Computerised routinely collected primary care data: Essential for patient access to records, quality improvement and research

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-7

  De Lusignan, Simon ^a,b  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Informatics in Primary Care   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE; STATISTICS;

CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE;

EID: 77951777359     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v18i1.748     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. de Lusignan S and van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006; 23(2):253-263
2. Gibson-White A and Majeed A. The Wellcome Trust Report: moving forward the use of general practice electronic patient records for research. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):141-142
3. de Lusignan S. Using routinely collected patient data with and without consent: trust and professionalism. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):251-254
4. Navarro R. People and technology must work together to solve the sharing problem. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):139.
5. Mathers N, Perrin N and Watt G. Using patient records from general practice for research. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):137-138
6. Hinds A. Data confidentiality and data handling in research: a workshop report. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):271-275
7. Neame R. Privacy and health information: health cards offer a workable solution. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):263-270
8. Navarro R. An ethical framework for sharing patient data without consent. Informatics in Primary Care 2008; 16(4):257-262
9. de Lusignan S, Sullivan F and Krause P. Vault, cloud and agent: choosing strategies for quality improvement and research based on routinely collected health data. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(1):1-4.
10. Treweek S, Pearson E, Smith N et al. Desktop software to identify patients eligible for recruitment into a clinical trial: using SARMA to recruit to the ROAD feasibility trial. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(1):51-58
11. Nagykaldi Z, Calmbach W, DeAlleaume L et al. Facilitating patient self-management through telephony and web technologies in seasonal influenza. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(1):9-16.
12. Hannan A. Providing patients online access to their primary care computerised medical records: a case study of sharing and caring. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(1):41-49
13. Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Wald JS et al. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an electronic health record designed to improve medication safety: the Patient Gateway medications module. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(2):147-155
14. Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971;1(7696):405-412
15. McInnes DK, Gifford AL, Kazis LE and Wagner TH. Disparities in health-related internet use by US veterans: results from a national survey. Informatics in Primary Care 2010;18(1):59-68.
16. Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M et al. Implementation of an electronic medical record in family practice: a case study. Informatics in Primary Care 2010; 18(1):31-40.
17. Carr-Bains S and de Lusignan S. Moving to paperlessness: a case study from a large general practice. Informatics in Primary Care 2003;11(3):157-163
18. Stream GR. Trends in adoption of electronic health records by family physicians in Washington State. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17(3):145-152
19. Yoon-Flannery K, Zandieh SO, Kuperman GJ et al .A qualitative analysis of an electronic health record (EHR) implementation in an academic ambulatory setting. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):277-284
20. de Lusignan S. Relearning the lessons about the implementation of information systems in primary care: a report from the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Special Topic Conference 2007 in Croatia. Informatics in Primary Care 2007;15(3):167-168
21. Samoutis G, Soteriades ES, Kounalakis DK et al. Implementation ofan electronic medical record system in previously computer-naive primary care centres: a pilot study from Cyprus. Informatics in Primary Care 2007; 15(4):207-216
22. Vikstrom A, Nyström M, Åhlfeldt H, Strender L-E and Nilsson GH. Views of diagnosis distribution in primary care in 2.5 million encounters in Stockholm: a comparison between ICD-10 and SNOMED CT. Informatics in Primary Care 2010; 18(1):17-29.