Students' perceptions of the value of the elements of an online learning environment: Looking back in moving forward

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 135-151

  Palmer, Stuart ^a   Holt, Dale ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

E learning portfolio; Learning experience; Online learning environment; Satisfaction; Student evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952578929     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09539960802364592     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aigbedo, H., & Parameswaran, R. (2004). Importance-performance analysis for improving quality of campus food service. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 21, 876-896.
2. Australasian Council on Open Distance and E-learning (2007). ACODE benchmarks. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://www.acode.edu.au/projects_resources.php#benchmark.
3. Browne, T., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2006). A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14, 177-192.
4. Challis, D. (2005). Eroding distinctiveness: Blurring the boundaries between on- and off-ampus students by the adoption of learning management systems. Paper presented at the 17th Biennial Conference of the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, Adelaide.
5. Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education. New York: Routledge.
6. Contreras-Castillo, J., Perez-Fragoso, C., & Favela, J. (2006). Assessing the use of instant messaging in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 14, 205-218.
7. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R.L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821-836.
8. Deakin University (2005). Attributes of a Deakin graduate-Operational policy. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from http://theguide.deakin.edu.au/TheDeakinGuide.nsf/7264c32fe71924374a2566f3000a65de/e93c3e464659f296ca256e5f000e814e.
9. Deakin University (2007). 2007 pocket statistics. Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/planning-unit/pocket-stats/pocket-stats-2007.xls.
10. Deakin University (2008). Online technologies in courses and units-Procedure. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from http://theguide.deakin.edu.au/TheDeakinGuide.nsf/e1d4531a98f1364aca256e44001a0613/d675c4939d755566ca2573b00000a7dd.
11. Gibbs, D., & Gosper, M. (2006). The upside-down-world of e-learning. Journal of Learning Design, 1, 46-54.
12. Grob, H.L., Bensberg, F., & Dewanto, B.L. (2004). Developing, deploying, using and evaluating an open source learning management system. Paper presented at the 26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces. Cavtat/Dubrovnik, Croatia.
13. Holt, D.M., & Palmer, S. (2007). Staff exercising 'choice'; Students exercising 'choice': Wholly online learning at an Australian university. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Singapore.
14. Holt, D.M., & Thompson, D.J. (1995). Responding to the technological imperative: The experience of one open and distance education institution. Distance Education: An International Journal, 16, 43-64.
15. James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The Australian Universities Teaching Committee.
16. Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218.
17. Niland, J. (1999). The CEQ and accountability: A system-wide perspective and the UNSW Approach. In T. Hand & K. Trembath (Eds.), The course experience questionnaire symposium 1998 (pp. 5-15). Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
18. Oliver, R. (2003). Exploring benchmarks and standards for assuring quality online teaching and learning in higher education. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://www.odlaa.org/publications/2003Proceedings/pdfs/oliver.pdf.
19. Scott, G. (2006). Accessing the student voice-Using CEQuery to identify what retains students and promotes engagement in productive learning in Australian higher education. Barton, Australian Capital Territory: Department of Education, Science and Training.
20. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: A review of UK literature and practice. York: The Higher Education Academy.
21. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477-501.