Evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with optimal heart rate control by systematic administration of beta-blocker drugs

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 431-439

  Martuscelli, Eugenio ^a   Romagnoli, Andrea ^a   D'Eliseo, Alessia ^a   Sperandio, Massimiliano ^a   Di Luozzo, Marco ^a   De Angelis, Barbara ^a   Romeo, Francesco ^a   Simonetti, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Coronary stent; Multislice computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ALPRAZOLAM; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; ESMOLOL; IOMEPROL; METOPROLOL; PROPRANOLOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; STANDARD; SYSTEMIC THERAPY;

ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; AGED; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77951794987     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283330fcd     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. For Europe: MRG data plus internal data. Toronto, Canada: Millennium Research Group, For USA: USMO data plus internal data. California, USA: Abbott Vascular.
2. Pache J, Dibra A, Mehilli J, Dirscinger J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Drug eluting stents compared with thin strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1262-1268.
3. Nicolau K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64 MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187:111-117.
4. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112:2318-2323.
5. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97:173-174.
6. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, Wildermuth S. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice spiral computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482-1487.
7. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolau F, Paul S, et al. Quantification of obstructive and non obstructive coronary lesions by 64 slice computed tomography. A comparative study with Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:147-154.
8. Chowdhury H, Ahsan D, Bush T, Kondo M, Poon. Follow up of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. In: Budoff M, Achenbach S, Narula J, editors. Atlas of cardiovascular computed tomography. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 85, Chapter 6.
9. Nieman K, Mollet N, Cademartiri F, De Feyter P. Patency control of coronary stents. In: Ohnesorge BM, Flohr TG, Becker CR, Knez A, Reser MF, editors. Multislice and dual-source CT in cardiac imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 239, Chapter 7.7.
10. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kaminaga S, Yamauchi T, Kuwahara S, Yokohama N, et al. Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel and vessel orientation to the z axis. Circ J 2005; 69:1124-1133.
11. Cademartiri F, Schujf JD, Pugliese F, Mollet N, Jukema W, Maffei E, et al. Usefulness of 64 slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2204-2210.
12. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, Matsubara T, Terashima M, Tsuchikane E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:951-959.
13. Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, Anders K, Pflederer T, Komatsu S, et al. Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1:177-186. (Pubitemid 351447183)
14. Ropers D. Heart rate-independent dual source computed tomography coronary angiography: growing experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008; 2:115-116.
15. Dey D, Lee CJ, Ohba M, Gutstein A, Slomka PJ, Cheng V, et al. Image quality and artifacts in coronary CT angiography with dual source CT: initial clinical experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008; 2:105-114.
16. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steignei ML, VorobiofG, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320 detector row computed tomography. Int J Card Imaging 2008; 24:535-546.
17. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns R-JM, Vas J, Pattynama PTT, Krestin GP, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multiple spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 2002; 88:470-474. (Pubitemid 35221956)
18. Lescha S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles M, Husman L, Plass A, et al. Non invasive coronary angiography by 64 section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 24:378-385.
19. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A. ECG gated reconstruction multi detector row CT coronary angiography: effects of trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 2001; 220:712-717.
20. Manghat N, Van LIngen R, Hewson P, Syed F, Kakani N, Cox I, et al. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101:1567-1573.
21. Martuscelli E, Razzini C, D'Eliseo A, Di Luozzo M, Borzi M, Romeo F. In stent restenosis and multislice computer tomography: is the method ready to start? J Cardiovasc Med 2007; 8:377-380.
22. Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, Borghans A, Dennen K, Hoffmann R, Hanrath P. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003; 89:167-172.
23. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, Razzini C, Tomassini M, Sperandio M, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004; 25:1043-1048.
24. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, Le Gal G, Nonent M, Mansourati J, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2006; 92:58-61.
25. Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Finn A, Golg HK, et al. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multidetector computed tomography. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69:933-938.
26. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, McCollough C, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009; 301:500-507.
27. Earls J, Urban B, Berman E, Curry C, Lane J, Jennings R. Prospective gated coronary CT angiography: an evaluation of effective dose and reliability in a large patient group. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007; 1:S6.
28. Sablayrolles JL, Treutenaere JM, Feignoux J, Jardin C. Latest clinical breakthrough in cardiac CT: drastic dose reduction with SnapShot pulse mode on light speed VCT XT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007; 1:S7.
29. Abbara S, Zadeh A, Callister T, Desai M, Weigold G. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3:190-204.