Organ donation on web 2.0: Content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube

Health Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 238-246

  Tian, Yan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTH; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; TRANSPLANTATION; VIDEORECORDING;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; PERCEPTION; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 77952391528     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410231003698911     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abadiea, A. & Gay, S. (2006). The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. Journal of Health Economics, 25, 599-620.
2. Aspden, P. & Katz, J. E. (2000). Assessment of quality of health care information and referrals to physicians: A nationwide survey. In R. E. Rice & J. E. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 99-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Beckjord, E. B., Rutten, L. J. F., Squiers, L, Arora, N. K, Volckmann, L, Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2007). Use of the Internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: Estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(3), e20. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2047283
4. Boulos, M. N. K., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 2-23.
5. Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2008). Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58, 428-446.
6. Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2005). Developing a profile of consumer intention to seek out additional information beyond a doctor: The role of communicative and motivation variables. Health Communication, 17, 1-16.
7. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
8. Entman, R. M (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
9. Feeley, T. H., & Servoss, T. J. (2005). Examining college students' intentions to become organ donors. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 237-249.
10. Feeley, T. H., & Vincent, D. (2007). How organ donation is represented in newspaper articles in the United States. Health Communication, 21, 125-131.
11. Flynn, D. (2007, October 29). Watch this space. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 12.
12. Fox, S. (2006). Online health search 2006. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf
13. Freeman, B., & Chapman, S. (2007). Is "YouTube" telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco Control, 16, 207-210.
14. Gandy, O. H., Jr. (2001). Epilogue-Framing at the horizon: A retrospective assessment. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 355-377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gavgani, V. Z., & Mohan, V. V. (2008). Application of Web 2.0 tools in medical librarianship to support medicine 2.0. Webology, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.webology.ir/2008/v5n1/a53.html
16. Giustini, D. (2006). How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. British Medical Journal, 333, 1283-1284.
17. Keelan, J., Pavri-Garcia, V., Tomlinson, G., & Wilson, K. (2007). YouTube as a source of information on immunization: A content analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 2482-2484.
18. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8, 73-103.
19. Kunst, H., Groot, D., Latthe, P. M., Latthe, M., & Khan, K. S. (2002). Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: Survey of five common health topics. British Medical Journal, 324, 581-582.
20. MacLean, F. (2008, June 8). A lesson for today's politician: Get yourself on YouTube. Toronto Star, p A15.
21. Matesanz, R., & Miranda, B. (1996). Organ donation-The role of the media and of public opinion. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 11, 2127-2128.
22. th ed.). London: Sage.
23. Miller, M. M., and Riechert, B. P. (2001). The spiral of opportunity and frame resonance: Mapping the issue cycle in news and public discourse. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 107-122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Morgan, S. E., Harrison, T. R., Chewning, L., Davis, L., & Dicorcia, M. (2007). Entertainment (mis)education: The framing of organ donation in entertainment television. Health Communication, 22, 143-151.
25. Morgan, S. E., Harrison, T. R., Long, S. D., Afifi, W.A., Stephenson, M. S., & Reichert, T. (2005). Family discussions about organ donation: How the media influences opinions about donation decisions. Clinical Transplantation, 19, 674-682.
26. Napoli, P. M. (2000). Consumer use of medical information from electronic and paper media: A literature review. In R. E. Rice & J. E. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 79-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. National Cancer Institute. (2005). Health information National Trends Survey II. Retrieved from http://hints.cancer.gov/hints/questions/qDisplay.jsp?specCase=0&qID=1319&dataset=2005
28. Perez-Pena, R. (2008, June 2). Underdog taps YouTube to make election close. New York Times, p 6.
29. Quick, B. L., Meyer, K. R., Kim, D K., Taylor, D., Kline, J., Apple, T., & Newman, J. D. (2007). Examining the association between media coverage of organ donation and organ transplantation rates. Clinical Transplantation, 21, 219-223.
30. Reese, S. D. (2003). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Rhodebeck, L. A. (1998, April). Framing policy debates on old age. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
32. Roberts, J. M., & Copeland, K. L. (2001). Clinical websites are currently dangerous to health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 62, 181-187.
33. Robinson, J. D., & Tian, Y. (2009). Cancer patients and the provision of informational social support. Health Communication, 24, 381-390.
34. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.
35. Shaub, E. J., Shapiro, J., & Radecki, S. (1998). Do patients want to talk to their physicians about organ donation? Attitudes and knowledge about organ donation: A study of Orange County, California. Journal of Community Health, 23, 407-417.
36. Skumanich, S. A., & Kintsfather, D. P. (1996). Promoting the organ donor card: A causal model of persuasion effects. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 401-408.
37. Tankard, J. W. (2003). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Thompson, T. L., Robinson, J. D., & Kenny, R. W. (2003). Gender differences in family communication about organ donation. Sex Roles, 49, 587-596.
39. Thompson, T. L., Robinson, J. D., & Kenny, R. W. (2004). Family discussions about organ donation. Progress in Transplantation, 14, 49-55.
40. United Network for Organ Sharing. (2008). Retrieved from www.unos.org