A test of engagement versus disengagement in catastrophe models

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 361-371

  Beattie, S ^a   Davies, M ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANXIETY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOOTBALL; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REINFORCEMENT; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ANXIETY; AROUSAL; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOOTBALL; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; JUDGMENT; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTIVATION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF EFFICACY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952603486     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712609X467891     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. New York: Freeman.
2. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017-1028.
3. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. (1989). The intensity of motivation. In M. R. Rozenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp.109-131). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
4. Caraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 417-427.
5. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chase, M. A. (2001). Children's self-efficacy, motivation intentions, and attributions in physical education and sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 47-54.
7. Escarti, A., & Guzman, J. F. (1999). Effects of feedback on self-efficacy, performance, and choice on an athletic task. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 83-96.
8. Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409-434.
9. Ford, C. E., & Brehm, J. W. (1987). Effort expenditure following failure. In C. R. Snyder & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Coping with negative life events: Clinical and social psychological perspectives (pp.51-79). New York: Plenum.
10. Guastello, S. J. (1987). A butterfly catastrophe model of motivation in organizations: Academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 161-182.
11. Guastello, S. J. (1992). Clash of the paradigms: A critique of an examination of the polynomial regression technique for evaluating catastrophe theory hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 111,375-379.
12. Hamilton, P., Hockey, G. R. J., & Rejman, M. (1977). The place of the concept of activation in human information processing theory: An integrated approach. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VI, pp.463-486). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Hardy, L. (1990). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. In J. G. Jones & L. Hardy (Eds.), Stress and performance in sport (pp.81-106). Chichester: Wiley.
14. Hardy, L. (1996). A test of catastrophe models of anxiety and sports performance against multidimensional theory models using the method of dynamic differences. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 9, 69-86.
15. Hardy, L. (1999). Stress anxiety and performance. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2, 227-233.
16. Hardy, L., Beattie, S., & Woodman, T. (2007). Anxiety-induced performance catastrophes: Investigating effort required as an asymmetry factor. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 15-31.
17. Hardy, L., & Parfitt, C. G. (1991). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 163-178.
18. Hardy, L., Parfitt, C. G., & Pates, J. (1994). Performance catastrophes in sport: A test of the hysteresis hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12, 327-334.
19. Hardy, L., Woodman, T., & Carrington, S. (2004). Is self-confidence a bias factor in higher-order catastrophe models? An exploratory analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Sciences, 26, 359-368.
20. Hollenbeck, J. R., & Williams, C. R. (1987). Goal importance, self-focus, and the goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 204-211.
21. King, L. A., Richards, J. H., & Stemmerich, E. (1998). Daily goals, life goals, and worst fears: Means, ends, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 66, 713-744.
22. Kukla, A. (1972). Foundations of an attributional theory of performance. Psychological Review, 79,454-470.
23. Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 364-369.
24. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241-251.
25. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burton (Eds.), Competitive anxiety in sport (pp.117-190). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
27. Orbell, S., Johnston, M., Rowley, D., Davey, P., & Espley, A. (2001). Self-efficacy and goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in people following hospitalization: A prospective study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 25-40.
28. Peake, P. K., & Cervone, D. (1989). Sequence anchoring and self-efficacy: Primacy effects in the consideration of possibilities. Social Cognition, 7, 31-50.
29. Seijts, G. H., Meertens, R. M., & Kok, G. (1997). The effects of task importance and publicness on the relation between goal difficulty and performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 54-62.
30. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546-557.
31. Strahan, E. Y., & Conger, A. J. (1999). Social anxiety and social performance: Why don't we see more catastrophes? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 399-416.
32. Thom, R. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis. (D. H. Fowler trans.), New York: Benjamin.
33. Vancouver, J. B., More, K. M., & Yoder, R. J. (2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 35-47.
34. Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1-12.
35. Waung, M., MacNeil, M., & Vance, R. J. (1995). Reactions to feedback in goal choice and goal change process. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1360-1390.
36. Wright, R. A. (1996). Brehm's theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behaviour (pp.424-453). New York: Guilford Press.
37. Wright, R. A. (2008). Refining the prediction of effort: Brehm's distinction between potential motivation and motivation intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 682-701.
38. Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Chavez, C. (1999). Task importance, feasibility, and agent influence behaviour as determinants of target commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 137-143.
39. Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Falbe, C. M. (1996). Antecedents of influential outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 309-317.