Addressing foundational elements of regional land-use change forecasting

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 233-247

  Sohl, Terry L ^a   Loveland, Thomas R ^a   Sleeter, Benjamin M ^b   Sayler, Kristi L ^a   Barnes, Christopher A ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Change; Foundation; Land; Model; Regional

Indexed keywords

LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; REGIONAL PLANNING; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952745249     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-009-9391-3     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aber J, Neilson RP, McNulty S et al (2001) Forest processes and global environmental change: predicting the effects of individual and multiple stressors. Bioscience 51: 735-751.
2. Brown DG, Goovaerts P, Burnicki A et al (2002) Stochastic simulation of land-cover change using geostatistics and generalized additive models. Photogramm Eng Rem S 68: 1051-1061.
3. Burton DM, McCarl BA, de Sousa CNM et al (1997) Economic impacts of climate change on southern forests. Texas A& M University, College Station.
4. Claggett PR, Jantz CA, Goetz SJ et al (2004) Assessing development pressure in the Chesapeake bay watershed: an evaluation of two land-use change models. Environ Monit Assess 94: 129-146.
5. Conner RC, Hartsell AJ (2002) Forest area and conditions. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. General technical report SRS-53. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, pp 357-402.
6. Couclelis H (2002) Why I no longer work with agents: a challenge for ABMs of human-environment interactions. In: Parker DC, Berger T, Manson SM (eds) Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Report and Review of an International Workshop, Irvine, 4-7 October 2001.
7. Daniels JM (2005) The rise and fall of the Pacific northwest log market. General technical report PNW-GTR-624. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland.
8. Gallant AL, Loveland TR, Sohl TL et al (2004) Using an ecoregion framework to analyze land-cover and land-use dynamics. Environ Manage 34: S89-S110.
9. Geoghegan J, Pritchard L Jr, Ogneva-Himmelberger Y et al (1998) "Socializing the pixel" and "pixelizing the social" in land-use and land-cover change. In: Liverman D, Moran EF, Rindfuss RR, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 51-69.
10. Haynes RW (2003) An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. General technical report PNW-GTR-560. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland.
11. Hertel TW (1997) Global trade analysis: modelling and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Irwin EG, Geoghegan J (2001) Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85: 7-24.
13. Kline JD, Alig RJ (2001) A spatial model of land use change for western Oregon and western Washington. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. Research Paper PNW-RP-528.
14. Lane CL (1998) Log export and import restrictions of the U. S. Pacific northwest and British Columbia: past and present. General technical report PNW-GTR-436. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland.
15. Liang Y, Durrans SR, Lightsey T (2002) A revised version of PnET-II to simulate the hydrologic cycle in southeastern forested areas. J Am Water Resour Assess 38: 79-89.
16. Loveland TR, Sohl TL, Stehman SV et al (2002) A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land-cover changes. Photogramm Eng Rem S 68: 1091-1099.
17. Loveland TR, Gutman G, Buford M et al (2003) Chapter 6: land use/land cover change. In: Strategic plan for the climate change science program. U. S. Climate Change Science Program, Washington, pp 118-134.
18. Marcucci DJ (2000) Landscape history as a planning tool. Landsc Urban Plan 49: 67-81.
19. Matthews R, Gilbert N, Roach A et al (2007) Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications. Landscape Ecol 22: 1447-1459.
20. McCarl BA, Adams DM, Alig RJ et al (2000) Effects of global climate change on the U. S. forest sector: response functions derived from a dynamic resource and market simulator. Clim Res 15: 195-205.
21. McNulty SG, Aber JD (2001) U. S. national climate change assessment on forest ecosystems: an introduction. BioScience 51: 720-722.
22. McNulty SG, Vose JM, Swank WT (1996) Potential climate change effects on loblolly pine forest productivity and drainage across the southern United States. Ambio 25: 449-453.
23. Naveh Z (2001) Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 57: 269-284.
24. Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77: 118-125.
25. Parker DC, Berger T, Manson SM (eds) (2002) Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Report and review of an international workshop, Irvine.
26. Parker DC, Manson SM, Janssen MA et al (2004) Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93: 314-337.
27. Pontius RG, Spencer J (2005) Uncertainty in extrapolations of predictive land-change models. Environ Plan B Plan Des 32: 211-230.
28. Pontius RG, Boersma W, Castella J, Clarke K, de Nijs T, Dietzel C, Duan Z, Fotsing E, Goldstein N, Kok K, Koomen E, Lippitt CD, McConnell W, Sood AM, Pijanowski B, Pithadia S, Sweeney S, Trung TN, Veldkamp AT, Verburg PH (2008) Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann Reg Sci 42: 11-37.
29. Poudevigne I, Baudry J (2003) The implication of past and present landscape patterns for biodiversity research: introduction and overview. Landscape Ecol 18: 223-225.
30. Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Turner BL II et al (2004) Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 976-981.
31. Sohl TL, Sayler KL (2008) Using the FORE-SCE model to project land-cover change in the southeastern United States. Ecol Model 219: 49-65.
32. Sohl TL, Gallant AL, Loveland TR (2004) The characteristics and interpretability of land surface change and implications for project design. Photogramm Eng Rem S 70: 439-448.
33. Sohl TL, Sayler KL, Drummond MA et al (2007) The FORE-SCE model: a practical approach for projecting land use change using scenario-based modeling. J Land Use Sci 2: 102-126.
34. Spies TA, Ripple WJ, Bradshaw GA (1994) Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecol Appl 4: 555-568.
35. Strengers B, Leemans R, Eickhout B et al (2004) The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2. 2 model. GeoJ 61: 381-393.
36. Tomlin CD (1990) Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
37. Trani MK (2002) Terrestrial ecosystems. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. General technical report SRS-53. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville.
38. Turner MG, Wear DN, Flamm RO (1996) Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecol Appl 6: 1150-1172.
39. Verburg PH (2006) Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models. Landscape Ecol 21: 1171-1183.
40. Verburg PH, Veldkamp A (2004) Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecol 19: 77-98.
41. Verburg PH, Schot P, Dijst M et al (2004) Land use change modeling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJ 61: 309-324.
42. Verburg PH, Eickhout B, van Meijl H (2008) A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. Ann Reg Sci 42: 57-77.
43. Wallin DO, Swanson FJ, Marks B (1994) Landscape pattern response to changes in pattern generation rules: land-use legacies in forestry. Ecol Appl 4: 569-580.
44. Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) (2002) Southern forest resource assessment. General technical report SRS-53. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville.
45. Wear DN, Liu R, Foreman JM et al (1999) The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia. For Ecol Manag 118: 107-115.
46. Wimberly MC, Ohmann JL (2004) A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) coast range. Landscape Ecol 19: 631-646.
47. Wu X, Hu Y, He HS et al (2008) Performance evaluation of the SLEUTH model in the Shenyang metropolitan area of northeastern China. Environ Model Assess 13: 1-10.
48. Zampella RA, Procopio NA, Lathrop RG et al (2007) Relationship of land-use/land-cover patterns and surface-water quality in the Mullica river basin. J Am Water Resour Assess 43: 594-604.
49. Zhang Y, Zhang D, Schelhas J (2005) Small-scale non-industrial private forest ownership in the United States: rationale and implications for forest management. Silva Fenn 39: 443-454.