Normative Orientations of University Faculty and Doctoral Students

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 443-461

  Anderson, Melissa S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Countemorms; Faculty; Graduate education; Norms of academic research; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; ETHICS, INSTITUTIONAL; FACULTY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MINNESOTA; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0034303504     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0002-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Braxton, J.M. & Bayer, A.E. (1999) Faculty Misconduct in Collegiate Teaching, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
2. Merton, R.K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York.
3. Merton, R.K. (1942) Science and Technology in a Democratic Order, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1(1-2): 115-126.
4. Mitroff, I. (1974) Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: a case study of the ambivalence of scientists, American Sociological Review 39: 579-595.
5. Anderson, M.S. & Louis, K.S. (1994) The graduate student experience and subscription to the norms of science, Research in Higher Education 35(3): 273-299.
6. Barber, B. (1952) Science and the Social Order, Free Press, New York.
7. Braxton, J.M. (1986) The normative structure of science: social control in the academic profession, in: Smart, J.C., ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2, Agathon Press, New York: 309-357.
8. Merton, R.K. & Barber, B. (1963) Sociological ambivalence, in: Tiryakian E.A., ed. Sociological Theory, Values and Sociocultural Change, The Free Press, Glencoe: 91-120.
9. Rosenzweig, R.M. (1985) Research as intellectual property: influences within the university, Science. Technology, and Human Values 10(2): 41-48.
10. Mulkay, M. (1976) Norms and ideology in science, Social Science Information 15(4-5): 637-656.
11. Mulkay, M. (1979) Science and the Sociology of Knowledge, George Allen and Unwin, London.
12. Mulkay, M. (1980) Interpretation and the use of rules: the case of the norms of science, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, series 2, 39: 111-125.
13. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
14. Durkheim, E., translated by Fields, K.E. (1995 [1912]). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Free Press, New York.
15. Braxton, J.M. (1999) Toward a guiding framework for self-regulation in the community of the academic profession, in: Braxton. J.M., ed. Perspectives on Scholarly Misconduct in the Sciences, Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio: 139-161.
16. Zuckerman, H.E. (1988) The sociology of science, in: Smelser, N.J., ed. Handbook of Sociology, Sage, Newbury Park, California: 511-574.
17. Louis, K.S., Anderson, M.S. & Rosenberg, L. (1995). Academic misconduct and values: the department's influence. The Review of Higher Education 18(4): 393-422.
18. Swazey, J.P., Anderson, M.S. & Louis, K.S. (1993) Ethical problems in academic research, American Scientist 81: 542-553.
19. Anderson, M.S. (1996) Misconduct and departmental context: evidence from the Acadia Institute's Graduate Education Project, Journal of Information Ethics 5(1): 15-33.
20. Biglan, A. (1973) The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195-203.
21. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Anderson, M.S., Louis, K.S. & Earle, J. (1994) Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct, Journal of Higher Education 65(3), 331-350.
23. Anderson, M.S. (1996). Collaboration, the doctoral experience, and the departmental environment, The Review of Higher Education, 19(3): 305-326.
24. Anderson, M.S. & Swazey, J.P. (1998). Reflections on the graduate student experience: an overview, in: Anderson, M.S., ed. The Experience of Being in Graduate School: An Exploration. New Directions for Higher Education, no. 101, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
25. Victor, B. & Cullen, J.B. (1988) The organizational basis of ethical work climates, Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 101-125.
26. Bryk, A.S. & Raudenbush, S. (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models, Sage, Newbury Park, California.
27. Bryk, A.S., Raudenbush, S. & Congdon, R.T., Jr. (1994) Hierarchical Linear Modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L Programs, Scientific Software International, Chicago.
28. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Anderson, M.S., Causino, N. & Louis, K.S. (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty, Journal of the American Medical Association 277(15): 1224-1228.
29. Pritchard, I. (1993) Integrity versus misconduct: learning the difference between right and wrong, Academic Medicine 68(9, Supplement): S67-S71.
30. Anderson, M.S. (1999) Uncovering the covert: research on academic misconduct, in Braxton, J.M., ed. Perspectives on Scholarly Misconduct in the Sciences, Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio.