The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 307-313

  Gondan, Matthias ^a,b   Lange, Kathrin ^a   Rösler, Frank ^a   Röder, Brigitte ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4644306026     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196575     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. GIRAY, M., & ULRICH, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1278-1291.
2. MILLER, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
3. MILLER, J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 331-343.
4. MILLER, J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant target effect in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 160-169.
5. MINIUSSI, C., GIRELLI, M., & MARZI, C. A. (1998). Neural site of the redundant target effect electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 216-230.
6. POSNER, M. I., NISSEN, M. J., & KLEIN, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
7. RAAB, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590.
8. SCHRÖGER, E., & WIDMANN, A. (1998). Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology, 35, 755-759.
9. SPENCE, C., NICHOLLS, M. E. R., & DRIVER, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330-336.