Extending the mertonian norms: Scientists' subscription to norms of research

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 366-393

  Anderson, Melissa S ^a   Ronning, Emily A ^b   De Vries, Raymond ^c   Martinson, Brian C ^d  

^a Department of Higher Education ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d Health Partners Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952838031     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, M. S. (1996). Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute's Graduate Education Project. Journal of Information Ethics, 5(1), 15-33.
2. Anderson, M. S. (2000). Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(4), 443-461.
3. Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. S. (1994). The graduate student experience and subscription to the norms of science. Research in Higher Education, 35(3), 273-299.
4. Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 437-461.
5. Barnes, S. B., & Dolby, R. G. A. (1970). The scientific ethos: A deviant viewpoint. European Journal of Sociology, 11, 3-25.
6. Barber, B. (1952). Science and the social order. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
7. Braxton, J. M. (1986). The normative structure of science: Social control in the academic profession. In John C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, (Vol. II, pp. 309-357). New York: Agathon Press.
8. Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. (1999). Faculty Misconduct in Collegiate Teaching. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Christensen, P. N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D. C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1295-1309.
10. De Vries, R., Anderson, M. S., & Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 43-50.
11. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. Trans. K. E. Fields. New York: Free Press. (Original work published in 1912)
13. Gibbs, J. P. (1981) Norms, deviance, and social control: Conceptual matters. New York: Elsevier.
14. Hagstrom, W. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
15. Hess, D. J. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
16. Kanigel, R. (1986). Apprentice to genius: The making of a scientific dynasty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Krueger, R. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Louis, K. S., Anderson, M. S., & Earle, J. (1994). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 331-350.
20. Louis, K. S., Anderson, M. S., & Rosenberg, L. (1995). Academic misconduct and values: The department's influence. Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 393-422.
21. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738.
22. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006). Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 51-66.
23. Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
24. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Mitroff, I. I (1974a). Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 579-595.
27. Mulkay, M. J. (1976). Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information, 15(4/5), 637-656.
28. Mulkay, M. (1980). Interpretation and the use of rules: The case of the norms of science. In T. F. Gieryn (Ed.), Science and social structure: A Festscrift for Robert Merton, Series 2, 39 (111-125). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
29. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Watson, J. D. (1997). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
31. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In Neil J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 511-574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.