Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv™)

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 161-167

  Lozano Chourio, M A ^a,b   Zambrano, O ^a   Gonzalez H ^a   Quero, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA   (Venezuela)

^b NONE   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARISOLV; GLUTAMIC ACID; LEUCINE; LYSINE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PAIN; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GLUTAMIC ACID; HUMANS; LEUCINE; LYSINE; MALE; MOLAR; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645459100     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: 1365263X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00719.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ericson D Zimmerman M Raber H Gotrick B Bornstein R Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries Research 1999 33 171 177.
2. Kidd E Fejerskov O Mjör I. Caries removal and the pulpo-dentinal complex. In Fejerskov O Kidd E (eds). Dental Caries. The Disease and its Clinical Management 2nd edn. Oxford Blackwell Munksgaard 2004 267 274.
3. Yazici A Atílla P Ozgünltay G Müftüoglu S. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv™ and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2003 30 1177 1182.
4. Nadanovsky P Cohen Carneio F Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods. Caries Research 2001 35 384 389.
5. Maragakis GM Hahn P Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Research 2001 35 205 210.
6. Mount G Ngo H. Minimal intervention: a new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence International 2000 31 527 533.
7. Tyas M Anusavice K Frenchen J Mount G. Minimal intervention dentistry. A review. International Dental Journal 2000 50 1 12.
8. Peters M McLean MEI. Minimal Intervention and concepts for minimal invasive cavity preparations. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2001 3 7 16.
9. Munshi A Hegde A Shetty P. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv® in the chemo-mechanical removal of carious dentin. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 2001 26 149 154.
10. Kinoshita J Kimura Y Matsumoto K. Comparative study of carious dentin removal by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and Carisolv. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery 2003 21 307 315.
11. TM for the chemo-mechanical removal of primary root caries in vivo. Caries Research 2000 34 275 280.
12. Ansari G Beeley JA Fung D. Chemomecahnical caries removal in primary teeth in a group of anxious children. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2003 30 773 779.
13. Kakabthisa A Masthisas C Staikou O Vougiouklakis G. A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method. Quintessence International 2003 34 269 271.
14. Kavvadia K Karagianni V Polychronopoulou A Papagiannouli L. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial. Pediatric Dentistry 2004 26 23 28.
15. Songpaisan Y Kulsrisombat1 K Kulsrisombat K et al. Effectiveness of caries removal using Carisolv® technique in A.R.T.? Journal of Dental Research 2002 81 272. Abstract 2121.
16. Rahimtoola S Amerongen E. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one surface cavity. Journal of Dentistry for Children 2002 1 16 26.
17. Frankl S Shire F Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? Journal of Dentistry for Children 1962 2 150 163.
18. Moran C Lynch E Peterson L Borsboom P. Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or conventional slow-speed rotatory instrument. Caries Research 1999 33 313.
19. TM) in comparison to conventional methods of caries excavation. Caries Research 2001 35 310.
20. Haffner C Benz C Folwazny M Hickel R. Chemommechanical caries removal. A clinical study. Caries Research 1999 33 312 313.
21. Fluckiger L Waltimo T Stich H Lussi A. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 2005 33 87 90.
22. Kidd EA Joyston-Bechal S Beighton D. Microbiological validation of assessment of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Research 1993 27 402 408.
23. Kidd EA Ricketts DN Beighton D. Criteria for caries removal at the enamel-dentine junction: a clinical and microbiological study. British Dental Journal 1996 180 287 291.
24. Chaussain MC Toumelin F Lasfargues J. Carisolv: multicentric prospective studies prior to commercialization on French market. Journal of Dental Research 2002 81 32. Abstract 0025.