Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response

Psychological Research

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 359-369

  Fournier, Lisa Renee ^a   Wiediger, Matthew D ^a   McMeans, Ryan ^a   Mattson, Paul S ^a   Kirkwood, Joy ^a   Herzog, Theibot ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MEMORY; MOVEMENT; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 77952429685     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0256-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fournier, L. R., Kirkwood, J., Mattson, P., & Herzog, T. (in preparation). Actions are delayed if they share a feature with an action plan held in working memory regardless of their mental representations.
2. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
3. Gathrecole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
4. Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2006). Action feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 509-523.
5. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001a). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
6. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001b). Codes and their vicissitudes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 910-937.
7. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
8. Keele, S., Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeanerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 77-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Kinsbourne, M., & Cook, J. (1971). Generalized and lateralized effects of concurrent verbalization on unimanual skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 341-345.
10. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
11. Mattson, P. S., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1236-1247.
12. Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3-26.
13. Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F., & Ahn, J. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123-142.
14. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 861-872.
15. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 125-129.
16. Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2000). Can actions effect perceptual processing? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1-17.
17. Müsseler, J., & Wühr, P. (2002). Response-envoked interference in visual encoding. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance, XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 521-537). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response code in the blindness to response compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743-767.
19. Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support processor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-842.
20. Pashler, H. & Christian, C. L. (1994). Bottlenecks in planning and producing vocal, manual and foot responses. Center for Human Information Processing Technical Report, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
21. Pashler, H., & Obrien, S. (1993). Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 315-330.
22. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer.
23. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
24. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Murata, A., & Mine, S. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand actions in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 429-438.
25. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
26. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance, XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 538-552). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Taira, M., Mine, S., Georgopoulos, A. P., Mutara, A., & Sakata, H. (1990). Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 29-36.
28. Wiediger, M., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34(5), 1136-1149.
29. Wühr, P. (2006). The Simon effect in vocal responses. Acta Psychological, 121, 210-226.
30. Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260-1270.