Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: A multilevel analysis in Calvados, France

Cancer Epidemiology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 309-315

  Pornet, Carole ^a,b,c   Dejardin, Olivier ^a,b,c   Morlais, Fabrice ^a,b,c   Bouvier, Véronique ^a,b,c   Launoy, Guy ^a,b,c  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^c CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Healthcare supply; Mammography; Multilevel analysis; Screening; Socioeconomic factors

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 77952240718     PISSN: 18777821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. French center of epidemiology on the medical causes of death (CépiDC). Interrogations des données (1979-2006) - Données détaillées - Available at: http://www.cepidc.vesinet.inserm.fr [accessed on 01 October 2009].
2. Cancer Research UK. CancerStats key facts on breast cancer. Available at: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/breast/#mortality [accessed on 01 October 2009].
3. Nyström L., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., Frisell J., Nordenskjöld B., and Rutqvist L.E. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 359 (2002) 909-919
4. Hendrick R.E., Klabunde C., Grivegne A., Pou G., and Ballard-Barbash R. Technical quality control practives in mammography screening programs in 22 countries. Int J Qual Health Care 14 (2002) 219-226
5. Miles A., Cockburn J., Smith R.A., and Wardle J. A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer 101 Suppl. 5 (2004) 1201-1213
6. French National Institute for Public Health Surveillance (Institut de Veille Sanitaire). Evaluation épidémiologique du programme de dépistage du cancer du sein. Available at: http://www.invs.sante.fr/surveillance/cancers/default.htm [accessed on 01 October 2009].
7. Kothari A.R., and Birch S. Individual and regional determinants of mammography uptake. Can J Public Health 95 (2004) 290-294
8. Dailey A.B., Kasl S.V., Holford T.R., Calvocoressi L., and Jones B.A. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic predictors of nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16 (2007) 2293-2303
9. Litaker D., and Tomolo A. Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection. J Women's Health 16 (2007) 36-45
10. Zackrisson S., Lindström M., Moghaddassi M., Andersson I., and Janzon L. Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis. Scand J Public Health 35 (2007) 548-554
11. Hyndman J.C.G., Holman C.D.J., and Dawes V.P. Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. J Med Screen 7 (2000) 141-145
12. Benjamins M.R., Kirby J.B., and Bond Huie S.A. County characteristics and racial and ethnic disparities in the use of preventive services. Prev Med 39 (2004) 704-712
13. Glazier R.H., Creatore M.I., Gozdiyra P., Matheson F.I., Steele L.S., Boyle E., et al. Geographic methods for understanding and responding to disparities in mammography use in Toronto, Canada. J Gen Intern Med 19 (2004) 952-961
14. Rosenberg L., wise L.A., Palmer J.R., Horton N.J., and Adams-Campbell L.L. A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14 (2005) 2628-2633
15. Coughlin S.S., Leadbetter S., Richards T., and Sabatino S.A. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med 66 (2008) 260-275
16. Lian M., Jeffe D.B., and Schootman M. Racial and geographic differences in mammography screening in St. Louis City: a multilevel study. J Urban Health 85 (2008) 677-692
17. Mobley L.R., Kuo T.M., and Andrews L. How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context? A case study of mammography use in California. Med Care Res Rev 65 (2008) 315-337
18. Maheswaran R., Pearson T., Jordan H., and Black D. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 60 (2006) 208-212
19. Schootman M., Jeffe D.B., Baker E.A., and Walker M.S. Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J Epidemiol Community Health 60 (2006) 202-207
20. Engelman K.K., Hawley D.B., Gazaway R., Mosier M.C., Ahluwalia J.S., and Ellerbeck F. Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. J Am Geriatr Soc 50 (2002) 62-68
21. French National Institute for Public Health Surveillance (Institut de Veille Sanitaire). Cahier des charges relatif à l'organisation du dépistage des cancers, aux structures de gestion, aux radiologues, annexes à la convention-type entre les organismes d'assurance maladie et les professionnels de santé. Bull Off 2001.43. Available at: http://www.invs.sante.fr/surveillance/cancers_depistage/cdc.pdf [accessed on 01 October 2009].
22. Townsend P. Deprivation. J Soc Policy 16 (1987) 125-378
23. Krieger N., Williams D., and Moss N. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18 (1997) 341-378
24. Guagliardo M.F. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr 3 (2004) 3. http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/3/1/3 Available at: http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/3/1/3 [accessed on 01 October 2009].
25. Pornet C., Dejardin O., Morlais F., Bouvier V., and Launoy G. Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health (2009) published online 8 Sep 2009; doi:10.1136/jech.2008.081117 [accessed on 01 October 2009].
26. Duport N., Ancelle-Park R., Boussac-Zarebska M., Uhry Z., and Bloch J. Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Prev 17 (2008) 218-224
27. Esteva M., Ripoll J., Leiva A., Sanchez-Contador C., and Collado F. Determinants of nonattendance to mammography program in a region with high voluntary health insurance coverage. BMC Public Health 8 (2008) 387 10.1186/1471-2458/8/387
28. Schueler K.M., Chu P.W., and Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of literature. J Women's Heath 17 (2008) 1477-1498
29. Cronin K.A., Miglioretti D.L., Krapcho M., Yu B., Geller B.M., Carney P.A., et al. Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18 (2009) 1699-1705
30. Wells K.J., Battaglia T.A., Dudley D.J., Garcia R., Greened A., Calhoun E., et al. The Patient Navigation Research Program Patient naviagation: state of the art or is it science?. Cancer 113 (2008) 1999-2010