Rules of application and mode of action of transcranial direct current stimulation in neurorehabilitation: Primary motor cortex;Zasady stosowania i mechanizm działania przezczaszkowej stymulacji pra̧dem stałym w neurorehabilitacji: Dane z badań kory ruchowej

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 172-180

  Polanowska, Katarzyna ^a   Seniów, Joanna ^a   Członkowska, Anna ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Brain polarization; Neurorehabilitation; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; DIRECT CURRENT; HUMAN; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; POLARIZATION; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 77952370125     PISSN: 00283843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3843(14)60008-6     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Priori A., Berardelli A., Rona S. i wsp. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 2257-2260. (Pubitemid 28338216)
2. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000; 527: 633-639.
3. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001; 57: 1899-1901.
4. Nitsche M.A., Fregni F. Transcranial direct current stimulation - an adjuvant tool for the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases? Curr Psychiatr Rev 2007, 3: 222-232.
5. Bolognini N., Pascual-Leone A., Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 1-13.
6. Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology - perspectives on the terapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007; 3: 383-393.
7. Nowak D.A., Grefkes C., Ameli M. i wsp. Interhemispheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 641-656.
8. Webster B.R., Celnik P.A., Cohen L.G. Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRx 2006; 3: 474-481.
9. Schlaug G., Renga V., Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 1571-1576.
10. Boggio P.S., Khoury L.P., Martins D.S. i wsp. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 444-447.
11. Straburzyńska-Lupa A., Straburzyński G. Fizjoterapia. Wyd. 3. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2004, ss. 439-601.
12. Lang N., Siebner H.R., Ward N.S. i wsp. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci 2005; 22: 495-504.
13. Nitsche M.A., Liebetanz D., Lang N. i wsp. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 2220-2222.
14. Nitsche M.A, Niehaus L., Hoffmann K.T. i wsp. MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 2419-2423.
15. Gandiga P.C., Hummel F.C., Cohen L.G. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 845-850.
16. Poreisz C., Boros K., Antal A. i wsp. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull 2007; 72: 208-214.
17. Ridding M.C. Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2003; 127: 193-197.
18. Priori A. Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 589-595.
19. Ardolino G., Bossi B., Barberi S. i wsp. Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 2005; 568: 653-663.
20. Baudewig J., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. i wsp. Regional modulation of BOLD MRI responses to human sensorimotor activation by transcranial direct current stimulation. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 196-201.
21. Froc D.J., Chapman C.A., Trepel C. i wsp. Long term depression and depotentation in the sensorimotor cortex of the freely moving rat. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 438-445.
22. Antal A., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex. Brain Res Bull 2006; 68: 459-463.
23. Nitsche M.A., Seeber A., Frommann K. i wsp. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of human motor cortex. J Physiol 2005; 568: 291-303.
24. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Mansur C.G. i wsp. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005; 16: 1551-1555.
25. Nitsche M.A., Fricke K., Henschke U. i wsp. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial DC stimulation. J Physiol 2003; 553: 293-301.
26. Liebetanz D., Nitsche M.A., Tergau F. i wsp. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulationinduced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002; 125: 2238-2247.
27. Nitsche M.A., Jaussi W., Libetanz D. i wsp. Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29: 1573-1578.
28. Kossut M. Wstȩp do neuroplastycznooeci. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2002; 36: S11-S21.
29. Hurtado O., Pradillo J.M., Alonso-Escolano D. i wsp. Neurorepair versus neuroprotection in stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 21: S54-S63.
30. Kreisel S.H., Hennrici M.G., Bäzner H. Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: the natural course of clinical recovery, use-dependent plasticity and rehabilitative outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 243-255. (Pubitemid 46425791)
31. Kwakkel G., Kollen B., Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281-299. (Pubitemid 39480654)
32. Reis J., Robertson E., Krakauer J.W. i wsp. Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?". Brain Stimulat 2008; 1: 363-369.
33. Reis J., Schambra H.M., Cohen L.G. i wsp. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 1590-1595.
34. Nitsche M.A., Liebetnz D., Schlitterlau A. i wsp. GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19: 2720-2726.
35. Nitsche M.A., Lampe C., Antal A. i wsp. Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 23: 1651-1657.
36. Scheidtmann K., Fries W., Muller F. i wsp. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet 2001; 358: 787-789.
37. Floel A., Breitenstein C., Hummel F. i wsp. Dopaminergic influences of formation of a motor memory. Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 121-130. (Pubitemid 40962467)
38. Floel A., Hummel F., Breitenstein C. i wsp. Dopaminergic effects on encoding of a motor memory in chronic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65: 472-474.
39. Seniów J., Litwin M., Litwin T. i wsp. New approach to the rehabilitation of post-stroke focal cognitive syndrome: Effect of levodopa combined with speech and language therapy on functional recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci 2009; 283: 214-218.
40. Walker-Batson D., Cutris S., Natarajan R. i wsp. A double-blind placebo controlled study of the use of amphetamine in therapy of aphasia. Stroke 2001; 32: 2093-2098.
41. Kinsbourne M. Mechanisms of hemispheric interaction in man. W: Kinsbourne M., Smith W.I. [red.]. Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Thomas, Springfield 1974, ss. 260-285.
42. Reis J., Swayne O.B., Vandermeeren Y. i wsp. Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor conrol. J Physiol 2008; 586: 325-351.
43. Hummel F.C., Cohen L.G. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 708-712.
44. Rijntjes M. Mechanism of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: new insight, old questions and the meaning of therapies. Curr Opin Neurol 2006; 19: 76-83. (Pubitemid 43172709)
45. Saur D., Lange R., Baumgaertner A. i wsp. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006; 129: 1371-1384.
46. Hummel F., Celnik P., Giraux P. i wsp. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005; 128: 490-499. (Pubitemid 40380185)
47. Boggio P.S., Nunesa A., Rigonattia S.P. i wsp. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 123-129.
48. Hesse S., Werner C., Schonhardt E.M. i wsp. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: A pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 9-15. (Pubitemid 46631009)
49. Siebner H.R., Lang N., Rizzo V. i wsp. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 3379-3385. (Pubitemid 38451903)
50. Celnik P., Paik N.J., Vandermeeren Y. i wsp. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 1764-1771.