Racial and geographic differences in mammography screening in St. Louis City: A multilevel study

Journal of Urban Health

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 677-692

  Lian, Min ^a   Jeffe, Donna B ^a,b   Schootman, Mario ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cluster; Geocoding; Mammography; Random digit dialing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST TUMOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RACE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MISSOURI;

EID: 56149123013     PISSN: 10993460     EISSN: 14682869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-008-9301-z     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43-66.
2. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, et al. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1245-1256. (Pubitemid 40327910)
3. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, et al. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704-1713. (Pubitemid 33130259)
4. Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997)-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ. 1999;48:1-22.
5. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, et al. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97:1528-1540. (Pubitemid 36297783)
6. Jones AR, Caplan LS, Davis MK. Racial/ethnic differences in the self-reported use of screening mammography. J Commun Health. 2003;28:303-316. (Pubitemid 38113241)
7. Benjamins MR, Kirby JB, Bond Huie SA. County characteristics and racial and ethnic disparities in the use of preventive services. Prev Med. 2004;39:704-712. (Pubitemid 39194732)
8. Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, et al. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:260-275.
9. Breen N, Cronin KA, Meissner HI, et al. Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern? Cancer. 2007;109:2405-2409. (Pubitemid 46906458)
10. Ryerson AB, Miller J, Eheman CR, et al. Use of mammograms among women aged 9/= 40 years-United States, 2000-2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:49-51.
11. Roche LM, Skinner R, Weinstein RB. Use of a geographic information system to identify and characterize areas with high proportions of distant stage breast cancer. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002;8:26-32.
12. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Gillanders WE, et al. Geographic clustering of adequate diagnostic follow-up after abnormal screening results for breast cancer among lowincome women in Missouri. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:704-712. (Pubitemid 47277514)
13. Sheehan TJ, DeChello LM. A space-time analysis of the proportion of late stage breast cancer in Massachusetts, 1988 to 1997. Int J Health Geogr. 2005;4:15.
14. MacKinnon JA, Duncan RC, Huang Y, et al. Detecting an association between socioeconomic status and late stage breast cancer using spatial analysis and area-based measures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:756-762. (Pubitemid 46650578)
15. Lane DS, Zapka J, Breen N, et al. A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. For the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Prev Med. 2000;31:481-493.
16. Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR, Kerner JF. Equitable access to cancer services: a review of barriers to quality care. Cancer. 1999;86:2378-2390. (Pubitemid 30010381)
17. US Preventive Services Task Force. Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:I-47.
18. Leitch AM, Dodd GD, Costanza M, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:150-153. (Pubitemid 27226281)
19. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Technical Information and Data: Summary Data Quality Reports. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical-infodata/ quality.htm. Accessed on May 26, 2007.
20. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1672-1680. (Pubitemid 36459474)
21. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, et al. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of areabased measure and geographic level matter? the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471-482. (Pubitemid 34976986)
22. Harris RP, FletcherSW,Gonzalez JJ, et al.Mammography and age: are we targeting thewrong women? A community survey of women and physicians. Cancer. 1991;67:2010-2014.
23. Caplan LS, Wells BL, Haynes S. Breast cancer screening among older racial/ethnic minorities and whites: barriers to early detection. J Gerontol. 1992;47:101-110.
24. Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:62-67. (Pubitemid 24023513)
25. Hardy RE, Ahmed NU, Hargreaves MK, et al. Difficulty in reaching low-income women for screening mammography. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2000;11:45-57.
26. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, et al. Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:955-961. (Pubitemid 30366982)
27. Bryant H, Mah Z. Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviors of rural and urban women. Prev Med. 1992;21:405-418.
28. Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs Res. 1993;42:139-143.
29. Skinner CS, Arfken CL, Sykes RK. Knowledge, perceptions, and mammography stage of adoption among older urban women. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:54-63. (Pubitemid 28099237)
30. Champion VL. Beliefs about breast cancer and mammography by behavioral stage. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994;21:1009-1014.
31. Fulton JP, Buechner JS, Scott HD, et al. A study guided by the Health Belief Model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Public Health Rep. 1991;106:410-420.
32. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, et al. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 1994;13:122-129.
33. Smith RA, Haynes S. Barriers to screening for breast cancer. Cancer. 1992;69:1968-1978.
34. Conry CM, Main DS, Miller RS, et al. Factors influencing mammogram ordering at the time of the office visit. J Fam Pract. 1993;37:356-360. (Pubitemid 23303214)
35. Ware JE Jr. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:327-354.
36. Skinner CS, Sykes RK, Monsees BS, et al. Learn, share, and live: breast cancer education for older, urban minority women. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:60-78. (Pubitemid 128456205)
37. Crawford CB, Ferguson GA. A general rotation criterion and its use in orthogonal rotation. Psychometrika. 1970;35:321-332.
38. Lautenschlager GJ. A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1989;24:365-395.
39. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
40. Schootman M, Jeffe DB. Identifying factors associated with disability-related differences in breast cancer screening (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:97-107. (Pubitemid 36539516)
41. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1-10.
42. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
43. Dailey AB, Kasl SV, Holford TR, et al. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic predictors of nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:2293-2303. (Pubitemid 351222388)
44. O'Malley AS, Renteria-Weitzman R, Huerta EE, et al. Patient and provider priorities for cancer prevention and control: a qualitative study in Mid-Atlantic Latinos. Ethn Dis. 2002;12:383-391.
45. Calvocoressi L, Kasl SV, Lee CH, et al. A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:2096-2105. (Pubitemid 40054304)
46. Hyndman JC, Holman CD, Dawes VP. Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. J Med Screen. 2000;7:141-145.
47. Zenk SN, Tarlov E, Sun J. Spatial equity in facilities providing low- or no-fee screening mammography in Chicago neighborhoods. J Urban Health. 2006;83:195-210. (Pubitemid 44354667)
48. Casey MM, Thiede Call K, Klingner JM. Are rural residents less likely to obtain recommended preventive healthcare services? Am J Prev Med. 2001;21:182-188.
49. Missouri Cancer Registry. Cancer MICA. http://www.dhss.mo.gov/CancerMICA/ index.html. Accessed on September 26, 2007.
50. Chang SW, Kerlikowske K, Napoles-Springer A, et al. Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography. Cancer. 1996;78:1395-1402. (Pubitemid 26317859)
51. Jones BA, Reams K, Calvocoressi L, et al. Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:531-538. (Pubitemid 47280207)