Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 369-375

  Dixson, Barnaby J ^a   Dixson, Alan F ^b   Morgan, Bethan ^a   Anderson, Matthew J ^a  

^a ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cameroon; Evolution; Feminine waist to hip ratio; Masculine somatotype; Secondary sexual traits; Sexual attractiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY BUILD; CENTRAL AFRICA; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PENIS; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; RURAL POPULATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SKIN COLOR; SOMATOTYPE; WAIST HIP RATIO;

ADULT; BEAUTY; CAMEROON; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOMATOTYPES; WAIST-HIP RATIO;

EID: 34249868732     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ecology and Sociobiology, 16, 395-424.
3. Bolonchuk, W. W., Siders, W. A., Lykken, G. I., & Lukaski, H. C. (2000). Association of dominant somatotype of men with body structure, function during exercise, and nutritional assessment. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 167-180.
4. Bramble, D. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432, 345-352.
5. Buss, D. M., & Schmidt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
6. Cheek, M., Pollard, B. J., Darbyshire, I., Onana, J. M., & Wild, C. (Eds.) (2004). The plants of Kupe, Mwanenguba and the Bakossi Mountains, Cameroon: A conservation checklist. Richmond, Surrey, England: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
7. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
8. Diamond, J. (1997). Why is sex fun: The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
9. Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29-39.
11. Ejepedang-Koge S. N. (1986). Tradition of a people-Bakossi. Yaounde, Cameroon: ARC Publications.
12. Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. H. Barlow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267-288). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Fessler, D. M. T., Nettle, D., Afshar, Y., de Andrade Pinheiro, I., Bolyanatz, A., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., et al. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation of the role of foot size in physical attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 267-276.
14. Frost, P. (1988). Human skin color: A possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 32, 38-58.
15. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233-242.
16. Katzmarzyk, P. T., Malina, R. M., Song, T. M. K., & Bouchard, C. (1998). Somatotype and indicators of metabolic fitness in youth. American Journal of Human Biology, 10, 341-350.
17. Law-Smith, M. J. L., Perret, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwall, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 273, 135-140.
18. Lynch, S. M., & Zellner, D. A. (1999). Figure preference in two generations of men: The use of figure drawings illustrating differences in muscle mass. Sex Roles, 40, 833-843.
19. Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L. E., Cornellisenm, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet, 353, 1500.
20. Marlowe, F. W., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371-378.
21. Mealey, L. (1997). Bulking up: The roles of sex and sexual orientation as attempts to manipulate sexual attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 223-228.
22. Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence for unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302-311.
23. Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.
24. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., & Burt, D. M. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 268, 617-623.
25. Perret, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., & Burt, D. M. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887.
26. Potts, M. & Short, R. V. (1999). Ever since Adam and Eve: The evolution of human sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Schultze, S., Knussmann, R., & Christiansen, K. (1991). Male sex role identification and body build. Homo, 42, 203-215.
28. Sheldon, W. H., Dupertuis, C. W., & McDermott, E. (1954). Atlas of men. New York: Harpers.
29. Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals & human sexuality (pp. 1-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Singh, D. (1993). Body shape and women's attractiveness. Human Nature, 4, 297-321.
31. Singh, D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 81-91.
32. Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483-507.
33. Sodhi, V. K., & Sausker, W. F. (1988). Dermatoses of pregnancy. American Family Physician, 37, 131-138.
34. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptions of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual conflict (pp. 80-118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornellisen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 266, 211-218.
36. Van Der Berghe, P. L., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 87-113.
37. Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1998). How universal are preferences for female waist to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza from Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 228-229.
38. Wong, R., & Ellis, C. N. (1984). Physiologic skin changes in pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 10, 929-943.
39. Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321-322.