The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students

Sex Roles

Volumn 62, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 420-426

  Taşdemir, Nagihan ^a   Sakallı Uğurlu, Nuray ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Benevolent sexism; Hostile sexism; Islam; Muslim sample; Religiosity; Turkish sample

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952422752     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9693-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Burn, S. M., & Busso, J. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 412-418.
2. Çukur, C. Ş., DE Guzman, M. R. T., & Carlo, G. (2004). Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism-collectivism: a study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 613-634.
3. Diehl, C., Koenig, M., & Ruckdeschel, K. (2009). Religiosity and gender equality: comparing natives and Muslim migrants in Germany. Ethics and Racial Studies, 32, 278-301.
4. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
5. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
6. Glick, P., Deibold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
7. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Maser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
8. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433-441.
9. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
10. Jost, J. T., & Hundady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265.
11. Kaǧi{dotless}tçi{dotless}başi{dotless}, Ç. (1982). Sex roles, family and community in Turkey. In Ç. Kaǧi{dotless}tçi{dotless}başi{dotless} & D. Sunar (Eds.), Sex roles, value of children and fertility (pp. 151-180). Bloomington: Indiana University, Turkish Studies.
12. Morgan, M. Y. (1987). The impact of religion on gender-role attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 301-310.
13. Mutlu, K. (1989). Bir dindarli{dotless}k ölçeǧi: Sosyoloji'de yöntem üzerine bir tarti{dotless}şma (The religiosity scale: the discussion of methodology in sociology). İslami Araşti{dotless}rmalar (Islamic Research), 3, 194-199.
14. Sakalli{dotless}, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: the effects of patriarchy, sexism and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599-610.
15. Sakalli{dotless}-Uǧurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeǧi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çali{dotless}şmasi{dotless} (Ambivalent sexism inventory: a study of reliability and validity). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Journal of Turkish Psychology), 17, 47-58.
16. Sakalli{dotless}-Uǧurlu, N., & Ulu, S. (2003). Evlilikte kadi{dotless}na yönelik şiddete ilişkin tutumlar: Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik, yaş, eǧitim ve gelir düzeyinin etkileri. (Attitudes toward violence against women in marriage: The effects of ambivalent sexism, age, education and income levels.). Türk Psikoloji Yazi{dotless}lari{dotless} (Turkish Psychological Articles), 6, 53-65.
17. Sakalli{dotless}-Uǧurlu, N., Yalçi{dotless}n, Z. S., & Glick, F. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students' attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57, 889-895.
18. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: a meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz's model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721-734.
19. Sevim, S. A. (2006). Religious tendency and gender roles: predictors of the attitudes toward women's work roles? Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 77-86.
20. Sunar, D. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In E. Özdalga & R. Liljestrom (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.
21. Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: an overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 34, 377-394.
22. The Holy Qur'an (2008) Text, translation and commentary (Translator A. Yusuf Ali). Retrieved July 4, 2008, from http://www. diyanet. gov. tr/kuran/meal. asp?page_id=83.