The impact of aggressive individuals on team training

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 88-94

  Bowler, Mark C ^a   Woehr, David J ^b   Rentsch, Joan R ^b   Bowler, Jennifer L ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggression; Schema; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952552358     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson C.A., Bushman B.J. External validity of 'trivial' experiments: The case for laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology 1997, 1:19-41.
2. Arthur W., Day E.A., Bennett W., McNelly T.L., Jordan J.A. Dyadic versus individual training protocols: Loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:783-791.
3. Arthur W., Young B., Jordan J.A., Shebilske W.L. Effectiveness of individual and dyadic training protocols: The influence of trainee interaction anxiety. Human Factors 1996, 38:79-86.
4. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:261-272.
5. Bjorkqvist K. Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles 1994, 30:177-188.
6. Goldstein I.L., Ford J.K. Training in organizations 2002, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 4th ed.
7. Hackman J.R. The design of work teams. Handbook of organizational behavior 1987, 315-342. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. J.W. Lorsch (Ed.).
8. Howell W.C., Cooke N.J. Training the human information processor: A review of cognitive methods. Training and development in organizations 1989, 121-182. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. I.L. Goldstein (Ed.).
9. James L.R., McIntyre M.D. Conditional reasoning test of aggression: Test manual 2000, Innovative Assessment Technology, Knoxville, TN.
10. James L.R., McIntyre M.D., Glisson C.A., Green P.D., Patton T.W., LeBreton J.M., et al. A conditional reasoning measure of aggression. Organizational Research Methods 2005, 8:69-99.
11. James L.R., Mulaik S.A., Brett J.M. A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods 2006, 9:233-244.
12. Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?. Journal of Management 1994, 20:403-437.
13. LeBreton J.M., Senter J.L. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods 2008, 11:815-852.
14. Maarten S.J., Chipman S.F., Shalin V.L. Cognitive task analysis 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ.
15. Mathieu J.E., Heffner T.S., Goodwin G.F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J.A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000, 85:273-283.
16. Rentsch J.R. Organizational measurement series: Vol. 1. Organizational attitudes, team evaluation, and team assessment 1998, Organizational Research Group, Knoxville, Tennessee.
17. Rentsch J.R., Hall R.J. Members of great teams think alike: A model of the effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. Advances of the Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams 1994, 1:223-261.
18. Rentsch J.R., Klimoski R.J. Why do 'great minds' think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2001, 22:107-120.
19. Rentsch J.R., Woehr D.J. Quantifying congruence in cognition: Social relations modeling and team member schema similarity. Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. E. Salas, S. Fiore (Eds.).
20. Salas E., DiazGranados D., Klein C., Burke C.S., Stagl K.C., Goodwin G.F., et al. Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors 2008, 50:903-933.
21. Shebilske W.L., Regian J.W., Arthur W., Jordan J.A. A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. Human Factors 1992, 34:369-374.
22. Sulsky L.M., Balzer W.K. Meaning and measurement of performance rating accuracy: Some methodological and theoretical concerns. Journal of Applied Psychology 1988, 73(3):497-506.
23. Volition Freespace 2 [computer software] 1999, Interplay Entertainment, Irvine, CA.