Academic library data from the united states: An examination of trends

Libres

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 1-21

  Budd, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952539142     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10586768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abbott, A. (2008). The traditional future: A computational theory of library research. College & Research Libraries, 69, 524-45.
2. Academic Libraries Survey (ALS). (1998-2000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
3. Academic Library Survey (ALS), (2004-2006-2008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
4. Banks J. and Pracht C. (2008). Reference desk staffing trends: A survey. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48, 54-59.
5. Beaubien, A.K., Kuehn, J., Smolow, B., and Ward, S.M. (2006). Challenges facing high-volume interlibrary loan operations: Baseline data and trends in the CIC Consortium. College & Research Libraries, 67, 63-84.
6. Bostick, S.L. (2001). The history of development of academic library consortia in the United States: An overview. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 128-30.
7. Botero, C., Carrico, S. and Tenant, M.R. (2008). Using Comparative Online Usage Studies to Assess the Big Deal. Library Resources & Technical Services, 52, 60-68.
8. Campbell, J.D. (2006). Changing a cultural icon: The academic library as a virtual destination. Educause Review, 41, 16-30.
9. Cardina, C. and Wicks, D. (2004). The changing roles of academic reference librarians over a ten-year period. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 44, 133-42.
10. Carlson, S. (2001, Nov. 16,). The deserted library. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, A35-A38.
11. Chrzastowski, T.E., Naun, C.C., Norman, M. and Schmidt, K. (2007). Feast and famine: A statewide science serial collection assessment in Illinois College & Research Libraries, 68, 517-32.
12. rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Gayton, J.T. (2008). Academic libraries: 'Social' or 'communal?' The nature and future of academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34, 60-66.
14. Given, L.M. (2007). Setting the stage for undergraduates' information behaviors: Faculty and librarians' perspectives on academic space. In J.E. Buschman and G.J. Leckie (Eds.). The library as place: History, community, and culture (pp. 177-89). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
15. Grafton, A. (2009). Apocalypse in the stacks? The research library in the age of Google. Dædalus, 138, 87-98.
16. Lewis, D.W. (2007). A strategy for academic libraries in the first quarter of the 21st century. College & Research Libraries, 68, 418-34.
17. Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences,and use. Information Processing and Management, 42, 583-92.
18. Marcum, J.W. (2003). Visions: The academic library in 2012. D-Lib Magazine, 9 Retrieved July 30, 2008 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/marcum/05marcum.html.
19. Martell, C. (2008). The absent user: Physical use of academic library collections and services continues to decline 1995-2006. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34, 400-07.
20. Rider, F. 1944. The scholar and the future of the research library. New York: Hadham Press.
21. Rodwell, J. and Fairbairn, L. (2008). Dangerous liaisons? Defining the faculty liaison service model, its effectiveness and sustainability. Library Management, 29, 116-24.
22. Shumaker, D. (2009). Who let the librarians out? Embedded librarianship and the library manager. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48, 239-42, 257.
23. Wagner, A.B. and Tysick, C. (2007). Setting up shop where our patrons live. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46, 60-65.
24. Watstein, S.B. and Bell, S.J. (2007). Is there a future for the reference desk? A point-counterpoint discussion. Reference Librarian, 49, 1-20.
25. Wisner, W.H. Jan. (2001). Librarianship enters the twilight. Library Journal, 126, 68.
26. Ziliak, S.T. and McCloskey, D.N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.