Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: In vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays

Radiology

Volumn 236, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 872-878

  Pickhardt, Perry J ^a,b   Lee, Andrew D ^a   McFarland, Elizabeth C ^c,d   Taylor, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 23844545552     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2363041534     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dachman AH, Zalis ME. Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 2004;230:319-323.
2. McFarland EG. Reader strategies for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002;27: 275-283.
3. McFarland EG, Pilgram TK, Brink JA, et al. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 2002;225:380-390.
4. Pickhardt PJ. CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementation. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:1-4.
5. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:127-134.
6. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291: 1713-1719.
7. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125:311-319.
8. Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125:304-310.
9. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauet AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001;219:685-692.
10. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001;219: 461-465.
11. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000;216:704-711.
12. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 2000;217:765-771.
13. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1496-1S03.
14. Whiting BR, McFarland EG, Brink JA. Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation. Radiology 2000;217:165-172.
15. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1343-1347.
16. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U, et al. Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:497-502.
17. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349: 2191-2200.
18. Pickhardt PJ. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1599-1606.
19. Pickhardt PJ, Lehman VT, Winter TC, Taylor AJ. Polyp volume versus linear size measurement at CT colonography: implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol (in press).