Comparisons of urban travel forecasts prepared with the sequential procedure and a combined model

Networks and Spatial Economics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 135-148

  Siegel, Justin D ^a   De Cea, Joaquín ^b   Fernández, José Enrique ^b   Rodriguez, Renán E ^b   Boyce, David ^c  

^a MCT Ltda   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Combined network equilibrium models; Sequential procedure; Urban travel forecasting

Indexed keywords

ASSIGNMENT PROBLEMS; CURRENT PRACTICES; MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION; NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM MODELS; SEQUENTIAL PROCEDURES; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL FORECASTING; URBAN TRAVELS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 33646720471     PISSN: 1566113X     EISSN: 15729427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-006-7697-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abdulaal M, LeBlanc LJ (1979) Methods for combining modal split and equilibrium assignment models. Transp Sci 13:292-314
2. Abrahamsson T, Lundqvist L (1999) Formulation and estimation of combined network equilibrium models with applications to Stockholm. Transp Sci 33:80-100
3. Aashtiani HZ, Magnanti TL (1981) Equilibria on a congested transportation network. SIAM J Algebr Discrete Methods 2:213-226
4. Barquín M (1992) Análisis Comparativo de los Modelos de Transporte Secuencial y de Equilibrio Simultáneo. Memoria para optar al título de Ingeniero Civil. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
5. Beckmann M, McGuire CB, Winsten CB (1956) Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven
6. Boyce D (2002) Is the sequential travel forecasting paradigm counterproductive? ASCE J Urban Plann Dev 128:169-183
7. Boyce D, Bar-Gera H (2001) Network equilibrium models of travel choices with multiple classes. In: Lahr ML, Miller RE (eds) Regional science perspectives in economic analysis. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 85-98
8. Boyce D, Bar-Gera H (2003) Validation of urban travel forecasting models combining origin-destination, mode and route choices. J Reg Sci 43:517-540
9. Boyce D, Bar-Gera H (2004) Multiclass combined models for urban travel forecasting. Netw Spat Econ 4:115-124
10. Boyce D, Lupa M, Zhang Y (1994) Introducing feedback into four-step travel forecasting procedure versus equilibrium solution of combined model. Transp Res Rec 1443:65-74
11. De Cea J, Fernandez JE (2001) ESTRAUS: A simultaneous equilibrium model to analyze and evaluate multimodal urban transportation systems with multiple user classes. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Transport Research. Seoul, Korea
12. De Cea J, Fernandez JE, Dekock V, Soto A, Friesz TL (2003) ESTRAUS: A computer package for solving supply-demand equilibrium problems on multimodal urban transportation networks with multiple user classes. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, District of Columbia
13. Evans SP (1973) Some applications of optimisation theory in transport planning. PhD thesis, Traffic Studies, University College London, London
14. Evans SP (1976) Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignment. Transp Res 10:37-57
15. Florian M, Nguyen S (1978) A combined trip distribution, modal split and trip assignment model. Transp Res 12:241-246
16. Florian M, Nguyen S, Ferland J (1975) On the combined distribution-assignment of traffic. Transp Sci 9:43-53
17. Frank C (1978) A study of alternative approaches to combined trip distribution assignment modeling. PhD thesis, Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
18. Hasan MK, Safwat KNA (2000) Comparison of two transportation network equilibrium modeling approaches. ASCE J Transp Eng 126:35-40
19. Lam WHK, Huang H-J (1992) A combined trip distribution and assignment model for multiple user classes. Transp Res 26B:275-287
20. Lam WHK, Huang H-J (1994) Comparison of results of two models of transportation demand in Hong Kong: CDAM and a version of MicroTRIPS. J Adv Transp 28:107-126
21. Ortúzar J de D, Willumsen LG (2001) Modelling transport. Wiley, Chichester, UK
22. Safwat KNA, Magnanti TL (1988) A combined trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and trip assignment model. Transp Sci 22:14-30
23. Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
24. Williams HCWL, Lam WM (1991) Transport policy appraisal with equilibrium models. I. Generated traffic and highway investment benefits. Transp Res 25B:253-279
25. Williams HCWL, Lai HS (1991) Transport policy appraisal with equilibrium models. II. Model dependence of highway investment benefits. Transp Res 25B:281-292
26. Williams HCWL, Lam WM, Austin J, Kim KS (1991) Transport policy appraisal with equilibrium models. III. Investment benefits in multi-modal systems. Transp Res 25B:293-316