Identification of attention and cognitive control networks in a parametric auditory fMRI study

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2075-2081

  Westerhausen, René ^a   Moosmann, Matthias ^a,b   Alho, Kimmo ^c   Belsby, Stein Ove ^a   Hämäläinen, Heikki ^d   Medvedev, Svyatoslav ^e   Specht, Karsten ^a,b   Hugdahl, Kenneth ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^e RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Attention control; Cognitive control; Dichotic listening; FMRI; Inter aural intensity difference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CINGULATE GYRUS; COGNITION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETRIC TEST; PARIETAL LOBE; POST HOC ANALYSIS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SENSORY STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OXYGEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952971122     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:170-177.
2. Berlin C.I., Lowe-Bell S.S., Cullen J.K., Thompson C.L., Stafford M.R. Is speech " special" ? Perhaps the temporal lobectomy patient can tell us. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1972, 52:702-705.
3. Bloch M.I., Hellige J.B. Stimulus intensity, attentional instructions, and the ear advantage during dichotic listening. Brain and Cognition 1989, 9:136-148.
4. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
5. Brett M., Anton J.J., Valabregue R., Poline J.P. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Neuroimage 2002, 16:497.
6. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review 1990, 97:523-547.
7. Carter C.S., van Veen V. Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:367-379.
8. Cate A.D., Herron T.J., Yund E.W., Stecker G.C., Rinne T., Kang X., et al. Auditory attention activates peripheral visual cortex. PLoS One 2009, 4:e4645.
9. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
10. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
11. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
12. Dosenbach N.U., Fair D.A., Cohen A.L., Schlaggar B.L., Petersen S.E. A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:99-105.
13. Duncan J., Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences 2000, 23:475-483.
14. Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Fossella J., Flombaum J.I., Posner M.I. The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage 2005, 26:471-479.
15. Foundas A.L., Corey D.M., Hurley M.M., Heilman K.M. Verbal dichotic listening in right and left-handed adults: Laterality effects of directed attention. Cortex 2006, 42:79-86.
16. Friston K.J., Zarahn E., Josephs O., Henson R.N., Dale A.M. Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 1999, 10:607-619.
17. Giesbrecht B., Woldorff M.G., Song A.W., Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage 2003, 19:496-512.
18. Hill K.T., Miller L.M. Auditory attentional control and selection during cocktail party listening. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:583-590.
19. Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening in the study of auditory laterality. The asymmetrical brain 2003, 441-475. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. K. Hugdahl, R.J. Davidson (Eds.).
20. Hugdahl K., Andersson L. The " forced-attention paradigm" in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: A comparison between adults and children. Cortex 1986, 22:417-432.
21. Hugdahl K., Rund B.R., Lund A., Asbjørnsen A., Egeland J., Landro N.I., et al. Attentional and executive dysfunctions in schizophrenia and depression: Evidence from dichotic listening performance. Biological Psychiatry 2003, 53:609-616.
22. Hugdahl K., Westerhausen R., Alho K., Medvedev S., Hämäläinen H. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 431:90-94.
23. Hugdahl K., Westerhausen R., Alho K., Medvedev S., Laine M., Hämäläinen H. Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2009, 50:11-22.
24. Jäncke L., Shah N.J., Posse S., Grosse-Ryuken M., Muller-Gartner H.W. Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:875-883.
25. Kastner S., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:315-341.
26. Knudsen E.I. Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:57-78.
27. Kompus K., Hugdahl K., Öhman A., Marklund P., Nyberg L. Distinct control networks for cognition and emotion in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience Letters 2009, 467:76-80.
28. Langers D.R., van Dijk P., Schoenmaker E.S., Backes W.H. fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness. Neuroimage 2007, 35:709-718.
29. Mansouri F.A., Tanaka K., Buckley M.J. Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: A clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 2009, 10:141-152.
30. Mevorach C., Shalev L., Allen H.A., Humphreys G.W. The left intraparietal sulcus modulates the selection of low salient stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:303-315.
31. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:167-202.
32. Molenberghs P., Mesulam M.M., Peeters R., Vandenberghe R.R. Remapping attentional priorities: Differential contribution of superior parietal lobule and intraparietal sulcus. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2703-2712.
33. Mostofsky S.H., Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:751-761.
34. Øie M., Hugdahl K. A 10-13 year follow-up of changes in perception and executive attention in patients with early-onset schizophrenia: A dichotic listening study. Schizophrenia Research 2008, 106:29-32.
35. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
36. Posner M.I., Rothbart M.K. Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:1-23.
37. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
38. Rimol L.M., Eichele T., Hugdahl K. The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant-vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:191-196.
39. Salmi J., Rinne T., Koistinen S., Salonen O., Alho K. Brain networks of bottom-up triggered and top-down controlled shifting of auditory attention. Brain Research 2009, 1286:155-164.
40. Shomstein S., Yantis S. Parietal cortex mediates voluntary control of spatial and nonspatial auditory attention. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:435-439.
41. Sigalovsky I.S., Melcher J.R. Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers. Hearing Research 2006, 215:67-76.
42. Simmonds D.J., Pekar J.J., Mostofsky S.H. Meta-analysis of go/no-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:224-232.
43. Tallus J., Hugdahl K., Alho K., Medvedev S., Hämäläinen H. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Brain Research 2007, 1185:195-200.
44. Treue S. Visual attention: The where, what, how and why of saliency. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003, 13:428-432.
45. Vandenberghe R., Gillebert C.R. Parcellation of parietal cortex: Convergence between lesion-symptom mapping and mapping of the intact functioning brain. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 199:171-182.
46. Walter B., Blecker C., Kirsch P., Sammer G., Schienle A., Stark R., et al. MARINA: An easy to use tool for the creation of masks for region of interest analyses. Neuroimage 2003, 19:e1899.
47. Westerhausen R., Moosmann M., Alho K., Medvedev S., Hämäläinen H., Hugdahl K. Top-down and bottom-up interaction: Manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage. Brain Research 2009, 1250:183-189.
48. Wu C.T., Weissman D.H., Roberts K.C., Woldorff M.G. The neural circuitry underlying the executive control of auditory spatial attention. Brain Research 2007, 1134:187-198.