-
1
-
-
0000791830
-
What Is equality? part ii: Equality of resources
-
For an influential early statement of this view. Fall
-
For an influential early statement of this view, see Ronald Dworkin, "What Is Equality? Part II: Equality of Resources," Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, no.1 (Fall 1981): 283-345.
-
(1981)
Philosophy and Public Affairs
, vol.10
, Issue.1
, pp. 283-345
-
-
Dworkin, R.1
-
2
-
-
84935413249
-
On the currency of egalitarian justice
-
For important discussion. July
-
For important discussion, see Gerald Cohen, "On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice," Ethics 99, no.4 (July 1989): 906-44;
-
(1989)
Ethics
, vol.99
, Issue.4
, pp. 906-944
-
-
Cohen, G.1
-
3
-
-
0002431297
-
Equality and equal opportunity for welfare
-
and the influential series of papers by Richard Arneson that includes
-
and the influential series of papers by Richard Arneson that includes "Equality and Equal Opportunity forWelfare," Philosophical Studies 56 (1989): 77-93;
-
(1989)
Philosophical Studies
, vol.56
, pp. 77-93
-
-
-
4
-
-
0000357472
-
-
Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare
-
"Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare," Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 159-94;
-
(1990)
Philosophy and Public Affairs
, vol.19
, pp. 159-94
-
-
-
5
-
-
0042046196
-
Luck egalitarianism and the undeserving poor
-
"Luck Egalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor," The Journal of Political Philosophy 5, no.4 (1997): 327-50;
-
(1997)
The Journal of Political Philosophy
, vol.5
, Issue.4
, pp. 327-350
-
-
-
6
-
-
65449177000
-
Luck egalitarianism interpreted and defended
-
Spring and Fall
-
and "Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended," Philosophical Topics 32, nos. 1 and 2 (Spring and Fall 2004): 1-20.
-
(2004)
Philosophical Topics
, vol.1-2
, pp. 1-20
-
-
-
7
-
-
0032647108
-
What is the point of equality?
-
For an influential critical discussion (in which the name "luck egalitarianism" was first introduced). January
-
For an influential critical discussion (in which the name "luck egalitarianism" was first introduced), see Elizabeth Anderson, "What Is the Point of Equality?" Ethics 109, no.2 (January 1999): 287-337.
-
(1999)
Ethics
, vol.109
, Issue.2
, pp. 287-337
-
-
Anderson, E.1
-
8
-
-
0011331449
-
-
For an excellent book-length treatment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
-
For an excellent book-length treatment, see Susan Hurley, Justice, Luck, and Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).
-
(2003)
Justice, Luck, and Knowledge
-
-
Hurley, S.1
-
10
-
-
77952607450
-
-
The existence of such an option is, of course, only a necessary condition for the resulting inequality's justice. For interesting discussion of some of what would have to be added to arrive at a sufficient condition, see the papers by Arneson that are cited in note 1
-
The existence of such an option is, of course, only a necessary condition for the resulting inequality's justice. For interesting discussion of some of what would have to be added to arrive at a sufficient condition, see the papers by Arneson that are cited in note 1.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
77952621674
-
-
I discuss a variety of cases of this sort, and their implications concerning the epistemic condition for responsibility inmy book Who Knew? Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
I discuss a variety of cases of this sort, and their implications concerning the epistemic condition for responsibility, inmy book Who Knew? ResponsibilityWithout Awareness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
-
(2009)
Responsibility Without Awareness
-
-
-
12
-
-
77952662774
-
-
Richard Arneson notices the difference between these two versions of luck egalitarianism in his essay "Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended." However, Arneson does not discuss the full range of cases (or, in my opinion, the most important class of cases) about which the two versions disagree
-
Richard Arneson notices the difference between these two versions of luck egalitarianism in his essay "Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended." However, Arneson does not discuss the full range of cases (or, in my opinion, the most important class of cases) about which the two versions disagree.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
0009035581
-
Culpable ignorance
-
October
-
See Holly Smith, "Culpable Ignorance," The Philosophical Review 92, no.4 (October 1983): 543-571
-
(1983)
The Philosophical Review
, vol.92
, Issue.4
, pp. 543-571
-
-
Smith, H.1
-
14
-
-
33644754156
-
Out of control
-
January
-
George Sher, "Out of Control," Ethics 116, no.2 (January 2006): 285-301.
-
(2006)
Ethics
, vol.116
, Issue.2
, pp. 285-301
-
-
Sher, G.1
-
15
-
-
42949085205
-
Restoring control: Comments on george sher
-
For cogent criticism. June
-
For cogent criticism, see Neil Levy, "Restoring Control: Comments on George Sher," Philosophia 36, no.2 (June 2008): 213-221
-
(2008)
Philosophia
, vol.36
, Issue.2
, pp. 213-221
-
-
Levy, N.1
-
17
-
-
0004051088
-
-
I introduce this term in Who Knew? For some representative discussions that assert or presuppose the searchlight view. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
-
I introduce this term in Who Knew? For some representative discussions that assert or presuppose the searchlight view, see Barbara Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 99-101;
-
(1993)
The Practice of Moral Judgment
, pp. 99-101
-
-
Herman, B.1
-
19
-
-
0000135084
-
Moral responsibility and ignorance
-
April. esp. pp. 418 and 421
-
Michael J. Zimmerman, "Moral Responsibility and Ignorance," Ethics 107 (April 1997): 410-26, esp. pp. 418 and 421;
-
(1997)
Ethics
, vol.107
, pp. 410-426
-
-
Zimmerman, M.J.1
-
20
-
-
45849083785
-
Cultural membership and moral responsibility
-
and Neil Levy, "Cultural Membership and Moral Responsibility," The Monist 86 (2003): 5.
-
(2003)
The Monist
, vol.86
, pp. 5
-
-
Levy, N.1
-
21
-
-
77952668042
-
-
For further examples. chap. 2.
-
For further examples, see Sher, Who Knew?, chap. 2.
-
Sher Who Knew?
-
-
-
22
-
-
77952668042
-
-
For discussion of some possible ways of defending the searchlight view. chaps. 3 and 4
-
For discussion of some possible ways of defending the searchlight view, see Sher, Who Knew?, chaps. 3 and 4.
-
Sher. Who Knew?
-
-
-
24
-
-
77952633908
-
Egalitarianism and the undeserving poor
-
Arneson said this in the version of. that he delivered at the but the quotation does not appear in the published version of that paper
-
Arneson said this in the version of "Egalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor" that he delivered at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, but the quotation does not appear in the published version of that paper.
-
1996 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
-
-
-
25
-
-
0033458404
-
Equal Opportunity forwelfare defended and recanted
-
RichardArneson, "Equal Opportunity forWelfare Defended and Recanted," The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no.4 (1999): 489.
-
(1999)
The Journal of Political Philosophy
, vol.7
, Issue.4
, pp. 489
-
-
Arneson, R.1
-
32
-
-
34347299687
-
Defending luck egalitarianism
-
Nicholas Barry, "Defending Luck Egalitarianism," Journal of Applied Philosophy 23, no.1 (2006): 102.
-
(2006)
Journal of Applied Philosophy
, vol.23
, Issue.1
, pp. 102
-
-
Barry, N.1
|