Cross-cultural consensus for waist-hip ratio and women's attractiveness

Evolution and Human Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 176-181

  Singh, Devendra ^a   Dixson, B J ^b   Jessop, T S ^c   Morgan, B ^d,e   Dixson, A F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^c Department of Wildlife Conservation and Science ^*  (Australia)

^d ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body weight; Female attractiveness; Sexual selection; Waist hip ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951908998     PISSN: 10905138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bjorkelund C., Lissner L., Andersson S., Lapidus L., Bengtsson C. Reproductive history in relation to relative weight and fat distribution. International Journal of Obesity 1996, 20:213-219.
2. Buss D. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating 1994, Basic Books, New York.
3. Cornelissen P.L., Tovée M.J., Bateson M. Patterns of subcutaneous fat deposition and the relationship between body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: Implications for models of physical attractiveness. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2008, 256:343-350.
4. Dixson B., Dixson A., Li B., Anderson M. Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology 2007, 19:88-95.
5. Dixson B., Dixson A., Morgan B., Anderson M. Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2007, 36:369-375.
6. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P., & Parish, A. (In press) Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand-U.S.A. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior.
7. Furnham A., Moutafi J., Baguma B. A cross-cultural study on the role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio on female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 32:729-745.
8. Furnham A., Tan T., McManus C. Wait-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences 1997, 22:539-549.
9. Grammer K., Fink B., Møller A., Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Review 2003, 78:385-407.
10. Henss R. Waist-to-hip and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological consideration. Personality and Individual Differences 2000, 28:501-513.
11. Hodge A.M., Dowse G.K., Toelupe O., Collins V.R., Imo T., Zimmet P.Z. Dramatic increase in the prevalence of obesity in Western Samoa over the 13 year period 1978-1991. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1994, 18:419-428.
12. Hudson M., Aoyama M. Waist-to-hip rations of Jomon figurines. Antiquity 2007, 81:961-971.
13. Jasieńska G., Ziomkiewicz A., Ellison P., Lipson S., Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 281:1213-1217.
14. Jenkins J., Brooks P., Sargeant S., Cooke I. Endocervical mucus pH is inversely related to serum androgen levels and waist-to-hip ratio. Fertility/Sterility 1995, 63:1005-1008.
15. Kirschner M.A., Samojilik E. Sex hormone metabolism in upper and lower body density. International Journal of Obesity 1991, 15:101-108.
16. Kosková I., Petrásek R., Vondra K., Bláha P., Skibová J., Glagolicová A., et al. Weight, body composition and fat distribution of Czech women in relation with reproductive phase: a cross-sectional study. Prague Medical Report 2007, 108:13-26.
17. Lanska D.J., Lanska M.J., Hartz A.J., Rimm A.A. Factors influencing anatomical location of fat tissue in 52,953 women. International Journal of Obesity 1985, 9:29-38.
18. Lassek W.D., Gaulin S.J.C. Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2007, 133:1147-1151.
19. Lassek W., Gaulin S. Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged source of neurodevelopmental resources?. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:26-34.
20. Marlowe F., Apicella C., Reed D. Men's preferences for profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005, 25:371-378.
21. Marti B., Tuomilehto J., Soloman V., Kartovaara L., Korhonen H.J., Pietinen Body fat distribution in the Finnish population: Environmental determinants and predictive power for cardiovascular risk factor levels. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1991, 45:131-137.
22. Pontius A. Obesity types in Stone Age art: A study in iconodiagnosis. Human Obesity 1987, 331-334. New York Academy of Sciences, New York. R.J. Wurtman, J.J. Wurtman (Eds.).
23. Roberts R., Weinfeld A., Nguyen K. "Universal" and ethnic ideals of beautiful buttocks and how to create them surgically 2005.
24. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:293-307.
25. Singh D. Female mate value at a glance: Relationships of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters 2002, 23(Suppl 4):81-91.
26. Singh D. Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness. The Journal of Sex Research 2004, 41:43-54.
27. Singh D. Universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clinical Plastic Surgery 2006, 33:359-370.
28. Singh D., Luis S. Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio in judgments of women's attractiveness. Human Nature 1995, 6:51-65.
29. Singh D., Randall P. Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and women's attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 2007, 43:329-340.
30. Swami V., Antonakopoulos N., Tovée M., Furnham A. A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female sexual attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles 2006, 54:201-211.
31. Sugiyama L. Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:51-62.
32. Symons D. The Evolution of Human Sexuality 1979, Oxford, New York.
33. Symons D. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of female sexual attractiveness. Sexual nature/sexual culture 1995, 80-118. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL. P.R. Abramson, S.D. Pinkerton (Eds.).
34. Tchernof A., Poehlman E.T. Effects of the menopause transition on body fatness and body fat distribution. Obesity Research 1998, 6:246-254.
35. Toth M.J., Tchernof A., Sites C.K., Poeehlman E.T. Effect of menopausal status on body composition and abdominal fat distribution. International Journal of Obesity 2000, 24:226-231.
36. Tovée M.J., Maisey D.S., Emery J.L., Cornellisen P.L. Visual cues to female sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B 1999, 266:211-218.
37. Tovée M.J., Cornelissen P.L. The mystery of female beauty. Nature 1999, 399:215-216.
38. Wass P., Waldenstrom U., Rossner S., Hellberg D. An android body fat distribution in females impairs pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Human Reproduction 1997, 20:219-228.
39. Wetsman A., Marlowe F. How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza in Tanzania. Human Evolution and Behavior 1999, 20:219-228.
40. Yu D.W., Shepard G.H. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?. Nature 1998, 396:321-322.
41. Zaadstra B., Seidell J., Van Noord P., Te Velde E., Habbema J., Wrieswijk B. Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of body fat distribution in conception rates. British Medical Journal 1993, 306:484-487.