Technical aspects of breast MRI - Do they affect outcomes?

European Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1629-1638

  Warren, Ruth ^a   Ciatto, Stefano ^b   Macaskill, Petra ^c   Black, Richard ^a   Houssami, Nehmat ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b CANCER RESEARCH AND PREVENTION INSTITUTE ISPO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast MRI; Effectiveness; Technical parameters; Test performance

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

BREAST CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67349260100     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1341-6     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248-3258
2. Warren RM, Thompson D, Pointon LJ et al (2006) Evaluation of a prospective scoring system designed for a multicenter breast MR imaging screening study. Radiology 239:677-685
3. Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356-378
4. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas. American College of Radiology, Radford, VA
5. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (2000) How to review the evidence: Systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. NHMRC, Canberra
6. Rutter C, Gatsonis C (2001) A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 20:2865-2884
7. Macaskill P (2004) Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 59:925-932
8. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101-110
9. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1149-1157
10. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M (2002) Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1493-1501
11. Drew PJ, Chatterjee S, Turnbull LW et al (1999) Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:599-603
12. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R et al (1995) Breast tumors: Comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743-747
13. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110-119
14. Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Besnard AP, Muller SH, Gilhuijs KG (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: Impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393-1401
15. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830-849
16. Bagley FH (2004) The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:380-383, discussion 383
17. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK (2003) MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:901-910
18. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888
19. Orel S, Schnall M, Powell C et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: Effect of MR imaging and MR guided biopsy. Radiology 195:115-122
20. Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S et al (2002) The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 9:231-239
21. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T et al (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:417-424
22. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:501-507
23. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468-473
24. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2006) Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J OK State Med Assoc 99:505-515
25. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA et al (2005) MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 92:32-38
26. Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 142:441-445, discussion 445-447
27. Tan JE, Orel SG, Schnall MD, Schultz DJ, Solin LJ (1999) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging - guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment. Am J Clin Oncol 22:414-418
28. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C (2008) Breast MRI: Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18:1307-1318
29. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N (2005) Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: Trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236:789-800
30. Hoisington LA, Scherer DL, Berger KL (2007) Breast MR imaging: applications and pitfalls. Radiolog Techno 78:367-377
31. Brown J, Bryan S, Warren R (1996) Mammography screening: An incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms [see comments]. BMJ 312:809-812
32. Harvey SC, Geller B, Oppenheimer RG, Pinet M, Riddell L, Garra B (2003) Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1461-1467