Erratum to: Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons (Accred Qual Assur, (2009), 14, (553-563), 10.1007/s00769-009-0547-2);Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 553-563

  Toman, Blaza ^a   Possolo, Antonio ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Consistent subset; Degrees of equivalence; Fixed effect; Random effects; Reference value; Statistical model

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952011708     PISSN: 09491775     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00769-010-0707-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57: 289-300.
2. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), and International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO/IEC Guide 98: 1995. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland.
3. Chunovkina AG, Elster C, Lira I, Wöger W (2008) Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases. Metrologia 45(2): 211-216.
4. Comité international des poids et mesures (CIPM). Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Pavillon de Breteuil, Sèvres, France, October 14th 1999. Technical Supplement revised in October 2003.
5. Cox MG (2002) The evaluation of key comparison data. Metrologia 39: 589-595.
6. Cox MG (2007) The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset. Metrologia 44: 187-200.
7. Davison AC, Hinkley D (1997) Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
8. Decker JE, Brown N, Cox MG, Steele AG, Douglas RJ (2006) Recent recommendations of the consultative committee for length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison data. Metrologia 43: L51-L55.
9. Hochberg Y, Tamhane A (1987) Multiple comparison procedures. Wiley, New York.
10. Iyer HK, Wang CM, Vecchia DF (2004) Consistency tests for key comparison data. Metrologia 41: 223-230.
11. Kacker R, Forbes A, Kessel R, Sommer K-D (2008) Classical and Bayesian interpretation of the Birge test of consistency and its generalized version for correlated results from interlaboratory evaluations. Metrologia 45(3): 257-264.
12. Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10: 325-337.
13. Martin AD, Quinn KM, Park JH (2008) MCMCpack: Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Package, (2008) URL http://mcmcpack. wustl. ed.. R package version 0. 9-5.
14. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York.
15. Possolo A, Toman B (2007) Assessment of measurement uncertainty via observation equations. Metrologia 44: 464-475.
16. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, (2008) URL http://www. R-project. or. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
17. Schantz M, Wise S (2004) CCQM-K25: determination of PCB congeners in sediment. Metrologia 41(Technical Supplement): 08001.
18. Searle SR (1971) Linear models. Wiley, New York.
19. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York.
20. Toman B (2007a) Bayesian approaches to calculating a reference value in key comparison experiments. Technometrics 49(1): 81-87.
21. Toman B (2007b) Statistical interpretation of key comparison degrees of equivalence based on distributions of belief. Metrologia 44(2): L14-L17.
22. Wasserman L (2004) All of statistics, a concise course in statistical inference. Springer, New York.
23. Zhang NF (2006) The uncertainty associated with the weighted mean of measurement data. Metrologia 43(3): 195-204.