Testing the race inequality: A simple correction procedure for fast guesses

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 322-325

  Gondan, Matthias ^a   Heckel, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Divided attention; Multisensory processing; Race model

Indexed keywords

EID: 53649090946     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: 10960880     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2008.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Colonius H., and Diederich A. Race model inequality: Interpreting a geometric measure of the amount of violation. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 148-154
2. Diederich A. Probability inequalities for testing separate activation models of divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics 52 (1992) 714-716
3. Eriksen C.W. A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Perception & Psychophysics 44 (1988) 191-193
4. Feintuch U., and Cohen A. Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 361-369
5. Hughes H.C., Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Nozawa G., and Fendrich R. Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing. Saccades versus manual responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 131-153
6. Krummenacher J., Müller H., and Heller D. Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 901-917
7. Luce R.D. Response times. Their role in inferring mental organization (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
8. Maris G., and Maris E. Testing the race model inequality: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47 (2003) 507-514
9. Miller J.O. Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 247-279
10. Miller J.O. Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics 40 (1986) 331-343
11. Miller J., and Lopes A. Bias produced by fast guessing in distribution-based tests of race models. Perception & Psychophysics 50 (1991) 584-590
12. Ollman R. Fast guesses in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science 6 (1966) 155-156
13. Posner M. Orienting of attention. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980) 3-25
14. Schwarz W. On the relation between the redundant signals effect and temporal order judgments: Parametric data and a new model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 558-573
15. Tiefenau A., Neubauer H., von Specht H., and Heil P. Correcting for false alarms in a simple reaction time task. Brain Research 1122 (2006) 99-115
16. Yellott Jr. J.I. Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 8 (1971) 159-199