The negative educational gradients in Romanian fertility

Demographic Research

Volumn 22, Issue , 2010, Pages 95-114

  Mureşan, Cornelia ^a   Hoem, Jan M ^b  

^a BABE BOLYAI UNIVERSITY   (Romania)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952049402     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Gjonca, A., Aassve, A., and Mencarini, L. (2008). Albania: Trends and patterns, proximate determinants and policies of fertility change. Demographic Research 19(11): 261-292. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.11.
3. Hǎrǎguş, P.-T. (2005). Folosirea timpului şi sarcinile domestice în Europa (Time use and domestic work in Europe). Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Sociologia 2: 95-116.
4. Hoem, B. (1996). The social meaning of the age at second birth for third-birth fertility: A methodological note on the need to sometimes re-specify an intermediate variable. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland 33: 333-339.
5. Hoem, J.M., Prskawetz, A., and Neyer, G.R. (2001). Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria, 1975-96. Population Studies 55(3): 249-261. doi:10.1080/00324720127700.
6. Hoem, J.M. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2006). Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research. Part 1: The role of education in the study of first childbearing. Demographic Research 15(16): 461-484. doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2006.15.16.
7. Köppen, K. (2006). Second births in Western Germany and France. Demographic Research 14(14): 295-330. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.14.
8. Koytcheva, E. (2006). Social-demographic differences of fertility and union formation in Bulgaria before and after the start of the societal transition. [PhD dissertation] University of Rostock, Available from the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
9. Kravdal, Ø. (2001). The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: An artefact of separate modelling of each parity transition. Demographic Research 5(6): 185-215. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2001.5.6.
10. Kravdal, Ø. (2004). An illustration of the problems caused by incomplete education histories in fertility analyses. Demographic Research SC3(6): 135-154. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.6.
11. Kreyenfeld, M. (2002). Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women's education on second birth risks in West Germany. Demographic Research 7(2): 15-47. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.2.
12. Kreyenfeld, M. and Zabel, C. (2005). Female education and the second child: Great Britain and Western Germany compared. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften/Schmollers Jahrbuch 125: 145-156.
13. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research 17(1): 1-16. doi:10.1007/BF03029445.
14. Mureşan, C. (1996). L'évolution démographique en Roumanie: Tendances passées (1948-1994) et perspectives d'avenir (1995-2030). Population 51(4/5): 813-844.
15. Mureşan, C. (2008). Impact of induced abortion on fertility in Romania. European Journal of Population 24(4): 425-446. doi:10.1007/s10680-008-9151-0.
16. Mureşan, C., Hǎrǎguş, P.-T., Hǎrǎguş, M., and Schröder, C. (2008). Overview Chapter 6: Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context. Demographic Research 19(23): 855-906. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.23.
17. Oláh, L. (2003). Gendering fertility: second births in Sweden and Hungary. Population Research and Policy Review 22(2): 171-200. doi:10.1023/A:1025089031871.
18. Perelli-Harris, B. (2008). Ukraine: On the border between old and new in uncertain times. Demographic Research 19(29): 1145-1178. doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2008.19.29.
19. Zabel, C. (2009). Do imputed educational histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the West German context? Demographic Research 21(6): 135-176. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.6.