Post hoc power estimation in large-scale multiple testing problems

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1050-1056

  Zehetmayer, Sonja ^a   Posch, Martin ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUMOR MARKER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOMICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 77951952519     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq085     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 57, 289-300.
2. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (2000) On the adaptive control of the false discovery fate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J. Educ. Behav. Stat., 25, 60-83.
3. Benjamini,Y. and Yekutieli,D. (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat., 29, 1165-1188.
4. Benjamini,Y. et al. (2006) Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491-507.
5. Broberg,P. (2005)Acomparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 199-219.
6. Craiu,R. and Sun,L. (2008) Choosing the lesser evil: trade-off between false discovery rate and non-discovery rate. Stat. Sin., 18, 861-879.
7. Dalmasso,C. et al. (2005) A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics, 21, 660-668.
8. Delongchamp,R.R. et al. (2004) Multiple-testing strategy for analyzing cDNA array data on gene expression. Biometrics, 60, 774-782.
9. Efron,B. (2007a) Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. JASA, 102, 93-103.
10. Efron,B. (2007b) Size, power and false discovery rates. Ann. Stat., 35, 1351-1377.
11. Efron,B. (2010) Correlated z-values and the accuracy of large-scale statistical estimates. JASA, in press.
12. Genovese,C. and Wasserman,L. (2002) Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 64, 499-517.
13. Gruvberger,S. et al. (2001) Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res., 61, 5979-5984.
14. Hoenig,J. and Heisey,D. (2001) The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am. Stat., 55, 19-24.
15. Hsueh,H. et al. (2003) Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true hypotheses in multiplicity testing. J. Biopharm. Stat., 13, 675-689.
16. Huang,Y. et al. (2001) Gene expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma reveals highly consistent profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 15044-15049.
17. Jin,J. and Cai,T. (2007) Estimating the null and the proportion of nonnull effects in large-scale multiple comparisons. JASA, 102, 495-506.
18. Johnstone,I. and Silverman,B. (2004) Needles and straw in haystacks: empirical Bayes estimates of possibly sparse sequences. Ann. Stat., 32, 1594-1649.
19. Langaas,M. et al. (2005) Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to dna microarray data. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 67, 555-572.
20. Meinshausen,N. and Rice,J. (2006) Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses. Ann. Stat., 34, 373-393.
21. Norris,A.W. and Kahn,C.R. (2006) Analysis of gene expression in pathophysiological states: balancing false discovery and false negative rates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 649-653.
22. Owen,A.B. (2005) Variance of the number of false discoveries. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 67, 411-426.
23. Pavlidis,P. et al. (2003) The effect of replication on gene expression microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 19, 1620-1627.
24. Pawitan,Y. et al. (2005) False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies. Bioinformatics, 21, 3017-3024.
25. Posch, M. et al. (2009) Hunting for significance with the false discovery rate. JASA, 104, 836-840.
26. Pounds,S. and Cheng,C. (2004) Improving false discovery rate estimation. Bioinformatics, 20, 1737-1745.
27. Pounds,S. and Morris,S. (2003) Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics, 19, 1236-1242.
28. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org.
29. Sarkar,S.K. (2004) FDR-controlling stepwise procedures and their false negatives rates. J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 125, 119-137.
30. Schweder,T. and Spjotvoll,E. (1982). Plots of p-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika, 69, 493-502.
31. Senn,S. and Bretz,F. (2007) Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered. Pharm. Stat., 6, 161-170.
32. Storey,J.D. et al. (2004) Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 66, 187-205.
33. Storey,J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 64, 479-498.
34. Storey,J. and Tibshirani,R. (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9440-9445.
35. Strimmer,K. (2008) A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 303-317.
36. Victor,A. and Hommel,G. (2007) Combining adaptive designs with control of the false discovery rate a generalized definition for a global p-value. Biometrical J., 49, 94-106.
37. Zehetmayer,S. et al. (2005) Two-stage designs for experiments with a large number of hypotheses. Bioinformatics, 21, 3771-3777.
38. Zehetmayer,S. et al. (2008) Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family wise error rate. Stat. Med., 27, 4145-4160.