Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism—collectivism: A study of turkey, the united states, and the philippines

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 613-634

  Cukur, Cem Safak ^a   De Guzman, Maria Rosario T ^b   Carlo, Gustavo ^b  

^a MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Collectivism; Individualism; Religiosity

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344228993     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.144.6.613-634     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abu-Saad, I. (1998). Individualism and Islamic work beliefs. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 377-383.
2. Adherents.com. (1999). Retrieved December 10, 2001, from http://www.adherents.com
3. Ali, A. (1988). Scaling an Islamic work-ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 575-583.
4. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.
5. Andres, T. D. (1994). Dictionary of Filipino culture and values. Quezon City, Philippines: Giraffe Books.
6. Billiet, J. B. (1995). Church involvement, individualism, and ethnic prejudice among Flemish Roman Catholics: New evidence of a moderating effect. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 224-233.
7. Brown, L. B. (1986). The psychology of religious belief. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. Byrne, P. (1989). Natural religion and the nature of religion. London: Routledge.
9. Campbell, R. A., & Curtis, J. E. (1994). Religious involvement across societies: Analyses for alternative measures of national survey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 215-229.
10. Duriez, B., Luyten, P., Snauwaert, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2002). The relative importance of religiosity and value orientations in predicting political attitudes: Empirical evidence for the continuing importance of religiosity in Flanders (Belgium). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 5, 35-54.
11. Fisher, R. D., Derison, D., Polley, C. F., Cadman, J. (1994). Religiousness, religious orientation, and attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 614-630.
12. Furnham, A. (1990). A content, correlational and factor analysis study of seven questionnaire measures of the Protestant work ethic. Human Relations, 43, 383-399.
13. Gelfand, M. J., Triandis, H. C., & Chan, D. K.-S. (1996). Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 397-410.
14. Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Psychology on religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 201-221.
15. Gorsuch, R. L., & McFarland, S. G. (1972). Single vs. multiple scales for measuring religious values. Journal of Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 53-64.
16. Greeley, A. (1989). Religious change in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
18. Hood, R. W., Spilka, B., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford.
19. Huismans, S. (1994). The impact of differences in religion on the relation between religiosity and values. In A. Bouvy, F. J. R van de Vijver, P. Boski, and P. Schmitz (Eds.), Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 255-268). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
20. Huismans, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Religiosity and value priorities: A study of Protestants, Catholic, and Jews. In S. Iwawaki, Y. Kashima, and K. Leung (Eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 237-249). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
21. Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, and C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-51). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Kim, U. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 19-40). London: Sage.
23. Lau, S. (1989). Religious schema and values. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 137-156.
24. Leung, F. T. L., & Brown, M. (1995). Theoretical issues in cross-cultural career development: Cultural validity and cultural specificity. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology (pp. 143-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Loewenthal, K. M. (2000). The psychology of religion. Boston, MA: Oneworld Publications.
26. Meyer, K., Rizzo, H., & Ali, Y. (1998). Islam and extension of citizenship rights to women in Kuwait. Journal of Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 131-144.
27. Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism-collectivism. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 24, 1177-1189.
28. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-73.
29. Peng, K., Nisbett, R. E., & Wong, N. (1997). Validity problems of cross-cultural value comparison and possible solutions. Psychological Methods, 2, 329-341.
30. Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology): A legacy of Virgilio Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49-71.
31. Ramirez, M. M. (1997). The Filipino worldview and values. In T. B. Obusan and A. R. Ramirez (Eds.), The Filipino spiritual culture (pp. 3-14). Manila, Philippines: Mama-mathala.
32. Reimer, S. H. (1995). A look at cultural effects on religiosity: A comparison between the United States and Canada. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 445-457.
33. Roccas, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Church-state relations and the association of religiosity with values. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 356-375.
34. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
35. Sampson, E. E. (2000). Reinterpreting individualism and collectivism: Their religious roots and monologic versus dialogic person-other relationship. American Psychologist, 55, 1425-1432.
36. Schroeder, R. (1992). Max Weber and the sociology of culture. Newbury Park, London: Sage.
37. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
38. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values: Theoretical and methodological approaches to study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 85-123). London: Sage.
39. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure and contents of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
40. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88-107.
41. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92-116.
42. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. S., & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
43. Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collective culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. Theoretical and methodological approaches to study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 123-137). London: Sage.
44. Steinberg, D. J. (1990). The Philippines: A singular and a plural place. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45. Stirred, R. (1992). Max Weber and the sociology of culture. London: Sage.
46. Triandis, H. C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 19-41). London: Sage.
47. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48. Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
49. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurements of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 275-289.
50. The universal almanac. (1996). Kansas City, MO: Andrews & McMeel.
51. U.S. Department of State. (1999, September 9). Annual report on international religious freedom for 1999: Philippines. Retrieved December 9, 2001, from http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/irf/irf_rpt/1999/irf_philippi99.html
52. Verbit, M. F. (1970). The components and dimensions of religious behavior: Toward a reconceptualization of religiosity. In P. E. Hammond & B. Johnson (Eds.), American mosaic (pp. 24-39). New York: Random House.
53. Weber, I. (2000). The Filipino perspective on death and dying. In J. K. Parry & A. S. Ryan (Eds.), A cross-cultural look at death, dying, and religion (pp. 215-220). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
54. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster.
55. Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Yates, M. (1999). Religion, community service, and identity in American youth. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 243-253.