & Cognition. 23, 547-550.
9. CZERWINSKI, M., LIGHTFOOT, N., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1992). Automatization and training in visual search. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271-315.
10. DEUTSCH, J. A., & DEUTSCH, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
11. DUNCAN, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
12. DUNCAN, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 85-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271 -295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. HOFFMAN, J. E. (1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 1-11.
15. JOHNSTON, W. A., HAWLEY, K. J., & FARNHAM, J. M. (1993). Novel popout: Empirical boundaries and tentative theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 140-153.
16. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
17. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
18. LOGAN, G. D. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 317-339.
19. MORAY, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56-60.
20. MORAY, N. (1969). Attention: Selective processes in vision and hearing. London: Hutchinson.
21. NORMAN, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522-536.
22. SCHNEIDER, W. (1985). Toward a model of attention and the development of automatic processing. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 475-492). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. SCHNEIDER, W., DUMAIS, S. T., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1-27). New York: Academic Press.
24. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
25. SHIBUYA, H. (1993). Efficiency of visual selection in duplex and conjunction conditions in partial report. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 716-732.
26. SHIBUYA, H., & BUNDESEN, C. (1988). Visual selection from multielement displays: Measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 591-600.
27. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & CZERWINSKI, M. P. (1988). A model of automatic attention attraction when mapping is partially consistent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 562-569.
28. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1981). The development of automatism. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 111-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. SHIFFRIN, R. M., DUMAIS, S. T., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1981). Characteristics of automatism. In J. Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 223-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
31. THEEUWES, J. (1995). Temporal and spatial characteristics of preattentive and attentive processing. Visual Cognition, 2, 221-233.
32. THEEUWES, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297-314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
34. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1981). Short-term visual information fargetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.
36. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1993). The role of position in object selection in vision. Psychological Research, 56, 44-58.
37. WINER, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
39. YANTIS, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.