Understanding innovation in practice: A discussion of the production and re-production of nordic walking

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 447-461

  Pantza, Mika ^a   Shove, Elizabeth ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Innovation; Integration; Practice; Reproduction; Walking

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; INNOVATION; MANUFACTURING; WALKING;

EID: 77951902451     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537321003714402     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brown, J., and P. Duguid. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working learning, and innovation. Organization Science 2, no. 1: 40-51.
2. Czarniawska, B., and B. Joerges. 1996. Travels of ideas. In Translating organizational change, ed. B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon, 1-17. Berlin: De Gruyter.
3. Duguid, P. 2005. ';The art of knowing': Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society 21: 109-118.
4. Edensor, T. 2000. Walking in the British countryside: Reflexivity, embodied practices and ways to escape. Body and Society 6, no. 3-4 81-106.
5. Erlingsdottir, G., and K. Lindberg. 2005. Isomorphism, isopraxism, and isonymism: Complementary or competing pro- cesses. In Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy, ed. B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon. In series Advances in Organization Studies. Stockholm: Liber & Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
6. European Commission. 1998. A pan-EU survey on consumer attitudes to physical activity, body weight and health. Directorate-General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, Directorate V/F.3. Brussels: European Commission.
7. Firat, A., and N. Dholakia. 2000. Consuming people. From political economy to theatres ofconsumption. London: Routledge.
8. Franke, N., and S. Shah. 2003. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32: 151-78.
9. Geels, F. 2005. Technological transitions and systems innovations. A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution ofsociety. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Hirschman, E., L. Scott, and W. Wells. 1998. A model of product discourse: Linking consumer practice to cultural texts. Journal of Advertising 21, no. 1: 33-50.
12. Hutchins, E. 1993. Learning to navigate. In Understanding Practice, ed. S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 35-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. ISPO. 2003. ISPO_News Review summer 03. Information for the sport community. Munchen: ISPO.
14. ISPO. 2004. ISPO winter 04 review. Information for the sport community. Munchen: ISPO.
15. Jeppesen, L., and M. Molin. 2003. Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15: 363-383.
16. Juurtola, T. 1977. Suomen Urheiluopisto (The Finnish Sports Institute). Lahti: Esan Kirjapaino.
17. Kantaneva, M., and R. Kasurinen. 1999. Sauvakavelysta sauvaliikuntaan (From stick walking to stick excercises). Lahti: Esa Print.
18. Korkman, O. 2006. Customer value formation in practice-A practice theoretical approach, Publication No. 155. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
19. Kotro, T. 2005. Hobbyist knowing in product development. Desirable objects and passion for sports in Suunto Corporation. Helsinki: Publication Series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki A 56.
20. Leadbeater, C., and P. Miller. 2004. The Pro-Am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. London: Demos.
21. Lilien, G., P. Morrison, K. Searls, M. Sonnack, and E. von Hippel. 2002. Performance assessment ofthe lead user idea generation process for new product development. MIT Sloan School of Management working paper, April.
22. Luthje, C., C. Herstatt, and E. von Hippel. 2002. The dominant role of 'local' information in user innovation: The case of mountain biking. MIT Sloan School Working Paper, July.
23. Maryanski, A., and J. Turner. 1992. The social cage. Human nature and the evolution of society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24. McCracken, G. 1986. Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research 13: 71-84.
25. Oksanen-Sarela, K., and P. Timonen. 2005. Making sense of new practice of walking. In Manufacturing leisure. Innovations in fun, ed. M. Pantzar and E. Shove. Research Report 1/2005. Helsinki: National Consumer Research Centre.
26. Orlikowski, W. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organization. Organization Science 13: 249-273.
27. Pantzar, M., and E. Shove, eds. 2005. Manufacturing leisure. Innovations in fun. Research Report 1/2005. Helsinki: National Consumer Research Centre.
28. Pantzar, M., and E. Shove. 2010. Temporal rhythms as outcomes ofsocial practices: A speculative discussion. Ethnologia Europaea. Journal of European Ethnology, forthcoming.
29. Reckwitz, A. 2002. Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5, no. 2: 243-63.
30. Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change: Resources and technology, ed. S. Rayner and E. Malone. vol. 2. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
31. Ryave, L., and J. Schenkein. 1974. Notes on the art of walking. In Ethnomethodology, ed. R. Turner, 265-75. London: Penguin Education.
32. Schatzki, T. 1996. Social practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Schatzki, T., K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny, eds. 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory, 42-55. London: Routledge.
34. Schumpeter, J. 1949. The theory of economic development an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (first published in German in 1911 as Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung).
35. Shah, S. 2005. Open beyond software. In Open Sources, ed. D. Cooper, C. DiBona and M. Stone. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media.
36. Shove, E., and M. Pantzar. 2005. Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic Walking. Journal of Consumer Culture 1: 43-64.
37. Shove, E., and M. Pantzar. 2006. Fossilization. Journal of European Ethnology 35, no. 1-2 59-63.
38. Suchman, L. 1984. Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Suchman, L., J. Blomberg, J. Orr, and R. Trigg. 1999. Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist 43, no. 3: 392-408.
40. Warde, A. 2005. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5, no. 2: 131-53.
41. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Wikstrom, S. 1996. The customer as co-producer. European Journal of Marketing 30, no. 4: 6-19.
43. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.