Fabrication and characterization of electrospun poly-DL-lactide (PDLLA) fibrous coatings on 45S5 Bioglass® substrates for bone tissue engineering applications

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 768-774

  Yunos, D M ^a   Ahmad, Z ^b   Boccaccinia, A R ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioactive glass substrates; Bioactivity studies; Electrospinning; Light interferometry; PDLLA fibres; SBF; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

APPLIED VOLTAGES; BIO-GLASS; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CELL ATTACHMENTS; DL-LACTIDE; ELECTROSPUNS; FIBROUS STRUCTURES; FIXED FLOW; LIGHT INTERFEROMETRY; PDLLA FIBRES; SBF; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY IMAGE; SIMULATED BODY FLUIDS; SINTERED PELLETS; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; WHITE-LIGHT INTERFEROMETRY; WORK FOCUS;

APPLICATIONS; BONE; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROSPINNING; FIBERS; HYDROXYAPATITE; INTERFEROMETRY; PELLETIZING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SINTERING; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOACTIVE GLASS;

CARBONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DIMETHYLCARBONIC ACID; NANOCRYSTAL; POLYLACTIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BODY FLUID; BONE TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROSPINNING; FLOW RATE; INTERFEROMETRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WHITE LIGHT;

EID: 77952580560     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2283     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Williams D, Benefit and risk in tissue engineering.Mater Today 7:24-29 (2004).
2. Vacanti J Pand Vacanti CA,The history and scope of tissue engineering. In Principle of Tissue Engineering, 2nd edn, ed by Lanza RP, Langer R and Vancanti JP. Acedemic Press, California, pp 3-9 (2000).
3. Hedberga EL, Shiha CK, Lemoinea JJ, Timmera MD, Liebschnera MAK, and Jansenb JA, et al, In vitro degradation of porous poly(propylene fumarate)/poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) composite scaffolds, Biomaterials 26:3215-3225 (2005).
4. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker J and Boccaccini AR, Review: biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:3413-3431 (2006).
5. Thomson RC, Shung AK, Yaszemski MJ and Mikos AG, Polymer scaffold processing. In Principle of Tissue Engineering, 2nd edn, ed by Lanza RP, Langer R and Vancanti JP. Academic Press, California, pp 251-261 (2000).
6. Wintermantel E, Mayer J, Blum J, Eckert KL, Luscher P and Mathey M, Tissue engineering scaffolds using superstructures. Biomaterials 17:83-91 (1996).
7. Resing A, Yao C, Storey D and Webster TJ, Greater osteoblast longterm functions on ionic plasma deposited nanostructured orthopaedic implantcoatings. J Biomed Mater Res 87A:78-83(2008).
8. Levy S, Dalen M, Agonafer S and Soboyejo WO, Cell/surface interactions and adhesion on bioactive glass 45S5. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 18:89-102 (2007).
9. Engel E, et al, Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: the materials side. Trends Biotechnol 26:39-47 (2008).
10. Habraken WJM, Wolke JGC and Jansen JA, Ceramic composites as matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Deliv Rev 59:234-248 (2007).
11. Roether JA, Boccaccini AR, Hench LL, Maquet V, Gautier S and Jerome R, Development and in vitro characterisation of novel bioresorbable and bioactive composite materials based on polylactide foamsandBioglass® for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:3871-3878 (2002).
12. Agrawal CM and Ray RB, Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 55:141-150 (2001).
13. Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GC and Agrawal CC, Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility, and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer. Biomaterials 17:93-102 (1996).
14. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL and Nealey PF, Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Biomaterials 20:573-588 (1999).
15. Green AM, Jansen JA, Van der Waerden JPCM and Von Recum AF, Fibroblast response to microtextured silicon surfaces: texture orientation intoorout of the surface. J Biomed Mater Res 28:647-653 (1994).
16. Von Recum AF, Shannon CE, Cannon CE, Long KJ and Van Kooten TG, Surface roughness, porosity and texture as modifiers of cellular adhesion. Tissue Eng 2:241-253 (1996).
17. Thian ES, Ahmad Z, Huang J, Edirisinghe MJ, Jayasinghe SN, Ireland DC, et al, The role of electrosprayed apatite nanocrystals in guiding osteoblast behaviour. Biomaterials 29:1833-1843 (2008).
18. Khan AS, Ahmed Z, Edirisinghe MJ, Wong FS and Rehman IU, Preparation and characterization of a novel bioactive restorative composite based on covalently coupled polyurethane-nanohydroxyapatite fibres. Acta Biomater 4:1275-1287 (2008).
19. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE, Yong T, Ma Z and Ramaseshan R, Electrospun nanofibres: solving global issues.Mater Today 9:40-50 (2006).
20. Sill TJ and Von Recum HA, Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:1989-2006 (2008).
21. Martins A, Reis RL and Neves NM, Electrospinning: processing technique for tissue engineering scaffolding. Int Mater Rev 53:257-274 (2008).
22. Formhals A, US Patent 1975504 (1934).
23. Reneker DH and Chun I, Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 7:216-223 (1996).
24. Fong H, Chun I and Reneker DH, Beaded nanofibres formed during electrospinning. Polymer 40:4585-4592 (1990).
25. Jaeger R, Bergshoef MM, Battlle CM, Schonherr H and Vancso GJ, Electrospinning of ultra-thin polymer fibres. Macromol Symp 127:141-150 (1998).
26. Gupta A, Seifalian AM, Ahmad Z, Edirisinghe MJ and Winslett MC, Novel electrohydrodynamic printing of nanocomposite biopolymer scaffolds. J Bioactive Compat Polym 22:265-280 (2007).
27. Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki Mand Ramakrishna S, Compos Sci Technol 63:2223-2253 (2003).
28. Engel E, Valle SD, Aparicio C, Altankov G, Asin L, and Planell JA, et al, Discerning the role of topography and ion exchange in cell response of bioactive tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng: Part A 14:1341-1349 (2008).
29. Hench LL, Bioactive materials: the potential for tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res 41:511-518 (1998).
30. Chen QZ, Thompson I and Boccaccini AR, 45S5 Bioglass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:2414-2425 (2006).
31. Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LDK, Hench LL and Polak JM, Gene expression profiling of human oesteoblast following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass* 45S5 dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res 55:151-157 (2001).
32. Zygo Corporation (www.zygo.com). MetroPro Reference Guide. Middlefield, Connecticut (2004).
33. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T and Yamamuro T, Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J Biomed Mater Res 24:721-734 (1990).
34. Pham QP, Sharma U and Mikos AG, Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibres for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng 12:1197-1211 (2006).
35. Kumbar SG, James R, Nukavarapu SP and Laurencin CT, Electrospun nanofiber scaffolds: engineering soft tissue. Biomed Mater 3:034002 (2008).
36. Li WJ, Cooper Jr. JA, Mauck RL and Tuan RS, Fabrication and characterization of six electrospun poly(α-hydroxy ester)-based fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2:377-385 (2006).
37. Badami AS, Kreke MR, Thompson MS, Riffle JS and Goldstein AS, Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid) substrates. Biomaterials 27:596-606 (2006).
38. Schoen FJ, Tissues In Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, ed by Ratner BD,Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ and Lemons JE, Academic Press, San Diego (1996).
39. Itala A, Ylanen HO, Yrjans J, Heino T, Hentunen T, and Hupa M, et al, Characterization of microrough bioactive glass surface: surface reactions and osteoblast responses in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 62:404-411 (2002).