Dynamic effects of oviposition site on offspring sexually-selected traits and scaling relationships

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 375-390

  Miller, Christine W ^a   Emlen, Douglas J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Environmental heterogeneity; Maternal effects; Scaling; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BEETLE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE EXPRESSION; HETEROGENEITY; HOST PLANT; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; MATERNAL CARE; MATERNAL EFFECT; OVIPOSITION; PLUMAGE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION;

COREIDAE; HELICONIA; HEMIPTERA;

EID: 77952743987     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-009-9312-6     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804-816.
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47: 817-844.
4. Bonduriansky R (2007) The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 169: 9-19.
5. Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2005) Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae). Evolution 59: 138-151.
6. Charmantier A, Garant D (2005) Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 272: 1415-1425.
7. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004a) Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58: 1038-1046.
8. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004b) Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc R Soc Lond B 271: 771-783.
9. Croat T (1978) Flora of Barro Colorado Island. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
10. David JR, Moreteau B, Gauthier JP, Petavy G, Stockel A, Imasheva AG (1994) Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale lines analysis. Genet Sel Evol 26: 229-251.
11. David P, Bjorksten T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2000) Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406: 186-188.
12. Emlen DJ (1997) Diet alters male horn allometry in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 567-574.
13. Emlen DJ, Allen CE (2003) Genotype to phenotype: physiological control of trait size and scaling in insects. Integr Comp Biol 43: 617-634.
14. Emlen DJ, Nijhout HF (2000) The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 45: 661-708.
15. Emlen DJ, Hunt J, Simmons LW (2005) Evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary lability, and constraint. Am Nat 166: S42-S68.
16. Fujisaki K (1981) Studies on the mating system of the winter cherry bug, Acanthocoris sordidus Thunberg (Heteroptera, Coreidae): II. Harem defense polygyny. Res Popul Ecol 23: 262-279.
17. Godfray HCJ (1995) Evolutionary theory of parent-offspring conflict. Nature 376: 133-138.
18. Green AJ (2000) The scaling and selection of sexually dimorphic characters: an example using the Marbled Teal. J Avian Biol 31: 345-350.
19. Greenfield MD, Rodriguez RL (2004) Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim Behav 68: 1461-1468.
20. Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the expression of sexually selected traits: neglected components of variation. Anim Behav 61: 987-993.
21. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999) Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400: 358-360.
22. Hughes M (1996) Size assessment via a visual signal in snapping shrimp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38: 51-57.
23. Jaenike J (1978) On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects. Theor Popul Biol 14: 350-356.
24. Jensen H, Svorkmo-Lundberg T, Ringsby TH, Sæther BE (2006) Environmental influence and cohort effects in a sexual ornament in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Oikos 114: 212-224.
25. Karan D, Morin JP, Gilbert P, Moreteau B, Scheiner SM, David JR (2000) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. IX. Genetic architecture, temperature, and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 54: 1035-1040.
26. Kelly CD (2005) Allometry and sexual selection of male weaponry in Wellington tree weta, Hemideina crassidens (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). Behav Ecol 16: 145-152.
27. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising-the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124: 309-323.
28. Kokko H, Heubel K (2008) Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox. Genetica 132: 209-216.
29. Lande R, Kirkpatrick M (1990) Selection response in traits with maternal inheritance. Genet Res 55: 189-197.
30. Marshall D, Uller T (2007) When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116: 1957-1963.
31. Mayhew PJ (1997) Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79: 417-428.
32. Mayhew PJ (2001) Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 165-167.
33. Miller CW (2007) Maternal effects and sexual selection in the heliconia bug, Leptoscelis tricolor (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Dissertation, Division of Biological Sciences, Ph. D. University of Montana, Missoula.
34. Miller CW (2008) Seasonal effects on offspring reproductive traits through maternal oviposition behavior. Behav Ecol 4: 482-485.
35. Miller CW, Moore AJ (2007) A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 274: 1279-1286.
36. Mitchell PL (1980) Combat and territorial defense of Acanthocephala femorata (Hemiptera, Coreidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 73: 404-408.
37. Miyatake T (1993) Male-male aggressive-behavior is changed by body-size difference in the leaf-footed plant bug, Leptoglossus australis, Fabricius (Heteroptera, Coreidae). J Ethol 11: 63-65.
38. Moczek AP, Emlen DJ (1999) Proximate determination of male horn dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J Evol Biol 12: 27-37.
39. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 403.
40. Nageon de Lestang F (2010) Effects of environmental heterogeneity on male-male competitive success, size, and scaling in a cactus bug Narnia femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae). University of Florida, Journal of Undergraduate Research, C. W. Miller, Mentor (in review).
41. Nur N, Hasson O (1984) Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. J Theor Biol 110: 275-297.
42. Nylin S, Janz N (1996) Host plant preferences in the comma butterfly (Polygonia c-album): do parents and offspring agree? Ecoscience 3: 285-289.
43. Post E, Langvatn R, Forchhammer MC, Stenseth NC (1999) Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 4467-4471.
44. Qvarnström A (1999) Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53: 1564-1572.
45. Qvarnström A (2001) Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 5-7.
46. Qvarnström A, Price TD (2001) Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 95-100.
47. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York.
48. Rossiter M (1998) The role of environmental variation in parental effects expression. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 112-134.
49. Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1415-1421.
50. Scheirs J, De Bruyn L, Verhagen R (2000) Optimization of adult performance determines host choice in a grass miner. Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 2065-2069.
51. Shingleton AW, Frankino WA, Flatt T, Nijhout HF, Emlen DJ (2007) Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. Bioessays 29: 536-548.
52. Stiles FG (1975) Ecology, flowering phenology, and hummingbird pollination of some Costa Rican heliconia species. Ecology 56: 285-301.
53. Sutherland ORW (1969) The role of the host plant in the production of winged forms by two strains of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. J Insect Physiol 15: 2179-2201.
54. Teder T, Tammaru T (2005) Sexual size dimorphism within species increases with body size in insects. Oikos 108: 321-334.
55. Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47: 3-14.
56. Weladji R, Holand O, Steinheim G, Colman JE, Gjostein H, Kosmo A (2005) Sexual dimorphism and intercohort variation in reindeer calf antler length is associated with density and weather. Oecologia 145: 549-555.