A permutation test for the race model inequality

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-28

  Gondan, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77952529067     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.23     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blair, R. C., Higgins, J. J., Karniski, W., & Kromrey, J. D. (1997). A study of multivariate permutation tests which may replace Hotelling's T 2 test in prescribed circumstances. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 141-163. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2902_2
2. Blair, R. C., & Karniski, W. (1993). An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 30, 518-524. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02075.x
3. Eriksen, C. W. (1988). A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 191-193.
4. Gilchrist, W. G. (2000). Statistical modelling with quantile functions. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
5. Gondan, M., & Heckel, A. (2008). Testing the race inequality: A simple correction procedure for fast guesses. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 322-325. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.08.002
6. Gondan, M., Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2004). The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 307-313.
7. Hesterberg, T. C., Moore, D. S., Monaghan, S., Clipson, A., & Epstein, R. (2005). Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. New York: Freeman.
8. Hyndman, R. J., & Fan, Y. (1996). Sample quantiles in statistical packages. American Statistician, 50, 361-365. doi:10.2307/2684934
9. Kiesel, A., Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Systematic biases and Type I error accumulation in tests of the race model inequality. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 539-551.
10. Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164, 177-190. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
11. Maris, G., & Maris, E. (2003). Testing the race model inequality: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 507-514. doi:10.1016/S0022-2496(03)00062-2
12. Miller, J. [O.] (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-X
13. Miller, J. [O.] (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 331-343.
14. Miller, J. [O.] (2004). Exaggerated redundancy gain in the split brain: A hemispheric coactivation account. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 118-154. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.12.003
15. Pesarin, F. (2001). Multivariate permutation tests: With applications in biostatistics. New York: Wiley. Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590.
16. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
17. Schwarz, W. (1994). Diffusion, superposition, and the redundanttargets effect. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 504-520. doi:10.1006/jmps.1994.1036
18. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359. doi:10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
20. Ulrich, R., & Giray, M. (1986). Separate-activation models with variable base times: Testability and checking of cross-channel dependency. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 248-254.
21. Ulrich, R., Miller, J., & Schröter, H. (2007). Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 291-302.
22. Vorberg, D. (2008, September). Exact statistical tests of the race model and related distribution inequalities. Paper presentation at the meeting of the European Mathematical Psychology Group, Graz, Austria.