Differential diagnosis of breast lesions 5 mm or less: Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging?

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 456-464

  Dietzel, Matthias ^a   Baltzer, Pascal A ^a   Vag, Tibor ^a   Gröschel, Tobias ^a   Gajda, Mieczyslaw ^a   Camara, Oumar ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; BIRADS; Breast; Contrast agent; Foci; MRI; Pathology; Prognosis; Regression; Signs

Indexed keywords

MAGNETISM; MAMMOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESONANCE;

ACCURACY; BI-RADS; BREAST; CONTRAST AGENT; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; MR IMAGING; ODD RATIOS; PROGNOSE; REGRESSION; SIGN;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 77953013880     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d06b09     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.
2. Donegan WL. Tumor-related prognostic factors for breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:28-51.
3. DeMartini W, Lehman C. A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;19:143-150.
4. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, et al. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology. 2008;246:116-124.
5. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
6. Tardivon AA, Athanasiou A, Thibault F, et al. Breast imaging and reporting data system (BIRADS) : magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:212-215. (Pubitemid 46096699)
7. Fischer DR, Baltzer P, Malich A, et al. Is the "blooming sign" a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol. 2004;14:394-401.
8. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:964-970.
9. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:426-430.
10. Dietzel M, Baltzer P A T, Vag T, et al. The adjacent vessel sign in MR-mammography-new data and subgroup analysis in 1084 histologically verified cases. Korean J Radiol. 2010. In press.
11. Kaiser WA. Signs in MR-Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2007.
12. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-888.
13. Fischer DR, Malich A, Wurdinger S, et al. The adjacent vessel on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: W147-W151.
14. Baltzer P A T, Yang F, Dietzel M, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of unilateral edema on T2w-TSE sequences in MR-mammography considering 974 histologically verified lesions. Breast J. 2009. In press.
15. Coburn NG, Chung MA, Fulton J, et al. Decreased breast cancer tumor size, stage, and mortality in Rhode Island: an example of a well-screened population. Cancer Control. 2004;11:222-230.
16. Tabar L, Chen HH, Duffy SW, et al. A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10-14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study. Lancet. 2000;355:429-433.
17. Folkman J, Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:10931-10934.
18. Folkman J, Merler E, Abernathy C, et al. Isolation of a tumor factor responsible for angiogenesis. J Exp Med. 1971;133:275-288.
19. Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:1875-1887.
20. Schnall MD. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to early detection of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2001;3:17-21.
21. Tillman GF, Orel SG, Schnall MD, et al. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3413-3423.
22. Baltzer P A T, Renz DM, Herrmann KH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM) : clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1612-1620.
23. Baltzer P A T, Renz DM, Kullnig PE, et al. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM) : do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis? Acad Radiol. 2009;16:435-442.
24. Vag T, Baltzer PA, Renz DM, et al. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography. Clin Imaging. 2008;32:438-442.
25. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295-1303. (Pubitemid 46513295)
26. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248-3258.
27. Kuerer HM, Albarracin CT, Yang WT, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: state of the science and roadmap to advance the field. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:279-288.
28. Henson DE, Ries L, Freedman LS, et al. Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22, 616 cases of breast cancer. The basis for a prognostic index. Cancer. 1991;68:2142-2149.
29. Henson DE, Chu KC, Levine PH. Histologic grade, stage, and survival in breast carcinoma: comparison of African American and Caucasian women. Cancer. 2003;98:908-917.
30. Renz DM, Baltzer PA, Bottcher J, et al. Inflammatory breast carcinoma in magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:209-221.
31. Baltzer P A T, Freiberg C, Beger S, et al. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach. Acad Radiol. 2009.
32. Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP, et al. Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1732-1742.
33. Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ, et al. Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:10-18.
34. Warren R, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Technical aspects of breast MRI-do they affect outcomes? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1629-1638.
35. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000.