Defending luck egalitarianism

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 89-107

  Barry, Nicholas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347299687     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00322.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. E. S. Anderson, ‘What is the point of equality?’, Ethics, 109, 2 (1999): 287–337.
2. S. Scheffler, ‘What is egalitarianism?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31, 1 (2003): 5–39.
3. A. Stark, ‘Beyond choice: rethinking the post-Rawlsian debate over egalitarian justice’, Political Theory, 30, 1 (2002): 36–67
4. R. Dworkin, ‘Sovereign Virtue revisited’, Ethics, 113, 1 (2002) 106–143
5. A. Phillips, ‘Defending equality of outcome’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12, 1 (2004): 1–19
6. G. A. Cohen, ‘On the currency of egalitarian justice’, Ethics, 99, 4 (1989): 933
7. I. M. Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).
8. T. M. Scanlon ‘Equality of resources and equality of welfare: a forced marriage?’, Ethics, 97, 1 (1986): 116–17
9. R. J. Arneson ‘Equality and equal opportunity for welfare’, Philosophical Studies, 56, 1 (1989): 77–93 at pp. 81–1, 84–5
10. A. T. Coram, ‘Why social scientists should be interested in luck: a note on some fallacies’, Social Science Quarterly, 79, 1 (1998): 130.
11. A. T. Coram, ‘Social class and luck: some lessons from gambler’s ruin and branching processes, Political Studies, 45 (1997): 66.
12. M. Clayton, and A. Williams, ‘Egalitarian justice and interpersonal comparison’, European Journal of Political Research, 35, 4 (1999): 446–7.
13. R. Goodin, Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), pp. 46–50.
14. B. Williams, ‘The idea of equality’ in P. Laslett, and W. G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962)
15. J. Baker, ‘An egalitarian case for basic income’ in P. van Parijs (ed.) Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform (London and New York: Verso, 1992), p. 102
16. J. Wolff, ‘Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, 2 (1998): 97–122.
17. P. van Parijs, ‘Competing justifications of basic income’ in P. van Parijs (ed.) Arguing For Basic Income: Ethical Foundations For A Radical Reform (London and New York: Verso, 1992), pp. 9–14.
18. T. Hinton, ‘Must egalitarians choose between fairness and respect?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30, 1 (2001) especially p. 81
19. R. Crisp, ‘Equality, priority, and compassion’, Ethics, 113, 4 (2003) especially pp. 757–763.