Some Other "Uh(m)"s

Discourse Processes

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 130-174

  Schegloff, Emanuel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952827719     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530903223380     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
2. Clift, R. (2001). Meaning in interaction: The case of actually. Language, 77, 245-291.
3. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2001). Interactional prosody: High onsets in reason-for-the-call turns. Language in Society, 30, 29-53.
4. Egbert, M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation analysis: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator bitte. Language in Society, 25, 587-612.
5. Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 185-237). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 2, 181-199.
7. Jefferson, G. (1980). On trouble-premonitory response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 153-185.
8. Kim, K.-H. (2001). Confirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaboration: Organization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 345-372). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9. Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177-201.
10. Lerner, G. H., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference. Discourse Studies, 9, 526-557.
11. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
12. Mazeland, H. (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1816-1869.
13. Oh, S.-Y. (2005). English zero anaphora as an interactional resource. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 267-302.
14. Oh, S.-Y. (2007a). The interactional meaning of quasi-pronouns in Korean conversation. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp. 203-225). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Oh, S.-Y. (2007b). Overt reference to speaker and recipient in Korean. Discourse Studies, 9, 462-492.
16. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnographyof communication (pp. 325-345). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
18. Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone has to lie. In M. Sanches & B. G. Blount (Eds.), Socioculturaldimensions of language use (pp. 57-80). New York: Academic.
19. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54-69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. (Original presented as a public lecture at the Linguistic Society of America, University of Michigan, Summer, 1973)
20. Sacks, H. (1992-1995). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 & 2). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
21. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Eds.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington.
22. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
23. Schegloff, E. A. (1967). The first five seconds: The order of conversational openings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
24. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
25. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (Eds.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
26. Schegloff, E. A. (1979a). Identification and recognition in telephone openings. In G. Psathas (Eds.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23-78). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Schegloff, E. A. (1979b). The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 261-288). New York: Academic.
28. Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: Can I ask you a question. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104-152.
29. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of uh huh and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on languages and linguistics 1981; analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30. Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111-151.
31. Schegloff, E. A. (1988). On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: A single case conjecture. Social Problems, 35, 442-457.
32. Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 139-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of coherence in talk-in- interaction. In B. Dorval (Eds.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1295-1345.
35. Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161-216.
36. Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499-545.
38. Schegloff, E. A. (1998, November). Word repeats as turn ends. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, November, 1998, New York, New York.
39. Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Opening sequencing. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 321-385). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Overwrought utterances: Complex sentences in a different sense. In J. Bybee & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson (pp. 321-336). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
41. Schegloff, E. A. (2004). Answering the phone. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 63-107). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Schegloff, E. A. (2004). On dispensability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 95-149.
43. Schegloff, E. A. (2005, November). Word repeats as unit ends. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston.
44. Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70-96). London: Berg.
45. Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). Conveying who you are: The presentation of self, strictly speaking. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp. 123-148). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Schegloff, E. A. (2009). A practice for (re-)exiting a sequence: And/but/so C uh(m) C silence. In K. Turner & B. Fraser (Eds.), Language in life, and a life in language: Jacob Mey-A festschrift (pp. 365-374). Bingly, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
48. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
49. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
50. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., et al. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10587-10592.
51. Turner, K., & Fraser, B. (Eds.). (2009). Language in life, and a life in language: Jacob Mey-A festschrift. Bingly, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
52. Wu, R.-J. E. (2006). Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes, 41, 67-109.
53. Zimmerman, D. (1984). Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 210-228). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
54. Zimmerman, D. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In J. Heritage & P. Drew (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 418-469). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.