Using routinely collected patient data with and without consent: Trust and professionalism

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 251-254

  de Lusignan, Simon ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60649106989     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v16i4.700     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. de Lusignan S and van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: Opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006; 23(2):253-63.
2. de Lusignan S. What is primary care informatics? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003; 10(4):304-9.
3. The Big Opt Out. www.thebigoptout.com/
4. Ipsos MORI. The Use of Personal Health Data in Medical Research - General Public Consultation - Final Report. London: Medical Research Council (MRC), 2007. www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/ index.htm?d=MRC003810
5. NHS Connecting for Health. Consultation on Public, Patients, and Other Interested Parties Views on Additional Uses of Patient Data. Report to be published at www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/ susconsultation/
6. Wellcome Trust. Towards Consensus for Best Practice: The use of patient records for research in general practice. www.wellcome.ac.uk/GPrecords
7. Mathers N, Perrin N and Watt G. Towards consensus for best practice: The use of patient records for research in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2008: 58(556);814-15.
8. Navarro R. Ethical framework for sharing data without consent. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):257-62.
9. Malin BA. An evaluation of the current state of genomic data privacy protection technology and a roadmap for the future. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005;12(1):28-34.
10. De Moor GJ, Claerhout B and De Meyer F. Privacy enhancing techniques - the key to secure communication and management of clinical and genomic data. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003;42(2):148-53.
11. Fugelli P. James Mackenzie Lecture. Trust in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2001; 51(468):575-9.
12. de Lusignan S, Chan T, Theadom A and Dhoul N. The roles of policy and professionalism in the protection of processed clinical data: A literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76(4):261-8.
13. Roberts J and Hayes G. Health informatics needs regulation and registration to add value recognition. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2004;109:90-4.
14. Department of Health. Health Informatics Review Report. www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_086073
15. Neame R. Privacy and health information: Health cards offer a workable solution. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):263-70.
16. Hinds A. Data confidentiality and data handling in research: A workshop report. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16(4):271-5.
17. de Lusignan S, Metsemakers JF, Houwink P, Gunnarsdottir V and van der Lei J. Routinely collected general practice data: Goldmines for research? A report of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Primary Care Informatics Working Group (EFMI PCIWG) from MIE2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14(3):203-9.